Alternate Energy: Power Stock or Toxic Waste?

by Melissa Davis - 10/4/2010 8:01:19 AM

Four years ago, Alternate Energy (OTC: AEHI.PKCEO Donald Gillispie arrived in one of the poorest counties in Idaho and began selling company stock to local investors impressed by his grand plans.

Although AEHI had spent just $1,000 on research and development during the previous two years, regulatory filings show, the company boasted all sorts of remarkable inventions. AEHI claimed that it had developed a breakthrough fuel additive that could slash the costs of natural gas-powered electricity, for example, and that it was also creating mini reactors that would “revolutionize nuclear power in an urban setting.” Even better, the company said that it was poised to become “the first company to harness the natural energy delivered in a bolt of lightning” – a goal later portrayed as “hopeless” by a national lightning expert interviewed by The New York Times.

While ambitious, however, those projects ranked as mere side shows for the young public company. If possible, AEHI had even bigger plans. Despite its minimal resources, skeptics say, AEHI promised to build a multibillion-dollar nuclear power plant – the first project of its kind for decades -- in a rural Idaho desert that lacked the vast water supply and available transmission lines normally required to make such projects work.

“They have no money; they have no plans,” a county commissioner told the local Owyhee Avalanche newspaper at the time. “Most (locals) think that it’s … a daydream or a fairy tale.” 

Since then, records show, AEHI has announced funding deals with at least three obscure financial firms – including one whose leader would later be charged with alleged securities fraud – but still lacks the money required for even the equivalent of a down payment on a nuclear power plant. AEHI also keeps changing the planned location for its proposed plant, local news coverage reveals, currently settling on an Idaho county already ruled out by Warren Buffett’s MidAmerican Nuclear Energy because it made no economic sense.

Nevertheless, AEHI has still managed to sell its own investors on the massive project. The company’s volatile stock, which once fetched mere penniescurrently trades for 87 cents a share. With a share count of 320 million, up from about 40 million a few years ago, AEHI now boasts a market value of $280 million.

“I’ve thought about this a lot,” says Joe Weatherby, a former planning and zoning commissioner in the first Idaho county that AEHI targeted for its plant. “If I were going to design the perfect scam, what elements I would include?

“Gillispie has preyed on ignorance and greed. He has preyed on every little thing that might make people tick.”

Pitching Stock

Weatherby was busy preparing a long-term energy plan for Owyhee County, a region where 17.5% of the population lives below the poverty rate, when Gillispie suddenly burst onto the scene. The plan, which originally excluded high-priced nuclear power (favoring the county’s abundant wind resources instead), began attracting some unexpected resistance from locals at that point. 

“I found out that Gillispie had hired a hay broker who traveled all over the county and knew all of the farmers around here,” Weatherby states. “This hay broker would offer contracts to farmers and ranchers promising them power at 1.5 cents to 1.7 cents a kilowatt hour (10 times cheaper than most nuclear power) if they bought the company’s stock.

“He actually solicited his drivers to help him sell the stock,” Weatherby continues. “So a lot of locals already owned the stock by the time we started our hearings on the energy plan.”

Weatherby identified the hay broker as Jason Sells, who shows up in AEHI filings as a major stockholder himself. In anInternet bio, Sells portrays himself as a successful entrepreneur who “was a licensed commodity broker in the state of Idaho.” Even if he remains licensed to sell commodities in his home state, however, he would still need a separate “Series 7” license in order to legally sell stock.

In a recent telephone interview, Gillispie described Sells as an AEHI fan who bought the company’s stock and voluntarily promoted it to others in the local community. However, Gillispie said, the company – rather than Sells – actually sold that stock. Moreover, he added, the company took steps to make sure that it sold no stock to those who lacked the means (either $1 million in assets, excluding primary residence, or $250,000 in annual income) that would qualify them as suitable investors.

“We’re not supposed to,” Gillispie explained. “But we really can’t know … They put down what they’re worth, (and) we have to trust them.”

Despite those restrictions, AEHI found plenty of investors in one of the poorest states in the nation. All told, Gillispie estimates, almost half of AEHI’s stockholders reside in Idaho.

Bruce Day, a former securities commissioner for the state of Oklahoma who previously worked for the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as well, sensed possible reason for alarm.

“I would absolutely look into this,” says Day, who now serves as a partner for a major securities law firm based in Oklahoma City. “I would be shocked if Idaho regulators haven’t done that already.”

Marilyn Chastain, chief of the securities bureau for the Idaho Department of Finance, confirmed that her agency has fielded complaints about AEHI. She could not comment on the nature of those complaints, however, or discuss what actions – if any – her agency has taken in response.

Meanwhile, AEHI has long since abandoned its plans to build a nuclear power plant in Owyhee County. About two years ago, the local Mountain Home News reported, AEHI suddenly discovered fault lines – present for an estimated 500,000 years – on its proposed site and shifted its plans to nearby Elmore County instead.

Potential Conflicts

There, AEHI would face an even bigger showdown.

This time, records show, AEHI tapped Jim Tibbs – a retired Boise police officer and current member of the Boise City Council – to moderate the company’s public hearings. His appointment caught the attention of John Weber, a board member for a local environmental group known as the Snake River Alliance, who worried about possible conflicts and wanted to make sure that Tibbs could be trusted to be fair.

“All I do is run the meeting,” Tibbs assured Weber in an email ahead of the first hearing. “I don’t take sides.”

Even with Tibbs in charge, the Mountain Home News noted, that meeting proved to be explosive. Police officers arrested a prominent nuclear activist and led him away in handcuffs, the newspaper reported, triggering outrage from other environmentalists in the crowd. Skeptics also raised questions about Gillispie’s credentials, which turned out to be less impressive than they first seemed.

In its original regulatory filings, AEHI claimed that Gillispie held an MBA from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. After Weatherby secured a fax from MIT stating that Gillispie had never earned an actual degree from the school, however, AEHI revised his bio to state that he simply “completed the senior executive program” – a short, non-degree offering – at MIT instead.

(On another note, filings show, Gillispie also claimed that he operated a firm called Grace Glens Consulting – which provided advisory services to senior nuclear executives – beginning in 2002. According to Internet records, however, Gillispie never even incorporated that firm until 2005.)

Meanwhile, Weatherby came under attack following that contentious hearing. In a letter to the editor of the Mountain Home News, James E. Cooper -- identified by Weatherby as an area stockbroker and the son of a major AEHI shareholder -- portrayed Weatherby as a conflicted activist involved in “a very large wind farm business venture (with) over 5,000 windmills.” At the same time, Cooper reported no connection to the company. 

For his part, Weatherby has dismissed Cooper’s claims as ludicrous. He denies any financial conflicts, while pointing out that a 5,000-turbine wind farm would eclipse the record-breaking 2,000-turbine project once planned by legendary oilman T. Boone Pickens and therefore rank as the largest wind farm in the entire world.

To critics, AEHI supporters look like the conflicted ones instead. For example, they note, Tibbs -- the so-called “independent” moderator – wound up owning stock in the controversial company after all.

According to a company filing, Tibbs received 15,000 shares of AEHI stock a month after that heated mid-2008 meeting. That filing, which surfaced about three months after the hearing, indicates that Tibbs paid 10 cents a share – or about one-third of the market price at the time – for that stock. However, his comments suggest that he may have never paid for the stock at all.

“I was compensated by AEHI for being the moderator,” Tibbs explained in a November 2008 email to Weber. “I did not go out and purchase the stock on my own.” 

Printing Press

Tibbs shows up (along with other locals) on a long list of investors who received unregistered AEHI stock – often deeply discounted and sometimes totally free – during the company’s first few years of operation.

By September of 2008, regulatory filings show, AEHI had issued almost 75 million shares of unregistered stock – or half of its authorized shares – through such transactions. Gillispie and his family received more than one-third of those shares. AEHI Vice President/Secretary Jennifer Ransom, a former insurance agent described by locals as Gillispie’s girlfriend (30 years his junior), picked up millions of shares as well.

Since then, AEHI has issued even more company stock – much of it to insiders -- and dramatically increased both its authorized and outstanding shares. In January of this year, for example, AEHI awarded Gillispie and Ransom a combined 11 million shares of stock even as the company approached its new 250-million share limit. AEHI then doubled its authorized share count to 500 million the following month, filings show, and awarded Gillispie and Ransomanother 12 million shares a couple of days later.

According to regulatory filings, AEHI covers "living expenses" for Gillispie as well.

“Last summer, Gillispie started driving around in a Porsche 911 twin turbo that costs around $150,000,” Weber says. “And he still has his Maserati parked out in front of the company’s office.”

At first, regulatory filings show, AEHI operated out of Gillispie’s home in Virginia before leasing a small office in Idaho. Back then, AEHI employed Gillispie’s young daughter – whose thin work experience included a stint as an undergraduate college tutor and a job as a pharmacy technician – to serve as secretary of the nuclear power company. Ransom officially assumed that post in May of 2008, company records show, quickly scoring 3.5 million AEHI shares for the favor.

At that point, AEHI had already inked at least two financing deals for its ambitious project. In mid-2007, AEHIsuddenly announced that an outfit known as Cobblestone Financial Group had agreed to secure a handsome $3.5 billion for the company’s nuclear power plant. Within weeks of that news, however, the Associated Press had raised questionsabout Cobblestone – which normally caters to small operations like bars and gas stations – and its ability to fund such a deal.

Later that year, AEHI announced a more modest $150 million funding deal with a firm called SilverLeaf Capital Partners. This spring, records show, SilverLeaf Capital President Shane Baldwin wound up charged with securities fraud for alleged misconduct related to a separate investment deal. (Baldwin managed to escape jail time, The Salt Lake Tribune reported, by repaying his alleged victims in full.)

Meanwhile, local news coverage reveals, AEHI went on to ink yet another financing deal. In mid-2008, the Idaho Business Review reported, AEHI tapped a mysterious firm known only as “Powered Corporation” as its new financing partner. Powered had completed no other projects at that point, the newspaper noted, and had seen its previous multibillion-dollar deal – calling for five nuclear power plants in Yemen – killed by allegations of corruption.

The Snake River Alliance predicted, quite correctly, that the new deal would end in failure as well.

“AEHI’s latest pronouncement of financial support for this power project should be treated with the credibility it deserves – none,” the group stated in the article. “Powered Corporation’s financial health seems to be on par with AEHI’s … The fact is there’s still no money in this project, and for good reason.”

Less than a year later, The Oregonian reported, Powered quietly disclosed that it was “winding up” its business and disappeared from the scene.

Act Three

By then, the local Times-News reported, Elmore County zoning officials had already rejected AEHI’s plans for its nuclear power plant. If the Elmore County commissioners followed suit, AEHI warned in the article, the company would abandon Idaho and take its project to another state.

As it turns out, however, AEHI simply shifted its project to yet another Idaho county instead. (While most states employ a strict review process, experts say, Idaho can approve a proposed nuclear power plant with favorable votes from just two county commissioners.) This time, AEHI chose tiny Payette County – the same county Warren Buffett’s company had ruled out for economic reasons, the Snake River Alliance noted, after spending millions on a detailed study the previous year.

“He just did the math on it, and he couldn’t make it work,” Weber says. “And the economics have gotten even worse since that time.”

Specifically, Weber says, nuclear projects need help from three absent forces – carbon taxes, high natural gas prices and a booming economy – in order to succeed. AEHI’s own project in Payette County faces even more formidable challenges, he says, due to limited water supplies, constrained transmission lines and an obvious lack of financing. (Arjun Makhijani, president of the Institute for Energy and Environmental Research, has issued a detailed report challenging the economic viability of AEHI’s proposed nuclear plant as well.)

For his part, Gillispie strongly disputes such arguments. He says that AEHI will have access to a nearby river with a “gazillion” gallons of water and will simply connect its power plant to a new transmission line that’s currently being built. He also claims that “mistakes” – rather than economics – drove Buffett’s firm away. As evidence, he points out that Buffett is now investigating the possibility of building a nuclear power plant in Iowa. (While true, an industry report reveals, Buffett’s firm actually owns a utility in Iowa, and that state – unlike Idaho – uses nuclear-generated power already.)

“Economics was just a smokescreen for the media,” Gillispie insists. “He’s an ‘economic guy.’ What else is he going to say?”

Regardless, AEHI critics continue to cast doubt on the company’s grand plans. If anything, they state, AEHI’s planned project looks less attractive now than it did when the company first arrived in Idaho several years ago. 

From the start, they note, AEHI has touted generous federal loan guarantees promised for the first nuclear power plants built under a new government program. But AEHI has failed to clear any major hurdles since that time, they say, so the company has yet to even secure a place – behind much larger players – in that growing line. Moreover, they add, the company still faces a national application process that literally takes years to complete.

“The actual likelihood of that reactor being built is incredibly low,” says Liz Woodruff, an energy policy analyst for the Snake River Alliance. “AEHI has been successful in polishing the edges to make itself look more appealing to investors. But the company remains financially in trouble, with a project that’s unviable, so people should steer clear.”

Exit Strategy

By issuing 132.9 million shares of discounted stock (and essentially selling one-third of the company -- now valued at $280 million -- for less than $10 million), filings show, AEHI has at least managed to put a decent chunk of change in the bank this year. For example, records show, AEHI sold 50 million shares of 10-cent stock in April and May alone. While that deal cushioned AEHI’s bank account, however, it could also hurt investors who’ve been paying market rates for the company’s stock.

Based on current prices, investors who bought that cheap stock in early April (and have now held it for the mandatory six months) could start selling their stake – for a hefty 770% gain -- and put serious pressure on the shares. 

For his part, Gillispie says that he has no plans to sell any AEHI stock himself. Although he filed paperwork in Augustsignaling the possible sale of 3 million shares, he says he never actually sold the stock but simply lifted the restrictions on it so he could use it as collateral for a home loan instead.

That stock looked a lot less valuable, with the shares stuck around 20 cents apiece, until a powerful promotion this May. After talking with an AEHI shareholder in a bar, Gillispie says, a newsletter writer “got excited” and penned a report that portrayed the company as “the greatest thing since sliced bread.” Fueled by that promotion, AEHI’s stock soaredfrom 21 cents to $1.45 a share in a single day. While AEHI failed to hold onto most of those gains, dropping back to 60 cents by the close, the stock has remained well above its pre-promotion price since that time.

Alternative Energy Speculator, which issued that tout, followed up with another ringing endorsement – forecasting 18,375% gains – a few weeks before Gillispie lifted the restriction on his shares. Two other outfits, the KonLin Investment Letter and, chimed in with bullish AEHI calls shortly afterwards.

While some investors have taken big profits at this point, however, Gillispie says that he sees no reason to do the same.

“I would be foolish to sell it at 80 cents,” Gillispie told TheStreetSweeper last week. “This stock is going to be worth a lot of money. It will probably be $2 by the first quarter – and $4 or $5 by the end of next year.”

For AEHI, Gillispie predicts, the third time will prove to be a charm. He expresses total confidence that Payette County will approve the company’s nuclear power plant by December and, once that happens, financing for the multibillion-dollar project will finally arrive.

AEHI continues to issue a steady stream of press releases, touting its nuclear power plant and other business ventures (which now include water purifiers for Pakistani flood victims), in the meantime. But at some point, critics say, the company will need to deliver some actual results in order to support its lofty market value.

“Gillispie keeps writing press releases every couple of days, trying to pump up the stock,” Weber says. “But you can’t keep a company alive with just press releases.

“Eventually,” he declares, “you have to do something.”

* Note: No member of TheStreetSweeper’s staff or advisory board has ever taken a financial position in AEHI or received any compensation from others who have positions in the stock. As editor of the site, Melissa Davis will never take a position in any of the stocks that she covers. To contact Ms. Davis, the author of this story, please send an email to

Anavex Life Sciences: Biotech Pump Goes On And On And ...

If we didn’t know better, we’d think Anavex Life Sciences Corp. (OTC: AVXL) enthusiasts had ripped off a “Saturday Night Live” sketch featuring pump-you-up guys Hans and Franz.

Picking up three patents and one patent application, Anavex conducted a reverse merger in 2007 and switched from a digital-to-photo-print business targeting corner stores into a biotech company targeting Alzheimer’s.

Today, the company has no commercial product, hasn’t earned a penny since inception and does “not anticipate earning any revenues” until it can convince some other company to come aboard.

The company has lost $61.8 million  over about 12 years of operations and is living on the ragged edge of survival.

And don’t let the stock price fool you. Though it sports an astonishing $230 million-plus market valuation, this stock is worth a fraction of today’s price.

The company has not responded to TheStreetSweeper’s request for comment but investors may find other viewpoints here.  We’re just scratching the surface with this first look at a batch of highly promotional biotech stocks poised to dive.

*”We’re Here to Pump (clap) You Up!”

The 25 top biotech giants such as Johnson & Johnson and Novartis and Eli Lilly do not rely on hype to push their stock.

But Anavex has everyone from the CEO to pump sites to message board fans clapping their hands and cheering on Anavex with, “We’re here to pump you up!”

The chief executive officer, Christopher Missling, had this to say in a recent interview:

“Anavex has now a team of big pharma and biotech experts, doubled the number of Scientific Advisors which is mostly Medical Doctors, raised a company's record amount of $10M in one funding transaction, advanced after that quickly into Phase 2a, licensed additional promising compounds into the company. Anavex is significantly more advanced than in 2007.”

Yet Anavex filings say it operates with just “four (4) full-time employees, and we retain several independent contractors on an as-needed basis.” (Don’t miss the section below titled “Executive Compensation” to put employee compensation into perspective.)

Other concerning promotional efforts include:

The CEO sounds highly promotional - talking about reversing the disease and stopping the disease today (despite having its experimental drug just barely in the human testing stage involving dose toleration of just 32 subjects) - in this one video of four Anavex videos on Wide World of Stocks. WWOS is a site Timothy Sykes connected with Viral Genetics and one that also discloses that its employees sometimes receive investments in companies it features.This series just begged for a dose of the brash objectivity of SNL character Roseanne Roseannadanna.

B. Additional promotion on Stock News Now, here, a rather well-known microchip promotional site.


Torchlight Energy Resources: Six Reasons This Former Pole-Dancing Company Is Running Out Of Energy

Hang onto your G-string. Torchlight Energy Resources (NasdaqCM: TRCH) – formerly a pole dancing studio – appears positioned to shimmy down to reality.

The oil and gas company danced onto the public stage as Pole Perfect Studios (OTC Bulletin Board: PPFT), a business built around “a fireman’s pole often found in gentleman’s clubs” ala the one-time fitness fad reminiscent of strip clubs. Pole’s founders invested less than a penny per share to start the biz and raised a few thousand dollars in 2008 by selling shares for 7 cents apiece.

But Pole teetered. So in 2010, the pole dancing company pulled off its fake eyelashes, changed its name and ticker symbol, and emerged as an oil and gas company.

Now operating out of a small office leased from a Plano, Texas travel agency (shown here), Torchlight today claims five projects in Texas, Oklahoma and Kansas. Much like its predecessor, Torchlight exists as an un-productive, money-chewing entity that hands investors a minus 360 percent return on equity.

In fact, financial despair has forced Torchlight to offer an extremely liberal interpretation of its oil reserves in an apparent attempt to attract investors.

Torchlight was unavailable for comment by deadline, but investors may find other viewpoints here. Meanwhile, here are the top six reasons TheStreetSweeper would never own this stock.

1.*Outlandish Oil Reserve Estimates

Torchlight’s estimates of the value of its oil reserves – oil still in the ground – are completely out of touch with reality.

Why? The company bases estimates on $91.48 oil prices! That’s right.


Clearsign Combustion: Ready To Implode On Losses, Hype, Looming Dilution and More

Clearsign Combustion (CLIR) shares have virtually exploded but research suggests the company itself may be on the brink of implosion.

TheStreetSweeper offers this quick hit report highlighting the top risks poised to burn up the stock value.

The Seattle, Washington-based company is working on technology to improve emission performance and efficiency of combustion systems. The technologies are called Duplex and Electrodynamic Combustion Control or ECC.

But Clearsign has forgotten investment guru Warren Buffett’s advice: “Rule Number 1: Never lose money. Rule Number 2: Never forget Rule Number 1.” The company consistently loses money, offers zero-revenue, no significant sales since inception in 2008, no analyst interest, little real institutional interest, an uncertain future and depends on penny stock promotions to keep the stock fired up. A stock offering may be needed before long just to fuel company operations.

While other viewpoints are available here, we present details of the chief investment risks:

*Looming Dilution - Clearsign will likely conduct another stock offering within six to 12 months.

The company has always depended on stock offerings to stay in business. The finance-reviving stock offerings are shown in filings, here, and include:

  1. April and May 2012 – Initial public offering of 3.45 million shares at $4 per share. Cash to Clearsign: $11.6 million.
  2. March 2014 – Direct offering of 812,500 shares at $8 per share. Cash to Clearsign: $5.8 million.
  3. February 2015 – Public offering of 3 million shares at $5.85 per share. Cash to Clearsign: $16.3 million.

The chart, below, graphically shows how dilutive stock offerings keep Clearsign on its feet. The share count continues to rise while the cash burns.


Fenix Parts: This Automobile Parts Seller Could Be Headed To The Junkyard

Fenix Parts (Nasdaq: FENX) resembles the Johnny Cash hit describing the Cadillac put together "One Piece at a Time," from parts he and an auto-worker buddy gradually steal from the assembly line and eventually cobble into a "Psycho-Billy" heap.

It took the determined workers about 24 years to create a weird Caddy at a cost estimated to exceed the price of a showroom model. But Fenix took only four months to roll-up a dozen companies into a money-losing jalopy arguably worth a fraction of its ~$190-million market valuation.

Westchester, Illinois-based Fenix operates like a legal chop shop. The company buys broken-down heaps from automobile auctions, pulls them apart and then sells the parts and scrap metal. It operates more like a junkyard at several locations, where the company buys junkers from individuals. Customers range from body shops and car repair shops to "shade tree mechanics" and hobbyists.

Fenix has not responded to our request for comment, but investors may read various viewpoints here. Meanwhile, TheStreetSweeper presents the executive summary highlighting Fenix investment risks:

1. Losing Money - Fenix is running in the red. It's almost out of cash.

2. Risky Rollup - The company IPO'd four months ago as a rollup and has already acquired a dozen companies. These rapid acquisitions result in distracted management and accelerated costs associated with buying, integrating and running very different businesses.

3. Directors Flee; Management Overwhelmed - The chief executive apparently lacks experience in the auto parts business and has installed equally inexperienced former co-workers as directors. Those two directors recently departed under rather odd circumstances.

4. Messy Financials - Fenix is also challenged by messy financials, apparent inability to file financial reports on time and a Nasdaq deficiency notice. All may well suppress or kill investor interest in the stock.

5. Dilution Looming - Fenix will likely soon sell stock - ultimately diluting current shareholders' stock. In fact, the Securities and Exchange Commission has already approved the paperwork to sell more stock at any time.

6. Pending Insider Selling - Insiders will be able to sell currently locked up stock beginning Nov. 10.

*Risky Rollup - Running In The Red; Running Out Of Cash

A risky rollup, Fenix acquired its first 11 corporate entities for ~$93 million cash plus about 3 million shares of stock just days after the company's initial public offering in May 2015. The CEO had prepared for that moment with a series of private stock offerings that cost insiders 10 cents apiece for some stock and $10,000 to $13,000 apiece for other stock, which ultimately underwent a 2,000-for-1 stock split.

Fenix had to lower its hoped-for $10 offer price to $8 per share and increase the share count to 12 million shares. Fenix was forced to borrow millions to pay the full $93 million acquisition expense plus a little left over for operating costs.

Fenix soon rapped its own fingers with a rusty wrench once again. It seems the acquired companies began reporting unexpectedly lower revenues - dinged and dented by lower scrap prices.

Fenix Parts most recently submitted, first quarter, financials are shown below:


Flotek Industries: An Oil Patch And Cosmetic Counter Mess Poised To Drop

Flotek Industries (FTK) strives to make money in oddly different areas – the oil field and the cosmetics counter. And it is failing miserably.

The company just reported an astounding $12.5 million quarterly loss or negative 23 cents per share.

This odd business got an even odder reaction to its earnings report. The stock price rocketed!

That’s right. But we’ve drilled into Flotek filings and other publicly available information only to find a dry hole… and a broken perfume bottle.

TheStreetSweeper presents a quick hit zeroing in on the top reasons we think FTK stock should plummet. However, investors may read bullish viewpoints here and financial details on pages 3-7 here.

*What Is Flotek?

First, Houston-based Flotek sells products primarily to oil and gas companies. The flagship “Complex nano-Fluid,” or CnF, is a chemical added to water in hydraulic fracturing operations used to make it easier to pull oil and gas from below ground. Energy Chemistry Technologies accounted for $11.9 million income last quarter. Rig counts and oil prices keep this division on a short, cruel chain.

Second, Flotek buys citrus oil to process and sell to the oil, flavor and fragrances industries. Consumer and Industrial Chemistry accounted for $2.7 million income.

Third, the company builds downhole drilling equipment. Drilling Technologies accounted for a $21 million loss last quarter.

Fourth, Flotek assembles equipment such as rod pump components and valves. This Production division dinged Flotek with a $1.6 million loss last quarter.

 *Why Did The Stock Price Recently Rocket?


Energy Focus: Massive Risks Coming Into Focus

TheStreetSweeper alerts investors that the latest risk associated with Energy Focus Inc. (EFOI) stands to hammer the stock price.

EFOI stock went ballistic today – jumping by $2 in early morning trading to settle in the $16-$17 range. The rise coincided with Roth Capital Partners’ snap decision to raise EFOI’s price target 7 bucks to $23 per share.

While bulls may argue EFOI’s business and margin improvement sparked the analyst’s write-up, we believe something less obvious may be going on here.

Here’s why.

EFOI has in its back pocket $25 million worth of registered stock that it can freely sell to the public at any time.

With its eye on a potential stock offering and seeing the stock price trading around record levels in recent days, we believe Roth saw an opportunity to help push EFOI higher.

Indeed Roth analysts had provided an update the day after EFOI released positive earnings on Aug. 5. So it seems odd that Roth would provide a new release two weeks later with unchanged sales and EPS estimates. No real new information. Just a new head-scratcher price target.

Now that the already over-valued stock has rocketed even higher, Roth figures it’s sitting pretty in the cat-bird seat.


GTT Communications: Seven Reasons To Avoid This Las Vegas-Style Bet

The market has grabbed GTT Communications (NYSE: GTT) under one arm and a fake Elvis under the other and headed for Las Vegas.

Managers have undoubtedly watched in shock as the market slapped a nearly $800 million value on the telecommunications services provider. Never mind that GTT is losing money and its forward price to earnings is an unbelievable 37 to 1. The market still insists on betting on GTT,  humming “Viva Las Vegas” all the way.

But trouble lies ahead. Really, there’s so much trouble all around that a half-dozen happy Elvis impersonators couldn’t even beat the affects of investing in GTT at its current price of ~$22.

Investors may read other viewpoints here. Meanwhile, here are the top seven reasons GTT is due for a haircut and sideburn trim:

*1. From Shell To Risky Roll-up

Many of GTT’s financial issues can be traced back to its very foundation.

The company, formerly called “Mercator Partner Acquisition Corporation,” was simply a shell in 2005, looking for a business to run.

After it settled on providing telecommunications and Internet services, GTT began acquiring companies. It created 45 subsidiaries as it rolled up about half-a-dozen companies into its portfolio - including a division of MegaPath just last February that cost a whopping $144 million plus $7.5 million in GTT stock.

This undoubtedly difficult-to-manage assemblage of small companies has found itself scrambling to compete for a sliver of cloud-based business against established companies such as AT&T, Xo Holdings, Verizon and Microsoft.

TheStreetSweeper has seen many roll-up companies and despises most of them. We have warned investors about the fluctuations and risks associated with roll-ups such as Tangoe (TNGO $19.55 then, now ~$7), Swisher Hygiene (SWSH $8 then, ~$1 now) and Revolution Lighting (RVLT $4 then, now ~$1.).

So now we're inducting GTT into our Rock'n Roll-up Hall of Fame. But, first, let's look at the financial issues that GTT can thank for their help in making this unfortunate honor possible.

*2.Neck-Deep In Debt

GTT depends on a mountain of debt to keep the doors open – and feed its appetite for acquisitions.

(Source: SEC filing 1; 2, 3)

The company is now shouldering $215.6 million in debt. Cash has dwindled to just $19.4 million. So the company's debt is over 10 times the cash in its piggy bank.

Now GTT is loaded with debt and losing buckets of cash.

*3. Net Losses Become Substantial

Indeed, GTT hasn't seen six months' worth of operations in the black since ... yikes! ... 2010.

The chart below, based on SEC filings, shows how GTT has consistently disappointed investors:

So GTT’s losses dramatically deepened beginning in 2013.

In fact, SEC filings indicate the company just suffered the second worst 6-month loss since the company’s inception a decade ago.

*4.Historical Earnings Misses

Last quarter, management credited GTT sales improvement primarily to acquisitions. But investors actually lost 32 cents per share – an enormous miss since Wall Street expected a loss of only 6 cents.


Vonage: Five Top Reasons We're Short This Stock

Billionaire investor Warren Buffett once said, “Price is what you pay. Value is what you get.”

We argue that Vonage Holding Corp. (NYSE:VG) is not delivering on the value as beautifully described by the Oracle of Omaha.

TheStreetSweeper offers this quick hit report on Vonage, provider of a VoIP (voice over Internet protocol) service that uses a customer’s Internet connection to make and receive phone calls via phones or devices. The company’s market cap is $1.37 billion and its price-to-earnings ratio is a stunning 62. Other viewpoints are available here.

Why the stock price jumped

Vonage shares jumped Monday, when Canaccord Genuity initiated coverage on Vonage with a “buy” and a $7.50 price target. The report boosted the already highflying shares about 4 percent to ~$6.49.

Suddenly, Vonage found its stock price in this situation:

Vonage shares are currently beating the consensus price target of $6.31 per share, according to data!

So Vonage could be in a nearly perfect position to plummet at this very moment.

Why we expect the stock to plunge

*Ridiculous insider selling

They say you can judge a man by the way he wears his hat or the shoes he kicks off at the end of the day. We don’t know about that, but we do know that you can usually tell a lot about a company by who is dumping its stock.

In Vonage’s case, company officers and directors are selling their company stock like crazy.


Trupanion: We're Sending This Pet Insurance Company To The Dog House

Stock in Trupanion (NYSE: TRUP) has transformed in recent weeks from a bad, bad dog into the Lassie of the pet insurance world.

But hold onto your leashes. This Seattle, Washington-based company has been quietly growing enormous pit-bull fangs and looks ready to turn on shareholders.

Our executive summary highlights why TheStreetSweeper is bearish on this stock and believes TRUP will ultimately bite those loyal shareholders.

* Hello, 2021: Unraveling TRUP’s numbers reveals up to 23 quarters to wait for the possibility of any meaningful profit.

*TRUP’s insurance product: Negative reviews dog the company.

*Dog-gone bad 16-17 percent margins: Why we shouldn’t be surprised.

*TRUP's “recast” numbers: Can't fix customers' value-to-cost ratio.

*States’ insurance commissioners: Let’s jump TRUP.

*Sell, sell!: Insider unloads company stock.

*Company headquarters: Just embarrassing.

While the company has not responded to TheStreetSweeper’s request for comment, investors may read bullish viewpoints here.

* TRUP’s pet enrollment numbers revelation: Wait ~23 quarters for scale up, any possibility of meaningful profit.

TRUP went public in June 2014 and has suffered significant net losses since inception 16 years ago. But shareholders will sometimes hang in there with a company awhile as long as they can imagine light at the end of a rather short tunnel.

When we ran the numbers, however, we were shocked at how long TRUP investors apparently will have to wait.

Cash flow break-even should happen by mid-2016, CEO Darryl Rawlings said during the May earnings call. But he indicated anything resembling meaningful profitability will come only when TRUP can scale enough to reach 650,000 to 750,000 enrolled pets:

“We manage our business base on cash flow and we are on track to achieve cash flow break even by the middle of next year. Once we achieve operational scale of 650,000 to 750,000 enrolled pets our intention is to have our fixed expense scale as a percentage of revenue and our discretionary margin should continue to expand.”

So the obvious questions are: How many more pets will TRUP need to enroll in its insurance program before they hit the target?

And how long will that take?

TRUP currently reports 241,808 subscription pets enrolled. If the company can stay on track at around 12,500 net additions per quarter (which, if even possible, will likely mean gobbling up millions more in marketing), it should take TRUP somewhere around 14 quarters to 23 quarters to hit the target.

Yipes ...That’s about three to six years.

That means TRUP should reach the target sometime between the years 2018 and 2021!

At that rate, TRUP is expecting investors to be phenomenally patient.

Particularly if we factor in the stock performance (down ~30%, depicted by the blue line) versus the Dow (up ~2%), NASDAQ (up 5%) and S&P 500 (up~14%) over the past year, as shown below.


Tucows: Why Its New Internet Business Will Hand Investors A Cow Patty

You’ve almost gotta love Tucows (NASDAQ: TCX) for its humor, as demonstrated by the company reportedly taking a real cow to a conference, plus its depiction of two cows in its logo:

But the negatives inherent in Tucows’ business plan utterly outweigh its funny personality.

The stock for this Toronto, Canada-based domain name registrar and wireless service provider has been running wild and crazy the past two months. Indeed, Tucows jumped over the moon at $32 on July 21 and then began declining somewhat. The stock is now on the brink of turning around and trampling investors before they can jump out of its path.

Before Tucows hooks another one, check out our executive summary briefly describing the top reasons we think Tucows’ stock price is ready to drop.

*Executive Summary

*Troubled Trio – The company reports two operating segments - domain services, consisting of domain name registration, and network access services, consisting of both retail mobile phones/services and Internet service over fiber networks. Tucows faces growing challenges in all areas.

*Faltering Fiber – The stock rallied on announcements of Tucows’ entry into the Internet business. But Tucows lacks the multi-millions to build a fiber network. And our research shows the Ting fiber business won’t produce meaningful revenue now … and probably not ever.

*Yelling “Sell!” – Insiders have been hitting the sell button on Tucows’ stock.

*Crumbling Core - Tucows’ core Internet domain name business is flat and poised for further decline. The business has become vastly more competitive and commoditized, so customers buy principally on price. 


Glu Mobile: Kim K Trips, New Games Disappoint, Key Insider Sells Amid Crazy P/E

Her stilettos flashing and iPhone snapping selfies, Kim Kardashian is  racing out in front, with Deer Hunter close behind, and Racing Rivals bringing up the rear. But wait … No, no. It can’t be…Yes, yes, America’s dashing diva is slowing now as, in one fell swoop, she whips out a tiny mirror, smears pink lip plumper on that famous kisser and checks out the scenery behind her. Slowing, slowing, slowing. Stumble…

In the wacky world of mobile game making, Glu Mobile (NASDAQ: GLUU) is in a constant mad dash for gamers’ hearts and fingertips.

But Glu’s top three games “Kim Kardashian: Hollywood,” “Deer Hunter 2014,” and “Racing Rivals” are now declining, according to App Annie data.

And that decline is just the first warning flag amid a mile-long parade of red flags viciously snapping at Glu.

The company has not responded to TheStreetSweeper’s request for comment, but investors may find other viewpoints here.

Meanwhile, here’s a quick executive summary:

*Executive Summary

*Hopped up on hype. Glu Mobile’s stock is up on hoped-for hits and the company’s enthusiastic guidance.

*Declining stars. Glu’s three top games drive the bulk of past and current revenues. But they are in a slow decline.

*Recent games disappoint. Games launched so far this year are turning in disappointing numbers. And games currently in soft launch are getting surprisingly poor rankings, too.

*Key insider selling. A director who was an original investor also manages a fund that is now dumping the majority of its shares in Glu.

*Crazy P/E: Glu’s price-to-forward earnings is an outlandish 74, while the P/E is about 20 for two competitors and the industry as a whole.

*Should guide lower: Overall, we expect Glu leaders will need to lower sales guidance for the third quarter and potentially the entire year.

Indeed, we believe Glu shares are poised to decline faster than a broken stiletto can drop any dashing diva. Here’s why:

*Current Stars Decline


La Jolla Pharmaceutical: Lost Opportunity, Insider Questions Should Chop Valuation By Well Over Half

*Executive Summary

*The stock primarily owes its price to enthusiasm over insider buying. However, that insider’s large block trade orders sparked a market manipulation investigation that led to his broker being sanctioned, temporarily losing his license and paying tens of thousands in fines.

*Though La Jolla had to shelve its most promising drug candidate, analysts haven’t revised price targets to reflect the massive decline in market opportunity.

*With La Jolla’s history of missed, terrible earnings, even bullish analysts anticipate horrible earnings into the foreseeable future.

*With little real institutional interest, anyway, more shares recently have been sold out than new positions added.

*Our calculations suggest the remaining market opportunity for La Jolla is a fraction of analysts’ projections.


Kornit Digital Update: Top Competitor Acquisition Signals KRNT's Vast Risks, Overvaluation

TheStreetSweeper alerts investors on the very latest negative event subsequent to our Monday report on the massive risks facing Kornit Digital (KRNT) - an event that justifies a stock price decline to below $5 per share.

A top competitor, Italy-based Reggiani has been acquired by Electronics for Imaging for about $84.2 million, plus ~$56.2 million over 30 months of milestone achievements.  

The deal presents two big negative implications for Israeli inkjet printing company, Kornit. These are particularly worrisome just as the company tries to make the critical expansion from the T-shirt makers’ market into the roll-to-roll market. Roll-to-roll printers allow images to be printed on fabrics that are then sewn into garments, wallpaper, furniture coverings, etc.

First, Reggiani, already a top rival whose sales jumped 61 percent between 2012 and 2013 to ~$76 million, will likely become a roll-to-roll gorilla.

The acquisition by Electronics for Imaging (EFII) means the rebranded EFI Reggiani will be able to use the money and advanced distribution channels afforded by EFII. So it will negatively impact Kornit’s future potential – as Kornit tries to get its commercial roll-to-roll printer launched in about 18 months.

Second, this deal should have a downward effect on Kornit’s valuation today.

The deal means EFII is unwilling to pay an acquisition anything close to Kornit’s current ~6 times revenue and ~50 times EBITDA.

Indeed, EFII has shown that it’s willing to pony up only 1.8 times revenue and 7-12 times EBITDA. That means, it would pay no more than about $56 million to $127 million for Kornit, which equals $1.88 to $4.26 per share


Kornit Digital: Inkjet Printer Company Attempting To Trade At 3-D Printer Valuation, Riddled With Risk

Israeli printer company Kornit Digital (KRNT), swung into the inkjet printing jungle as a $16 million acquisition that went public last April. In the shifting eyes of the market, it grew up almost overnight into a nearly half-a-billion dollar beast.

But, with fangs bared, a snarling threat lies in wait for Kornit shareholders. The market has been led to misunderstand Kornit’s true business.

Kornit is a small manufacturer of inkjet printers used to print images and designs directly onto T-shirts and other garments.

Yet the market has slapped a ~$400 million valuation on this small inkjet printer company that last quarter posted just $17.6 million revenue and a $200,000 net loss. Why?

“You wouldn’t be able to IPO a $16 million company at huge valuation if you didn’t throw out some nice buzz words,” an analyst told TheStreetSweeper.

The buzz word is 3-D printers. Some analysts have compared Kornit with 3-D printer companies, prompting widespread misunderstanding and baseless exuberance about Kornit’s potential.

So, while investors may find other viewpoints here, below is an executive summary of why we think Kornit is one of the worst creatures in the jungle. Then we’ll move on to our key points.

*Executive Summary

*Misunderstood Hype - Due to analyst hype, the market erroneously believes inkjet printer Kornit is a 3-D printing company and has assigned a correspondingly ridiculous valuation – a valuation we believe Kornit cannot possibly grow into.

*Not 3-D - Using a commercially available printer head and boasting just ~7 patents, Kornit printers lack the “specialness” to possibly justify any comparison to 3-D printers.

*Overvalued - Kornit trades at an outlandish 50 times EBITDA and ~68 times earnings; both are close to 10 times pricier than comparable companies.

*Killer Competitors - Gorilla rivals such as Aeoon, Brothers, Epson and many others are stomping Kornit in the direct-to-garment area that serves custom T-shirt companies. Kornit’s signature “Breeze” printer costs twice as much as a top rival’s and prints on about the same number of T-shirts per hour.

*Late To Market - Kornit wants to pursue roll-to-roll (R2R) printing on fabric, but four years after introducing its Allegro solution, the commercial launch may still be 18 months out. Worse, a sole supplier issue could threaten both direct-to-garment and roll-to-roll products. Meanwhile, Dover, Durst and Konica Minolta are dominating this area.

*Dilution Appears Imminent - Kornit will likely lose significant ground even before the September stock lockup expiration, potentially unleashing millions of shares onto the market. See “Final Bone-Crusher: Stock Overhang” below to get the overhang details. A controlling shareholder could cash in essentially a pennies-on-the-dollar transaction at current stock prices.

*$6 Target Price – At ~$13 a share, creating a $387 million market cap for a company with a pathetic $4.6 million in the bank, it only makes sense for Kornit to fill its money chest with capital raised now. So we wouldn’t be surprised to see the stock drop off the cliff to $6 a share. And even that is extremely generous.


Uranium Energy Corporation: The Bad News Buried In The Recent Sale

Uranium mining company Uranium Energy Corp (UEC) is digging all the love it’s getting from the market right now. But after we mined into company documents, we couldn’t resist humming the cowboy song, “You Done Tore Out My Heart and Stomped That Sucker Flat.”

Uranium Energy looks ready to do just that to investors.

The company has not responded to TheStreetSweeper’s request for comment but investors may find other viewpoints here. Meanwhile, we’ve leaned on some ol’ country songs to help us croon out the risks.

*”If The Jukebox Took Teardrops,” Or Market’s Feeling The Pain

While UEC stock is up, the company’s peers are all down.

Yahoo Finance)

The reason the sector’s performance remains so terrible is because uranium spot prices of about $36 are at a five-year low, as shown below.


TheStreetSweeper Quick Hit: Northwest Biotherapeutics (NWBO) Desperation

TheStreetSweeper issues an alert about a desperate situation occurring at Northwest Biotherapeutics (NWBO). The biotech’s recently hyped effort – early Phase 1 data for its experimental cancer tumor injectable shows 27 of 39 patients remain alive after up to 18 months after injection - comes at a heavy, perhaps even fatal cost.

NWBO retained the services of Cognate BioServices to conduct clinical trials and associated work. Now, Cognate has hit up NWBO for $8.2 million and the biotech is coming up short. It still owed Cognate $5.8 million as of March 31.

This is just the latest in a series of stunning negatives, including:

*1. Cash has plummeted to just $3.2 million.

*2. Cash burn hit ~$17 million.

*3. Working capital deficit soared to $86 million.

*4. CEO Linda F. Powers’ company bio doesn’t mention it, but Ms. Powers was Enron’s senior vice president for global operations, though she wasn’t implicated in the scandal. She controls NWBO’s major funding sources Toucan Capital and Toucan Partners, holders of ~4% of outstanding shares.

*5. Expensive lawsuits have gone in NWBO’s favor and against it, such as a class-action securities lawsuit alleging the company issued misleading press releases. NWBO agreed to settle for $1 million. NWBO also received demand letters from shareholders seeking access to books with the intention of investigating possible mismanagement and breaches of fiduciary duty.

*6. Market value is $760 million. With just 12 full-time employees, the company last year spent $85.6 million in R&D and $16.9 million in general and administrative.

*7. Extremely promising competing therapeutics are undergoing testing by Stanford and numerous companies.

*8. Serious doubts exist about NWBO’s survival, according to its SEC filings:

“Because of recurring operating losses, net operating cash flow deficits, and an accumulated deficit there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

*9. NWBO’s 10-K filing warns: “We will need to raise substantial funds, on an ongoing basis…”

Indeed, it adds: “Any financing will involve issuance of equity and/or debt, and such issuances will be dilutive to existing shareholders.”

*10. Operating losses exceeded its abysmal revenue – a $194,000 research grant - by a factor of 117:


eMagin: Imagine This Stock Collapsing Below $1

Looking for all the world like a virtual reality gamer, eMagin Corp. (EMAN) has been virtually running in place ever since the introduction of its first microdisplay 14 long years ago.

And now one of the OLED (organic light emitting diode) display maker’s greatest rivals has reached across and hit eMagin’s reverse button … stealing a Navy contract right out from under its nose.

This – and additional adversity – will likely squash the almost flat revenue anticipated for 2015. Though EMAN just turned a slight profit after seven straight quarters of losses, these challenges suggest it may have a tough time hanging onto that oh-so-tenuous profitability.

Investors may check out other viewpoints here, which include bullish points such as EMAN will gain government contracts, improve compared to rivals and find growth opportunities. 

Meanwhile, we’ll hit the top reasons EMAN’s virtual shoot-out will likely end badly. We’re looking for the stock price to drop below $1 because:

*1. Yowza! Trading At 100 Times Earnings?!?

The most bullish analyst estimates EMAN’s earnings will reach 3 cents per share for the year. So that means investors are paying an astronomical 100 times more than the earnings they expect to receive.  

That’s a lot considering the fact that EMAN is a little OLED microdisplay maker with declining revenue - not one of the highflying biotechs working on a cure for cancer.

We’ll save the multiple we’re generously projecting for EMAN for the conclusion of this article.


Cracking The Code On DigiMarc (DMRC): Deteriorating Business Will Continue To Decline - Part 2

Barcode technology company Digimarc faces even more challenges beyond those detailed in TheStreetSweeper’s part 1, including:

*Digimarc’s Discover remains undiscovered

Digimarc hopes it can advance its Digimarc Discover – designed to combine “invisible” barcode technology and media experiences - sufficiently to fill in the gaps left by declining revenue from major customers such as Intellectual Ventures, whose license payments have ended and consulting fees will end this year. But that appears unlikely.

Why? There are three major reasons.

*Negative reviews

*First, most reviewers had problems with the quality of Digimarc Discover.

In fact, most of the 986 Appszoom reviews of the product were negative, giving Discover a measly ranking of 1 ½ stars:

(Source: AppsZoom)

Meanwhile, the majority of reviewers gave the product 1 star out of 5 stars at, though it did make a total of 2.9 stars.  

Photographer, webmaster and gear reviewer Ken Rockwell is not impressed with Digimarc Discover, either. He said the product degrades images, requires larger compressed JPEG files, is not invisible and offers many disadvantages.

*Turning the pack

Second, groups such as product manufacturers, scanner makers, package printers and retailers have to be convinced to switch from their current barcode.

Manufacturers would face additional costs to switch to a different barcode. Retailers who would like to use the Digimarc barcode would face the costly, time-consuming effort of adding camera capabilities to all scanners, as well as expensive fees.

This chart breaks down the cost of Digimarc’s $350 setup fee per code and $50 per year maintenance fee with the UPC barcode costs:


# of items needing UPC barcode

Initial fee $

Yearly  fee $

Total $

# of items needing DigiMarc barcode

Initial fee $

Yearly fee $

Total $

























Up to 10,000








Up to 100,000




Up to 100,000




(Sources: Seeking Alpha, GS1 US)

So, understandably, retailers would balk at plunking down as much as 3,000 times more for Digimarc’s barcode than for the current low-cost, perfectly capable barcode.

*Walmart failure offers sad model

Third, Walmart’s infamous barcode replacement attempt serves as a model of disappointment.


Cracking The Code On DigiMarc (DMRC): Deteriorating Business Will Continue To Decline

Though Digimarc Corp. (DMRC) revenue dropped to a five-year low and some licensing deals have fallen apart, executives have raked in more than $6 million in compensation and sold shares like crazy.

CEO Bruce Davis even got a raise in November, bringing his base salary to $600,000

Include Mr. Davis’s stock awards and 401-K contributions, and it all adds up to $3.39 million.

Not only that but, if and when his job ends, Mr. Davis will receive at least $600,000 yearly for two years after termination.

Meanwhile, three other top executives just had another $260,000 worth of stock apiece added to their compensation packages, bringing their total compensation to nearly $800,000 apiece.

And, just for attending up to five board meetings a year, Digimarc’s four directors each received compensation in the $150,000 range.

Ultimately, compensation for executives and directors in 2014 consumed a jaw-dropping 26 percent of total revenue.

While investors may read exclusively bullish viewpoints here on the Beaverton, Oregon “invisible” barcode maker, we’ll hit on other concerns expected to ultimately send this highflyer crashing back to reality.

*Insiders yell “Sell!”


PlasmaTech Biopharmaceuticals: Hyped Up ... Old "News" ... Going Down

PlasmaTech Biopharmaceuticals (PTBI) rocketed on “news” that the FDA granted orphan drug status to its newly acquired gene therapy products.

But PTBI’s announcement is simply hype churned out to raise the stock price … which is exactly what it did.

Why would we claim this is nothing more than a stock-hyping promotion?

The products had already received orphan drug designations – and been announced.

One full year ago.

Here’s the headline:

Abeona Therapeutics Receives U.S. Orphan Drug Designations for treatment of Sanfilippo Syndromes A and B”

PTBI announced May 6 that it would acquire Abeona, along with the acquisition’s therapy for Sanfilippo Syndromes A and B.  Two weeks later, PTBI issued its press release making it sound as if it had just received the US Food and Drug Administration designation for the therapies, here.

PTBI said FDA granted the designation for PTBI’s “lead product candidates for the treatment of Sanfilippo Syndromes A and B.” Orphan drug designation makes it easier to gain marketing approval to treat a rare medical condition or “orphan disease.”

PTBI’s new CEO, Tim Miller, Abeona’s former CEO, is quoted in both the current and the year-old release.  

Indeed, the FDA website shows both experimental drugs, here and here, received “orphan designation” in May 2014. An FDA spokeswoman noted they are not yet FDA approved for sale.

As for the Rare Pediatric Disease designation that PTBI says it has also received, a PTBI corporate presentation suggests Abeona had already received the designation. Spokeswoman Sandy Walsh said the FDA does not disclose the names of companies that request or receive this type of designation.

But this is just the beginning of a long list of issues that we believe will soon ground the PTBI rocket.

While investors may find other viewpoints here, we’ll tick off additional reasons we believe this stock is on the verge of crashing back to earth.

*Promotions:  “There’s no such thing as bad publicity.” Or is there?

PTBI stock has also been hyped recently by promotional firms like Blue Horseshoe Stocks, here, and posted on associated newsletter sites such as here and other sites.       

Seeking Alpha also has published two PTBI articles in the last few weeks, both fairly bullish and written by the same author.

On May 18, contributor to touted the Soros investment and the initiation on a “buy” by H.C. Wainwright.

DLS Research, owner of SmithOnStocks, has also promoted PTBI, when the pharmaceutical company was called Access Pharmaceuticals. Investors may check here, where a Seeking Alpha author took DLS to task.

And HotStocked is yet another business that has trumpeted PTBI.

Investing in companies that must rely on stock promoters to get more eyeballs on their stock is risky business. Other company investors have taken the advice of promoters, such as Jonathan Lebed. TheStreetSweeper wrote about the Lebed-promoted Jive in 2012, which ended in disaster for virtually everyone but the Lebed team (JIVE, then ~$24, now ~$5.55).

*Bad News: Shark Tank’s Mr. Wonderful says, “It’s all about the moneeeey!”

PTBI last year increased cash by cutting expenses such as its lifeblood - research and development – and diluting shareholders’ stock. Its accounts payable rose and revenue collapsed.

Here are more details:


Dec. 31, 2014

Dec. 31, 2013

% Change

Net Income/Loss

$-26.8 m

$4.5 m

Down 702%


$    .9 m

$2.0 m

Down 122%

Accounts payable

$  1.9 m

$  .9 m

Up 120%

Research & Dev.

$    .3 m

$  .9 m

Down 62%

 (Source: SEC filings)

PTBI blames losses on R&D:

“Our losses have resulted principally from costs incurred in research and development activities …and from associated administrative costs.”

Then PTBI turned around and noted a few pages later that R&D dropped more than half-a-million bucks!

Indeed, those “associated administrative costs” really mean stock-based compensation jumped astronomically.

In fact, stock-based compensation nearly tripled.

For their hand in running the company that’s now lost $298 million, PTBI folks received $1.3 million in stock-based compensation.


Dec. 31, 2014

Dec. 31, 2013

Percent Change

Stock-based comp

$1.3 m

$0.4 m

Up 197%


Wowser! The deeper the hole, the better the pay.

Full compensation is hard to track in PTBI’s game of executive musical chairs but new CEO Miller will receive $350,000 yearly, along with a possible bonus and stock options for 400,000 shares worth around $3.5 million.

Another big player who has sat in several chairs and handled at least five of PTBI’s private stock offerings through his SCO Securities, is Steven Rouhandeh, executive chairman.

PTBI’s filings note this about SCO entities linked to Mr. Rouhandeh: “During 2014 and 2013, SCO and affiliates charged $300,000 each year in investor relations fees.”

Mr. Rouhandeh’s stock option awards for 2014? Those alone were worth $523,000.

In fact, Mr. Rouhandeh and his SCO entities own over 14 million shares, exceeding a whopping 65 percent ownership.

*What About Soros?

News on May 5-7 regarding the George Soros disclosure of 1.16 million shares or 5. 17 percent of PTBI evidently prompted some investors to take a chance on the stock, assisting the rally to $9.

But that stock cost Soros a fraction of what today’s retail investor is paying. The Soros fund’s increased position works out to a price of ~$3 per share for one block of 250,000 shares and ~$0.93 per share for the second block, according to the fund’s SEC filing.

And the position in PTBI is extremely small.

The Soros fund lists stock held in ~230 companies in the last quarter, records show. The fund includes many positions of those other companies of 10 million or more shares accumulated in that timeframe.

Is Soros still holding a position in PTBI now that the stock is about three times or more than the purchase price?

Fund managers have not yet responded to TheStreetSweeper’s request for a comment. But how long Soros might hold onto PTBI shares is a burning question, particularly considering the current price and all the institutional types selling PTBI.

*Top Investors Dump PTBI Stock

Three out of PTBI’s five biggest institutional investors have begun dumping its stock. These are Oracle, Sabby and Deerfield.    

A total of seven institutional holders have whittled away at their holdings. PTBI’s biggest institutional investor, Oracle, has axed its shares to nearly half the original number. Two other institutions, Equitec and Messner & Smith, have sold out.


InterCloud Systems: Form D, Other Stormy Issues Threaten This Non-Cloud Company

InterCloud Systems (ICLD) stock blew through low-hanging clouds on a recent small contract award and today’s announcement of an effort to improve clients’ experience.

But InterCloud is in such dire financial straits that top executives and directors just filed notice for the sale of $3 million in stock.

And that is just the most recent of numerous stormy issues promising to dissipate InterCloud’s stock and leave stockholders drenched without an umbrella in sight.  

Here are some bullish viewpoints for investors to consider. Meanwhile, below are the top cloud-busters that make us hate this stock:

*Reality Check Number 1: New Form D Filing, Horrible Financials

InterCloud’s CEO, President, Chief Accounting Officer, Chief Financial Officer and three directors signed off this week on the newest stock offering of $3 million through Aegis Capital. Disclosed under Form D, the first date of sale of the stock occurred May 14.

This may be just the beginning of such efforts for InterCloud. The company’s net income plummeted 200 percent last quarter versus a year ago. So net income dropped from $10.4 million to $-10.3 million.

Indeed, the company’s income, EBITDA and other metrics fall well below competitors and the industry as a whole, as shown here.

The company’s history of incredibly bad earnings and earnings misses, sometimes over 1000 percent, is shown here and below:

 (Source: Yahoo Finance)

*Reality Check Number 2: History Of Loan Defaults; Massive Maturing, Related-Party Debt.


Chanticleer Holdings (HOTR): Turning Down The Fire

Chanticleer Holdings (HOTR) has recently been scorching hot. Yet its business plan is so cold, it could have frozen the raunchy wit right off legendary sex symbol Mae West.

But let’s assume she would have fluttered her eyelashes, patted a blond wave and recovered quickly enough to reveal the secrets of the North Carolina company that owns 46 company-owned and franchise locations, including 13 Hooters, six American Burger Co. restaurants, plus seven Just Fresh and 20 BGR locations.

We’ll let Mae and other voluptuous sirens help unveil some risks slinking up on HOTR.

*HOTR’s Nothing Without You, Seeking Alpha.

“Plastic surgeons are always making mountains out of molehills,” Dolly Parton once said. When it comes to HOTR, just substitute “Seeking Alpha authors” for “plastic surgeons” and you get the idea.

In an interview with the chief executive published April 16, for example, a Seeking Alpha author prompted CEO Mike Pruitt to hype HOTR’s far-from-beautiful financials this way:

“When profitability is reached, what is your philosophy on use of cash? Returned via cash dividends or buybacks, or 100% retained for possible future acquisitions? When do you expect the company to be in a position to return cash to shareholders?”

Really? Profitability? Following year after year of losses, now exceeding $21 million? Mr. Pruitt replied:


Clean Diesel Technologies: Burning Cash, Emitting Spotted History and Financials

If a company’s business is so flimsy that optimistic analysts must resort to commenting on the company’s “body language” for good results, you know you’re in for a ride.

But if you dare look past Clean Diesel Technologies’ (CDTI) body language into the financials, rapidly dying legacy products, the emissions funding problems, lost tax credits, fleeing CFO, historical allegations of behavior believed detrimental to shareholders validated by federal regulators’ orders – and SEC charges against a CDTI promoter – you know it has all the markings of one short, unforgettable, miserable ride.

CDTI manufactures and distributes emission control systems and products for the light-duty vehicle and heavy-duty diesel market. The bull thesis contends the company will make progress in transforming its business and will make commercial strides with its DuraFit offering. Roth Capital, which notes it expects to receive or intends to seek business with CDTI in the next three months, reiterated its “buy” rating in a research report sent to investors Wednesday morning. With the stock sitting at about $2.17, Roth set a $2.50 price target.  

Investors should check out other viewpoints here while we describe our concerns about CDTI and why we think the stock price should collapse.

*Terrible Financials

Investors may see in the table below that CDTI’s financial picture worsened in all three important areas:


Gevo: Cash Issues Resemble Another Big Loser, Dilution Pro -- Viggle

TheStreetSweeper issues a Gevo (GEVO) Quick Hit.

Just a month after Gevo’s board approved the desperate 1-to-15 reverse stock split that pushed the stock from ~$0.18 to ~$2, Gevo may be primed for a stock offering.

The stock is rallying today, yet the renewable fuels company is money-starved with only $4.4 million in cash. As it burns through about $10 million per quarter, it may have problems meeting its financial obligations.

This looks like another Viggle (VGGL) situation. Viggle, too, faces massive debt, low cash and going concern issues. We tweeted a VGGL update on Monday. See below:

“Troubling $VGGL rally on earnings! Cash dropped to $715,000. Burns ~$6m/Q, now needs $19m over current cash. We’re short.”

Sure enough, today the company filed a registration statement for $40-million of stock. That stock is down as much as ~30 percent since Monday.

We’re feeling a sense of déjà vu.

Gevo just reported a net loss of $7.3 million and accumulated losses of $310.6 million, and, while it anticipates $6 million in proceeds from warrants, it’s feeling the pressure of interest payments for $26 million in debt coming up in 2017 and $24.9 million in 2022.


QuinStreet: A Wreck Right Around The Corner

One minute, QuinStreet (NASDAQ:QNST) was merrily redirecting traffic from Google searches and picking up millions along the way in exchange for generating leads.

The next minute, two trucks flew around the corner, with President Obama at the wheel of one and Google at the other. Wham!

Once investors understand the true impact of that double-whammy, we think they'll agree that QuinStreet's business model looks like a beat-up, old jalopy. We'll explain why below but investors should also take a look at opposing viewpoints here.

*Losing customers: A flick of President Obama's pen and shuttered colleges

QuinStreet gets paid for gathering information when people type in something like "online college degree," or "credit cards," or "cheap car insurance," and then generating online sales leads for for-profit schools, credit card companies and auto insurance companies.

But QuinStreet's Education division is clearly taking several huge hits - hits that promise to thwart future revenue in this area.

For example, President Obama veered into QuinStreet's business with his plan for free community college.

This plan would damage QuinStreet's for-profit education customer base going forward because many of the people who might appreciate the flexibility of a for-profit college would enroll in community college if it became free.

Just as ominously, federal and state regulators are cracking down on QuinStreet's for-profit higher education customer. A US Senate committee revealed a disturbing investigation into for-profit education. And attorney generals across the country have been investigating these colleges' "dubious practices."

Corinthian Colleges (COCO) filed for bankruptcy last week amid federal allegations it deceived students.

The US Department of Education forced Corinthian - already slapped with a $30 million fine - to close the last of its campuses just a few weeks ago.

With $6 billion in federal student loans and grants, Corinthian was a significant client for QuinStreet. Its loss was not reflected in QuinStreet's last earnings.

Corinthian proved to be the canary in the for-profit college mine, signaling the intensifying implosion of the industry. Along with Corinthian, Career Education Corp. and Education Management Corp. fell beneath federal regulators' crackdown against colleges allegedly taking advantage of low income students and hitting them with debt. Regulators have left behind massive campuses closings, Education Management's delisting itself from Nasdaq and a loss of nearly $8 billion in market valuation.

Here is the combined stock chart for Career Education (CECO) and Corinthian Colleges (COCO):


Clean Energy Fuels: The Dirty Truth

That horrifying noise assaulting investors’ ears is the sound of Clean Energy Fuels (CLNE) braking and swerving in the middle of the highway.

TheStreetSweeper is convinced it’s time to get out of Clean’s path while we still can.

Enamored with clean energy, investors found it easy to buy into Clean on fourth quarter results showing a bump in revenue.  At first we, too, were almost charmed by the provider of natural gas – compressed (CNG) and liquefied (LNG) – for long-haul trucks, buses, taxis, etc.

But when we broke out our toolbox, we discovered a wreck that will remain too banged up to make the long haul. Investors may find other viewpoints here, as we highlight the top risks poised to run down Clean Energy shareholders.

*1. Look under the hood: financials

First, the bump in revenue to $132 million wasn’t really the outperformance many thought. Check page 16 of its federal filing and note where $28.4 million of revenue came from: “federal fuel tax credits” which “expired on December 31, 2014.” Plus, another $12 million came from another one-time gain – the sale of Clean’s interest in a Dallas biomethane plant.

Second, gross profit per gallon declined to $0.26. That’s 2 cents less than the quarter before and 5 cents less than the prior year.

Gross profit was expected to be $0.29, according to Piper Jaffray’s Alexander Potter and Winnie Dong – who called a $3.25 price target on Sunday, March 1, 2015. Clean had just closed at $6.01.  

“We are growing increasingly skeptical that this key metric can/will eventually rise,” analysts wrote of the gross profit.

Third, Clean’s adjusted EBITDA was not positive. It was actually negative at -$3.2 million.

Clean actually had a loss of $0.01, while firms like Raymond James were looking for positive earnings of $0.05.

The bull case accounts for a relatively strong balance sheet and that Clean should be able to reach positive cash flow.

But we strongly believe Clean’s financials should have sent investors racing …. For the exits.

*2. LNG bet goes up in smoke. Clean Energy has placed a bet that long-haul trucking would easily switch from diesel to liquefied natural gas. But that has not happened.


CHOP: Steel Company’s Shares Ready For The Chopping Block

The future of a Chinese steel company teeters atop a pile of porcelain artwork.

Those fragile pieces are the latest elements straining to prop up China Gerui Advanced Materials Group (CHOP).

The company says it intends to eventually sell porcelain pieces in hopes of saving the steel business.

But the hammers are raised and threaten to shatter CHOP’s last-ditch efforts.

TheStreetSweeper highlights the cash burn, business shift, lawsuit allegations, and other issues that we believe make CHOP shares worth a couple of quarters or maybe even, as one analyst said, “zero.”

Meanwhile, investors may find other viewpoints here about the Chinese cold-rolled steel manufacturer. The company’s thin steel product – sometimes only as wide as a human hair – is sold to the Chinese food packaging, electrical appliances and construction materials industries.

CHOP has not yet responded to TheStreetSweeper’s request for an interview.

*Virtually no cash left

CHOP has been burning through a mountain of cash – about $240 million in three quarters or $80 million per quarter - the company now reports just $2.3 million of unrestricted cash and $50 million in restricted cash remaining. At the current unbelievable burn rate, CHOP must find more operating money soon.

*History of massive revenue decline, debt problems and recent cash-poor position

CHOP shares suddenly rocketed from 70 cents apiece to about $4, in opposition to the direction of the company’s cash and revenue.

The company’s revenue has been spiraling downward for some time, as shown in the company’s Securities and Exchange Commission filings:

  Filed Jan. 6, 2015:


Third Quarter 2014 Results Revenue decreased 90.0% to $3.1 million in the third quarter of 2014 from $30.9 million in the third quarter of 2013. Nine Months 2014 Results Revenue was $62.2 million in the first nine months of 2014 compared with $119.6 million in the first nine months of 2013…As of June 30, 2014, the Company had $3.0 million in unrestricted cash…


The company also posted a loss of $6 million in the third quarter. Noting its one-for-ten reverse stock split, the company blamed poor results on low steel prices, declining sales, credit problems, downtime of production lines, bank loan defaults and working capital shortages.  

 Filed Sept. 4, 2014:

Second Quarter Results Revenue decreased 24.1% to $32.7 million in the second quarter of 2014 from $43.1 million in the second quarter of 2013. Gross profit decreased 51.8% to $1.7 million in the second quarter of 2014 from $3.5 million in the same quarter of 2013.

Gross margin was 5.2% … Operating loss was $0.6 million…Net loss was $1.4 million.

 Filed May 20, 2014:


First Quarter Results Revenue decreased 42.0% to $26.4 million in the first quarter of 2014 from $45.6 million in the first quarter of 2013. Gross profit decreased 123.9% to ($1.2 million) in the first quarter of 2014 from $5.2 million in the same quarter of 2013.


The chart from Bloomberg below, presents a vivid image of CHOP’s perilous cash position, plummeting from about $200 million or more in the second quarter of 2012 through the first quarter last year, down to a few million in the second and third quarters of 2014:


Inuvo: Top Reasons This Stock Should Dive

Arkansas-based Inuvo (INUV) is working in a business that elicits the same level of enthusiasm as, say, receiving a dinnertime call from a telemarketer or getting a visit from a solicitor peddling a coat-full of fake Rolex watches.

INUV and its peers have seen some doors slammed on their businesses previously. And this Internet marketing and technology company could see many more slammed doors in the near future.

Let’s look at INUV’s background and then get right to the top reasons TheStreetSweeper is watching for a decline in INUV’s stock – likely below the $2 level.

Investors should also take a look at other viewpoints on INUV here.


Recent hype that Google and Yahoo have renewed deals with INUV are actually quite routine. Virtually all companies in this space have a relationship with the two Internet search providers, though these relationships seem to change rather often.

A big change occurred a few years ago in the toolbar business that was making millions for INUV and others. The Internet version of the solicitor banging on the door at dinnertime, these toolbars automatically installed when you downloaded a video. A search in the toolbar would be an INUV search, powered by Yahoo or Google. And the revenues from ad clicks were shared by the toolbar vendor and the search company.

But Google made a small change that drastically dropped toolbar downloads. Bye-bye searches with random Kim Kardashian rear-end pix popping up. Bye-bye key market opportunity for INUV and peers.

So INUV transitioned out of toolbar downloads. The company now focuses on the digital publishing business and building ads for other web publishers.

CEO Richard Howe told TheStreetSweeper that INUV works at keeping fresh, interesting content in its properties focusing on health, finance, careers, travel and local interests.

“On the ad tech side, the key there is really to build new and better ad units,” he said. “These would be ads that you see on the website when you go visit the website. You may think they’re ads that just sit there and don’t do anything, but the ones that perform the best have some sort of intelligence behind them.”

A long-time analyst in this space scoffed, “At the end of the day, these are banner ads.”

It’s such a fast-moving space that it even sometimes gets ahead of INUV. In one slightly awkward moment during the interview, we wondered about the “” that INUV promoted in its February corporate presentation, on page 8, here. We couldn’t find it in our Internet search.

“Sometimes publishers leave, right? So we may … need to revise the presentation,” said Mr. Howe, noting someone else mentioned the same thing this week. “I’ve got to go look into why.”

*Stock offering? CEO says, “It’s certainly something that our board is now talking about.”

Mr. Howe told TheStreetSweeper that a stock offering has not been “something we have contemplated up until now.”

He said the board hadn’t considered a raise before because they didn’t want to cause dilution since it wasn’t necessary.

“It’s not like we need the money,” he added.

“Now that the stock price is rising, while we haven’t decided to do an equity raise, it’s certainly something that our board is now talking about,” said Mr. Howe.

He wouldn’t elaborate, of course, on exactly how soon a stock offering might happen.

“Whether that means we’ll do it or not, is a whole other story. And, like I said, we’re certainly not in any hurry to do it,” added Mr. Howe.

*Striking decline in INUV’s website traffic.

The number of unique visitors, so vital to growth for companies like INUV, has shown a stunning decline of about 50 percent for INUV over a year. See the chart below, measuring the traffic to INUV’s, according to the “Nielsen of website traffic,”


UniPixel: This Steamroller Is About To Squash Investors

Many of today’s investors, one sage noted, seem to be picking up pennies in front of a steamroller.

Specifically, UniPixel (UNXL) is gunning its engine and we think that big machine is just about to flatten unfortunate investors - again.

The Woodlands, Texas company makes touchscreen film for electronic devices and a hard coat protective film for various uses. The stock just recently emerged from a two-year-long drop from about $40 to the recent ~$6.70.

The initial run-up two years ago escalated on news of a UniPixel-Kodak partnership announcement that April, targeting year-end 2013 to begin reeling out rolls of film to make touchscreens respond to touch. This seemed to validate the technology. Never mind that Kodak and Kingsbury Corp. released a very similar announcement two months later about their partnership that, apparently unlike the UniPixel deal, has landed a sale. And no one knew then that the UniPixel-Kodak roll-out would hit multiple delays and not happen until … well, everyone’s still waiting two years later. Regardless, the stock lingered in the $30-$40 range.

Later in 2013, the stock began cratering amid a pile of reports suggesting problems including excessive promotions, misallocation of capital, repeated delays, heavy competition, disappointing technology, questionable insiders (see a bull’s interesting response here), along with class-action lawsuits, including one later dismissed and others settled.

And it was all capped off by the Securities and Exchange Commission issuing subpoenas on Nov. 19, 2013 in connection with some UniPixel sensor agreements, hurtling the stock down to around $12 and gradually trailing downward.

But recently, the market has forgotten about UniPixel’s problems and its zero revenue in each quarter of 2014 and its missed earnings. Indeed, investors sent the stock rocketing to about $6 on hopes the company may be able this quarter to begin commercial production of a hard-coat resin and a sensor product.

TheStreetSweeper has not yet received a response to requests to UniPixil for an interview.

Check out other viewpoints here and we’ll lay out the top reasons we think it’s time to drop the pennies and run like crazy.



Heron Therapeutics: Rise of the Phoenix, or Fall of the Dodo Bird?

Heron Therapeutics (HRTX), a tiny drug company with no approved product and nothing but losses to report, may be just about ready to drop eye-popping news on investors.

“At some point in time, we’ll probably do a small equity raise to top off the tank,” CEO Barry Quart told TheStreetSweeper.

How small?

“I would not anticipate the raise being any substantially different than the raises we have done in the last year or two,” he said in a phone interview out of his San Diego office.  

“Those were … around $60 million or so,” he said, adding the raise might wait until data for a post-operation pain program is released this summer.

Asked why he has been selling Heron stock - $130,000 worth in the past few weeks - he said that has nothing to do with his perception of the company’s future.

Though his compensation exceeds $8 million, the chief executive said he simply needed to pay for two upcoming weddings.

Those stock sales, along with sales by another officer, have occurred amid a stock price pop of some 40 percent since January. Eager, biotech-fevered investors have been looking for study results for Heron’s top candidate, Sustol, plus eventual FDA approval to begin marketing, along with more news of its post-operative pain gel.

But Mr. Quart said investors may simply be just starting to pay attention to the company.

“Heron is the rebranding of a company that had a long and checkered past … A.P. Pharma,” he said. “I think the story had grown old and there wasn’t a lot of interest in our lead product - not a lot of significant, broad interest - in our lead product, which is for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.”

Will the company continue its Phoenix-like rise? Or will Heron become tomorrow’s biotech dodo bird?

While investors may find various viewpoints here, we’ll lay out some key concerns surrounding this company that remains unprofitable  – after 32 years of trying.

*Heron’s Food and Drug Administration applications fail, projected launches fail, but dilutive stock offerings are common.

*Not only is the CEO selling stock, so is a senior vice president.  The two both sold shares in March, significantly … before release of study results and before resubmission of its new drug application to the FDA.

*Risk to potential sales includes heavy competition, small market and unfortunate timing as the leading drug goes generic.

*The $420 million market cap reflects full success. Should Heron actually succeed at virtually any level, we believe there’s little upside remaining.

Here are the details:

*History of multiple FDA applications, projected “launches.” All failed.

Redwood City, Calif.-based Heron has been trying for years to get the US Food and Drug Administration to approve Sustol (APF530) under a new drug application or NDA that would allow the drug to be sold. It has tried since May 2009.

Heron’s application for its nausea and vomiting drug got its first denial letter or “complete response letter” in March 2010, sending the stock down 54 percent.

The FDA’s “CLR” to Heron (then A.P. Pharma) pointed to major concerns in multiple areas, including the two-syringe system, manufacturing deficiencies found during inspections, and a need for reanalysis of efficacy data.

In March 2013, the agency once again rejected the APF530 (Sustol) application, citing many of the same issues the company had been told to address in 2010.

Heron has spent the past two years trying to address the concerns contained in the last FDA rejection letter.

And no one really knows whether Sustol will get yet another FDA rejection.

If it does, we can expect at least the level of investor backlash that the stock endured previously. On March 28, 2013, the stock collapsed to 52 cents, a 12 percent drop in premarket trading when the company disclosed the Sustol application denial. The chart shows the decline, adjusted for the stock split.


EBIX: Caught with Its Hand in the Cookie Jar

Editor’s Note: To simplify matters, TheStreetSweeper has provided links to many of the documents that it used to prepare this investigative report – along with the detailed instructions necessary to replicate its calculations and verify its claims – in a lengthy series of endnotes that appear at the bottom of this story.

Ebix (Nasdaq: EBIX) better learn how to control its appetite. The last time that the hungry rollup company raided the cookie jar, the firm may have finally pushed its luck a little bit too far.

After relying on a blatant accounting trick to artificially sweeten its fourth-quarter earnings – and then concealing the hefty gain that allowed it to beat profit estimates that it would have otherwise missed – Ebix left behind some rather incriminating evidence. In the formal 10-K report that it filed a few days after it pulled that brazen stunt, the company provided enough fresh clues to reveal (among other juicy secrets reserved for later stories) the following:

·      Ebix added millions of dollars to its net income last year by impatiently reversing most of its reserves for potential “earn-out” payments to the very acquisition target responsible for the celebrated European contract that the company just won.

·      Following its acquisition of two companies in the first half of 2014, Ebix swiftly reversed all of the potential earn-out bonus for the first and most of that for the second by the end of that same year. Ebix recognized at least a portion of the resulting decline in its earn-out liabilities as net income and may have aggressively booked far more generous gains before its recent acquisition targets ever got a legitimate chance to actually prove themselves.

·      After reversing most of the reserves that it established for earn-out payments to many of the firms that it has purchased in recent years – without formally impairing any of the goodwill assigned to those companies – Ebix must have finally resigned itself to the inevitable. Since its goodwill balance increased by a smaller amount than the goodwill assigned to the firms that it purchased during the fourth quarter, Ebix clearly recognized some kind of write-down but apparently decided to bury that disturbing evidence.

Ebix ignored a request by TheStreetSweeper to quantify the reserves that it originally established for each one of the firms that it acquired over the past several years, along with any adjustments that it made to those contingent liabilities and any gains that it recorded as a result, in spite of the profound difference that earn-out reversals have repeatedly made in its financial results.


TubeMogul: It's All About The Numbers (And They Aren't Pretty)

New industry data on TubeMogul (TUBE) provides a brutal reality check for the digital video advertising company that has recently become a Wall Street darling.

This infatuation has given TubeMogul an optimistic $400 million market valuation. But that valuation is not supported by key industry factors defined by big-data analysis firm comScore.

The data on unique video views and ad videos viewed show that TubeMogul’s performance is falling behind the rest of the industry.

TubeMogul’s ad view traffic began its downhill slide in December, falling 9 percent. January ad views year-over-year dropped almost 21 percent in January and more than 16 percent in February.

In contrast, BrightRoll, a Yahoo division, enjoyed 116 percent growth YOY in December, 44 percent in January and 39 percent in February.

The trend for TubeMogul, then, has clearly been just the opposite of the industry in December, January and February.

See various viewpoints here, and the chart below. Our chart shows key comScore data. The data mashes month-by-month figures for Google, BrightRoll, AOL, LiveRail (Facebook acquisition), SpotXchange, Specific Media, Hulu, Tremor Video, Videology Inc. and TubeMogul going back as far as June 2009.


MicroVision: Why We Don’t See The Vision

MicroVision’s (MVIS) product and future still look stunningly microscopic, despite the big frenzy over an order for its tiny projector components.

MicroVision emerged about the time gasoline was $1 and the auto-film rewind Sure Shot cameras were the big thing.

When MicroVision went public three years later in 1996, investors plunked down about $42 a share on the belief that the company would someday sell technology to project images onto a user’s eyeball.

Decades later, the eyeball idea has morphed into component modules for tiny projectors. And the share price morphed to ~$2.

It stayed in that range from the summer of 2013 until recently. Then the stock suddenly streaked to ~$4. Why?

MicroVision has landed a $14.5 million component order essentially confirmed to be from Sony.

But TheStreetSweeper contends a $14.5 million order is still not going to morph MicroVision’s $469 million loss into a profit.

Let’s look at the issues we believe are conspiring to pummel this stock back to that familiar $2 territory and below.

*First, the bull case.

The bull thesis applauds further development efforts with Sony that began in April 2013. The technology is validated through the March non-exclusive licensing agreement.

MicroVision began fulfilling $3.8 million in component orders for Sony near year’s end and will continue into 2015.

Bulls are lauding PicoP integration into some consumer products such as the Korean OEM Celluon, which is now selling products. Sometime in the second half of the year, they are expecting a smartphone product.

More revenue sources are needed as indicated by 4Q14 revenue/losses of $0.7 million and $0.08 loss/share, however. Wall Street expected $1.7 million and $0.08 loss.

Oppenheimer is estimating $20 million revenue in 2015 ($-0.04 loss). It estimates revenue dropping to $12 million in 2016 ($-0.20 loss).

Extrapolating from Oppenheimer’s estimates, it appears MicroVision might sell $9.5 million to Sony this year, but only $8.5 million in 2016 – which doesn’t sound like a growing market.

While Northland Securities has a “buy” on MicroVision (the report was unavailable), Oppenheimer said it prefers to remain sidelined until more revenue sources are secured.

Investors may find other viewpoints on MicroVision here.

*The entire projector market is tiny. The average sales price is declining.


CorMedix: Finishing Out Of The Money

CorMedix (CRMD) insiders are prancing in the post parade as they prepare to enter the race of a lifetime.

The apparent objective: Sell millions of shares of the New Jersey pharmaceutical company before word spreads about CorMedix’s wacky financial underpinnings, its primary product that a doctor termed of little more benefit than a good hand-washing, and auditors’ recently stated “substantial doubt” about its ability to continue operating.

Always out of the money, CorMedix is:

  1. Registering 2.45 million shares of stock for insiders who want to sell, diluting average stockholders’ shares.
  2. Ridden by an insider who has jockeyed at least six disastrous companies, including some devastated by unexpected negative U.S. trial results.
  3. Racing the same old tired horse – a U.S.-unapproved catheter lock system called Neutrolin, designed to cut dialysis patients’ infections. Competitors' clinical trials are already underway, some completed.
  4. Trading up on the misconceived notion that the company could be bought out.

“All of a sudden CorMedix became this day trader chew toy that they’re buying and moving around,” said a doctor who also manages a fund. “But it’s just the same … company it was four months ago.”

The company did not respond to our requests for comment. But investors may check out other viewpoints on CorMedix here.

Bull arguments are: Neutrolin’s potential in dialysis and non-dialysis markets is undervalued. Belief that a partnership could soon develop to aid CorMedix as it approaches Phase III trials to determine efficacy and safety. A recent distribution deal in the Middle East, where Saudi Arabia reports roughly 13,000 dialysis patients with catheters. Also, another estimated 1.6 million intensive care unit patients with catheters.

Now, pull on your racing silks and ride along as we chase down a company that is racing at breakneck speed toward the glue factory. This treacherous racetrack is piled high with the following red flags:

*Insiders Do A Little Horse-Trading. Guess Who’ll Lose - By More Than A Nose?

CorMedix stock has galloped to a record-setting $8 and change in the past few days and weeks. Riding on misconceived rumors that it could be bought out, it’s continued to speed along at a decent clip, able to leap over earnings of a lost $0.09 per share, rather than the $0.12 analysts expected.

This blatant warning of March 12 must have breezed past people’s eyes:

“Our total cash on hand as of December 31, 2014 was approximately $4,340,000, compared to approximately $2,374,000 at December 31, 2013. Because our business to date does not generate positive operating cash flow, we will need to raise additional capital before we exhaust our current cash resources in order to continue to fund our research and development, as well as to fund operations generally.

Sure enough, the next day, CorMedix bent to the wishes of money-hungry insiders.

Noting, “We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of shares registered under this prospectus,” CorMedix held the earnings call and filed a registration statement clearing shareholders to sell $19 million worth of stock.

So, 75 stockholders can soon sell 2.45 million dilutive shares on the public market.

A stunning 47 have thrown up their hands and said “We’re outta here while the getting out is good.” They intend to sell every single share.

Selling shares were converted from warrants or notes related to loans given CorMedix. The company would receive about $13.5 million if all warrants are exercised.

Most of these sellers paid about $3.44 to convert those into common shares that they can now do some horse trading with – if they can find buyers.

So who can current shareholders thank for watering down their shares?

Well, check out the entire list here, beginning on page 24. It includes:

  1. Biggest seller, 12-percent loan maker Galenica, casting off over 165,000 shares. Stake reduced to 1.4 percent from 2.1.
  2. Former company director Gary Gelbfish and his entities buck off ~96,000 shares, pushing ownership from 6.6 percent down to 6.5.
  3. Current director and 4.1 percent owner Steven Lefkowitz left over 992,000 shares remaining, after offering over 19,000 shares.
  4. Current director Matthew Duffy holds percentage steady but offers nearly 5,000 shares for sale.

*One CorMedix selling shareholder has jockeyed a string of decimated companies – one promotes whipworm-egg cocktails.

One of CorMedix’ most notable selling shareholders grabbed a starring role in a recent article by TheStreetSweeper.

Dr. Lindsay Rosenwald, who directly and indirectly loaned ~$604,000 to CorMedix in 2009 apparently is running with the herd, too. Altogether he’s selling more than 138,000 shares.

TheStreetSweeper first warned shareholders in July 2013 about one of biotech’s best known horse traders, Dr. Rosenwald. We told about the curly-haired Dr. Rosenwald’s interesting alliances and his bizarre whipworm egg therapeutic company, Coronado Biosciences (CNDO then ~$8, now ~$3).

Dr. Rosenwald co-founded and financed Interneuron, maker of an anti-obesity drug. The drug was related to the “fen” in the “fen-phen” drug cocktail eventually beset by safety concerns that led to more than 3,000 lawsuits and withdrawal from the U.S. market in 1997.

Other biotech companies he founded or heavily supported have also dumped investors head-first.

These include:

Avax Technologies: deregistered in March 2009, now worth under a penny.

Biocryst: once traded at $34, now $10.

Genta: poster child for toxic financial deals, U.S. Food and Drug Administration rejections and horrible clinical trials. FDA ultimately ruled against Genta’s cancer drugs and the company lost a crucial $480 million deal with Aventis. Genta filed for chapter 7 bankruptcy.

Neose Technologies: filed a certificate of dissolution in March 2009. Under management’s final plan, liquidating distribution approved at $0.0121.

Ventrus Biosciences: founded and supported by Rosenwald, traded over $21 in 2011, now trading for ~$1.

Today, perhaps losing interest in CorMedix, Dr. Rosenwald and entities intend to cut back their stake to ~2.8 percent from ~3 percent as selling shareholders.


Hydrogenics: Margin Drop, Cash-Poor, Insider Sell-Out And Enough Malfunctions to Make Janet Jackson Swoon

Hydrogenics Corp. (HYGS) suffers an unfortunate link to Janet Jackson - sort of a “wardrobe malfunction.”

The fuel cell company is now dealing with a “parts malfunction” in which it revealed two multi-million-dollar shipments were delayed because Hydrogenics’ supplier had built defective equipment. This mistake by the fuel cell technology company electrified listeners almost as much as the singer’s caper.

Oddly, much as that other malfunction ignited fleeting promotion for a fading star, Hydrogenics’ malfunction may have sparked an unexpected boost for the company, too. We’ll explain that below.

We’ll also look more closely at various big issues threatening Hydrogenics’ business:

*The reputation-damaging parts malfunction.

*Big shareholder sells off stock.

*Gross margin drops heavily.

*Backlog drops – indicating shrinkage of future potential sales - even as some analysts expect 50 percent year-over-year growth.

*Hydrogenics execs back off from 30 percent growth projection – a figure also unlikely to materialize given backlog numbers.

*Burning cash. Company’s shelf prospectus allows up to $100 million worth of banknotes, common stock, etc. We expect an equity raise.

Hydrogenics did not return our requests for an interview for this article.

With a tip of the hat to some old Janet Jackson tunes, we’ll review Hydrogenics’ positives, as well as the negatives that we believe make this stock scarier than any future outrageous attempts by Ms. Jackson to remain relevant.

*”Whoops Now,” Here’s The Bull Case

Canada-based Hydrogenics provides hydrogen fuel cells for stationary and mobile uses, and hydrogen-generating products for industrial applications as well as for energy storage.

The bull argument includes a belief Hydrogenics can sell more products as California, Canada, European Union and Germany develop policies to encourage alternative energy uses.

Additionally, backlogged inventory still appears significant, and bulls add this suggests the pipeline will lead to a positive adjusted EBITDA for 2015.

The maturing and expanding order pipeline should drive more news flow, which analysts believe would be a strong positive catalyst, pointing to growth and stability assuming hydrogen fuel cells become a more common power source.

* “Can’t B Good,” Or Why Did Hydrogenics Have To Blow This Delivery?

The stock has zig-zagged over the past year like a pop musician drunk on fuel cell bubbly.  The stock swooned again in December when the company updated investors with the news that delayed shipments would squash 2014 targets.

Then came the day for Hydrogenics to sing out those sour notes in the earnings call. In light of the delays, EBITDA remained negative and the targeted $50 million revenue turned out to be just $45.5 million.

“Let me assure our investors that it was very unusual for these particular parts in question to be defective,” CEO Daryl Wilson said early in the call on March 4.

Those parts were critical. One shipment was destined as a second energy storage system for E.ON, an important German energy and gas customer.

Mr. Wilson said the supplier had simply provided inferior parts for this “OnSite Generation” project and another project that he didn’t name.

E.ON’s Falkenhagen project currently uses Hydrogenics’ 2 megawatt electrolyzer. The system allows the combination of water with excess energy from wind turbines to create hydrogen that is stored and moved into the natural gas pipeline.

A big portion of a $5 million sale and Hydrogenics’ reputation hinged on delivering a second electrolyzer to E.ON. This was to be installed in the Hamburg project that E.ON folks enthusiastically referred to as “the first prototype operating in the 1MW range.”

But Hydrogenics executives indicated the company will recover from this blunder and get paid this first quarter.

We hope so. But we can’t overemphasize the significance of messing up these OnSite Generation orders.

Consider this customer concentration issue: E.ON and the other unnamed important customer are among just four big customers that delivered 39 percent of Hydrogenics’ sales last year.  

*”You Want This,” or Darn Right We Want Good Gross Margins. Ahhh, Those Twisty Low Margins

The parts problems went hand-in-hand with another blow-up mentioned gently by analysts in the earnings call. Gross margins fell both sequentially and the same quarter prior year. In fact, margins are by far the lowest since the first quarter of 2013, as shown below.


Ebix: The Truth Hurts

Let’s give Ebix (Nasdaq: EBIX) a chance to prove that it has nothing to hide – no accounting fraud, no money laundering, no intentional tax evasion – by challenging the company to a good, old-fashioned game of “Truth or Dare.”

We’ll go ahead and present Ebix with its two options right now. When the company hosts its quarterly conference call tomorrow morning, it can choose to answer the questions raised in this report – and provide the necessary documentation to verify its claims – or it can dare to remain silent and encourage us to stick with our own jarring conclusions instead.

Let’s get started. Since Ebix has grown so accustomed to fielding softball questions from the only analyst who recommends (over even follows) its stock, the company might need a little bit of extra time to prepare.


Resonant Hypes Phantom Customer. Seriously?

This stock’s been jumping around like a youngster hyped up on sugar and now we’re sending Resonant Inc., (RESN) to the time-out chair.

And thanks to its latest press release flaunting a mystery customer, the Santa Barbara, Calif. filter company doesn’t get to go outside for a long, long time.

Investors punished the company late last month for increased losses – and more importantly for its deficient product not meeting the standards of its Skyworks customer – sending shares to $15.33 then tumbling back down to $9.54 the next day.

Corporal punishment ensued in the form of six law firms investigating possible securities violations and possible breaches of fiduciary duty regarding the deficient filter design geared to help cut unwanted frequencies in mobile devices.

Ultimately, the only thing odder than the press release Resonant launched 10 minutes after the market closed Monday, March 9 was the reaction to it. Amid rumors that bull pieces or a leaked press release instigated buying, shares began rocketing, approached $12.99 around 11:30 a.m. and jumped more after hours to $14.40.

Resonant’s press release simply stated it “has engaged” with an unnamed second customer for an unnamed product.  

“The customer has not committed to use the resulting design and terms for a license have not been finalized,” Resonant stated in the release.

Meanwhile, Resonant’s phantom customer became a topic at the ongoing Roth Conference in Laguna Niguel, Calif. where the company is scheduled to present today, March 10.

“The way you look at these no-commitment type deals is that’s exactly what it means. No commitment. No risk,” an analyst attending the conference said Monday.

“If Resonant came up to me and said, ‘Hey, I’m going to do a design for you for free.’ I’m like, ‘Sure, man, why the heck not? If you want to give away stuff for free, I’m taking it,’” he added. “So I don’t understand why the market got all excited about it.”

*Skyworks: Substandard Resonant Product


Anthera Pharmaceuticals: Another Cash-Poor, Bubbly Biotech About To Blow Apart

Anthera Pharmaceuticals (ANTH) investors may have forgotten its 2013 drug study scandal that set the scientific community spinning, as well as the Nasdaq delisting that it barely dodged again last month.

Caught in the shimmering biotech bubble, Anthera continues to get rewarded by the market as surely as the California biotech continues to destroy shareholder value. But, hey, at least detective work can uncover those deeds in its SEC filings and elsewhere. That’s what we’re here for.

Here, investors may find other viewpoints on this company working to develop and sell products for serious diseases associated with inflammation and autoimmune diseases.

So let’s look more closely into some issues this company faces:

(1) Caught up in the biotech bubble, which experts say may be on the verge of bursting.

(2) Burning millions and burn rate is expected to accelerate under further attempts to meet FDA approval; expect a potentially dilutive equity raise.

(3) Material weakness issues.

(4) One analyst downgrades stock, another analyst calls stock a sell/high risk.

(5)Unusual executive enrichment despite debilitating $309 million deficit.

*Stock Price Wrapped in Glistening Biotech Bubble Ready to Burst

According to a March 6 Bloomberg article “These Investors Think There’s a Biotech Bubble That’s About to Burst,” containing telling charts, the 269 biotech companies were primarily responsible for the Nasdaq’s gain over the last four years.

But “the end is coming,” according to one quoted expert.

Bloomberg continued: “Now there are signs that the biotech industry’s fortunes could change. One key measure of investor pessimism, the short interest ratio, has about doubled for the Nasdaq Biotechnology Index since 2013, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.”

Irrational exuberance infects the biotech arena. It’s really approaching the level TheStreetSweeper warned investors about in our article in August 2013, “The ExOne Company: Irrational Exuberance Obscures Black Clouds Building Around 3-D Printing.”

At one time, 3-D printing somehow worked its way into conversations at parties, at the local bar and grill, and around the dinner table. People couldn’t stop talking about it. Couldn’t resist investing in it. Though it was old technology, virtually everyone seemed convinced that 3-D was the next big thing. The talk just stopped.

ExOne (XONE) investors got hit heavily when the bubble burst and at TheStreetSweeper publication date the stock was $69, now $14

And take a look at the ExOne and 3-D Systems (DDD) stock chart – and what happened during that miserable burst bubble.


Eyes Wide Open: Second Sight Medical Products Becomes Another MDB Capital Special

Second Sight Medical Products (EYES) creates a bionic eye for blind people.

It seems a cool business opportunity, at first glance, to implant electrodes in the eye to ultimately create images that the blind see as shapes or patterns.

The market, indeed, considers Second Sight worth $559 million. This stunning valuation exists despite the fact that the Sylmar, Calif. company made only $1.5 million in sales in all of 2013 – and it costs Second Sight close to $3 for every $1 the company makes.  

So we took a critical look at Second Sight, the market and business plan. And we got quite an eye-full.

Here are some top reasons we believe Second Sight is fantastically overvalued and headed for a crushing reality check:

*Big investment firms yawn. So debt-riddled company grabs MDB by arm, hits Wall Street.

*Patient acceptance issues and FDA adverse event reports arise over Second Sight’s retinal prosthesis.

*Market tiny. Scale problems enormous. Next target minimum four years out.

*Stock lockup expiring; CEO gets break on stock bought with Second Sight cash.

*Look out ahead: Unless Second Sight plans nothing, more cash needed.

Second Sight’s key retinal prosthesis has three parts: an electronic device implanted and around the eye, a tiny video camera attached to eyeglasses, and a video processing unit the patient carries or wears.

While investors may find other viewpoints here, let’s look at the eye-popping details surrounding this company now trading at well over 100 times sales.


Sportsman's Warehouse: Too Many Bullets to Dodge?

Sportsman’s Warehouse (Nasdaq: SPWH) looks an awful lot like a sitting duck right now. Since its largest pure-play competitor has already shot off its mouth about the “wickedly competitive” nature of the recent holiday season ahead of the company’s fourth-quarter report, SPWH must feel like it’s treading water with the equivalent of a neon target on its back.

Unless SPWH somehow managed to dodge a relentless slew of bullets over the holidays, in fact, the company has probably spent the past couple of months in serious pain. We should know for sure in a matter of weeks.

With rival Cabella’s (NYSE: CABslashing its prices in order to steal business away from the competition during the crucial holiday season, however, SPWH sure looks vulnerable to a devastating miss. Just listen to some of the noisy warning shots fired by CAB earlier this month, and imagine the fallout that SPWH likely suffered as a direct result.

“We felt like when we talked to you guys in October that it was going to be a promotional environment, and we felt pretty good about our November and December promotional cadence. (But) as we started getting into November, it became very clear that it sure felt like there was a lot less consumer disposable income. And retailers, mostly outside of our space, really started cranking up offers -- to the point that some were almost ridiculous – weeks ahead of Black Friday. We just felt like, to protect our franchise and to maybe be opportunistic and take share, we had to jump into the fight. And what that meant was it took more discounts, as the consumer was very promotionally minded in the quarter.”

“It was definitely a war for the customer’s dollar in November and December, (and) I don’t think we were unique in feeling the unbelievable pressures … It was a wickedly competitive environment. (So) we used our leadership position to get in the fight – which a lot of our competitors can’t. And that was kind of the story of the quarter.”

“While we didn’t feel great about the earnings impact, we definitely took it to people from a share standpoint … During the quarter, we were able to grow market share in almost all of our major merchandise categories. We are pleased with our ability to grow share during the quarter and further pleased we have seen this trend continue into the first quarter of 2015.”

“It’s a whole new world, with affiliate networks and mobile apps and comparison shopping engines and all of that stuff. And I don’t think the promotional environment in the fourth quarter of THIS year – unless the economy improves greatly – will be much less intense.”


Ballard Power Struggling In "Extremely Silly" Niche

Fuel cell maker Ballard Power Systems (BLDP) has let its best technology slip away and insists on weaving down a long, bumpy road to nowhere on three flat tires.  

Shares popped after Ballard announced Volkswagen would pay $50 million for the proton exchange membrane fuel cell patents that Ballard bought last April.

“That’s where the magic really happens,” a longtime clean-tech analyst told TheStreetSweeper. “And that’s what Volkswagen bought.”

But the fuel cell manufacturer would have been wiser to ink a deal to sell its customer, VW, all the fuel cells it wants. However, blinded by the cash infusion, the market excitedly ran up the stock by $1, though the deal was really worth only 38 cents per share ($50m/132m shares).

Ballard’s agreement does include a $30 million VW service contract extension to 2018. Unfortunately, though, that money will get coughed out over the years.

Besides tossing away its prime technology, other issues facing Canada-based Ballard include:

*No significant opportunity remaining.

*Expert calls fuel cell cars “extremely dumb.” Volkswagen adds, “decades away.”

*Google and Apple cars: Electric, not fuel cell, for a simple reason.

 *China prospects fold.

Though investors may read different viewpoints here, we’ll hit other issues threatening Ballard stock with a Hindenburg-esque explosion.

*No significant opportunity left.

Some investors may be clinging to the hope that Ballard could strike a deal similar to the VW arrangement with other car companies.

We disagree.

That’s because DaimlerChrysler, Toyota, Honda, Nissan, GM, Ford, Hyundai, and BMW already have their own fuel cell plant in-house.

So Ballard traded its technology – which it bought last year from United Technologies Corp. - for cash. But the arrangement has left Ballard with little more than the ability to sell fuel cells for buses.

Ballard did recently hype a possible deal for supplying fuel cell technology for 10 buses – but this is more of a very slow, low-rev process that’s been going on for a long time with little financial impact.

*Experts, even Volkswagen, say fuel cell is decades away.


iBio: Capitalizing on Ebola Misunderstanding

*iBio shares are flying on misunderstood news. Shares jumped ~46% this morning, from $0.90 at previous day's close to about $1.32. The market has misinterpreted Sunday’s “60 Minutes” program spotlighting Ebola.

*iBio is not even mentioned. And there’s no reason iBio should have been mentioned. The program focused on the experimental, tobacco-based drug ZMapp.

*iBio had seemingly aligned itself with ZMapp previously. iBio wrongly asserted that its patents and technology would be licensed by ZMapp makers, claim recent class action lawsuits.


Miller Energy: Alaska Debates Cutting Vital Tax Credit Handouts

THESTREETSWEEPER QUICK HIT – Terrible, cash-eating news from Alaska threatens to drive another stake into Miller Energy Resources (MILL).  The bleeding Knoxville, Tenn. company is already struggling beneath a recent executive chairman’s margin call that led to panic selling, enormous debt, big earnings/revenue misses and low oil prices.  

The last thing the company needs is a hit to its tax credit receipts.

That’s because tax credits tied to Miller’s exploration in Alaska have meant millions to the oil and gas company each year. Miller anticipates receiving about $72 million in Alaska tax credit receipts in 2015.

Alaska issues tax credits to oil producers to encourage exploration in the state. The company applies for these credits each quarter and frequently notes that operations depend heavily on tax credit money.

Every spare dime is coveted, as new CEO Carl Giesler told analysts in December: “From both the financial and operational perspective the quarter was disappointing to put it mildly.”

But now it’s obvious that Alaska Gov. Bill Walker is having second thoughts about the very tax credits that keep Miller pumping.


On Deck Capital: Loan-Shark Rates, Bad Loans, Bad Business Plan


On Deck Capital (ONDK) seems to be swimming within those murky waters populated by loan sharks. Indeed, the online company makes loans to desperate small businesses with bad credit and charges them astronomic interest rates.

On Deck doesn’t tout the actual annual percentage rate charged. Yet fishing deep into federal filings yields actual APRs far above the company’s advertised rate of 18 percent to 36 percent.

In fact, filings show the company charges these desperate borrowers an annual rate as high as 99 percent.

On Deck gets away with this because interest rate laws affecting commercial loans vary from state to state. California, for example, sets the rates at 10 percent or 5 percent above the Federal Reserve Bank rate. The permissible limit is 9 percent in Illinois. In fact, a new report out today says payday lenders definitely face stricter regulations, so On Deck and peers may no longer get to fly under the radar.

Successfully positioning itself as a technology play for its initial public offering on Dec. 17, On Deck’s stock spiked to nearly $29.

So the market has slapped over $1 billion in value on a company with $354,000 net income in its pocket.

All that for a business model eerily similar to those that handed us the subprime lending crisis.


Novatel Wireless: Fundamentally Flawed Business Plan, Lockup Release Lather Up This Soap Opera

Novatel Wireless (MIFI) rose from a virtual bodice-ripping B-grade soap opera star into a proper Wall Street darling in three months, with shares bursting to ~$5.50 for more than a 78 percent gain.

But while Novatel has recently shed some drama (read the steamy shareholder letter here), the company remains fundamentally flawed.

The wireless solutions technology provider primarily sells pocket-sized wireless modems to allow Internet access anywhere and also machine-to-machine modules.

But we don’t believe this San Diego, Calif.-based company is likely to return the love investors have thrown at it recently.

For other viewpoints on Novatel, click on this link. Read on to find out why we consider Novatel risky both now and later.

*Why Novatel’s biggest revenue-generator is unlikely to reach expectations.

Novatel is focusing on the MiFi system - a Wifi hot spot provided through a wallet-sized box that consumers on the go can use to access the Internet with their mobile gadgets.

“They’ve been doing that for a long time. It’s a brutal business. It’s always been brutal,” said a tech analyst who requested anonymity. “The margins are terrible.”

In fact, the product produces less than 11 cents to a little over 20 cents for each dollar sold. The margins improved last quarter – special thanks go to a $2.9 million inventory write-down and selling $2 million in old inventory at near cost.

Novatel must hate having a bunch of its obsolete China-and-Thailand-made inventory sitting around. Yet it says “increased competitive pressures” may force more of these write-downs.

With historically bad margins and declining revenue grabbing Novatel by the throat, some leaders wanted to sell the MiFi division, according to sources.

But, of course, the spinoff didn't happen.

*No buyers for MiFi is spooky enough. But there’s more.

Then, with no other company apparently wanting MiFi, miserable share prices and a poorly settled class action lawsuit, activist shareholders lobbed a rip-roaring fiery letter alleging Novatel had been mismanaged. The company booted executives and directors and installed new ones, and even replaced its old “NVTL” stock symbol with “MIFI.”

Emerging from this soap opera, activist shareholder/interim CEO Alex Mashinsky became the permanent CEO. Fellow activist shareholder Richard Karp joined him on the board of directors.

The leadership that emerged from the summer of 2014 bloodbath is now trying to pick up the sagging MiFi business responsible for nearly 79 percent of Novatel’s sales.

But the results have been disappointing.

Last quarter, revenue from MiFi dropped a blistering 59 percent. Yes, compared with a year ago, MiFi revenue is a whopping $49 million lower. Net losses rose an unspeakable 58 percent to $8.8 million.


Jamba Juice: Potent Hype, Bitter Aftertaste

Maybe Jamba Juice (Nasdaq: JMBA) investors should have gulped down a bunch of carrot-infused smoothies before they ever started drinking the company’s Kool-Aid. With a little sharper vision, they might have seen right through some of the more obvious hype surrounding the company’s new “asset-light” strategy and noticed at least a few of the overlooked realities that make its celebrated plan seem like such an unhealthy idea.

Wait until they discover the bitter ingredients that Jamba has decided to include in its half-baked recipe for success. Before they reward Jamba with any more applause for the steps that it has taken to transform the company into a leaner – and ultimately more profitable – smoothie chain, they better make sure that they can stomach the danger posed by the bitter surprises listed below:

·      For starters, Jamba has effectively diluted the cost reductions that it has rushed to celebrate by quietly recording a mountain of buried expenses that makes its reported savings look wildly overblown.

·      Jamba has also chosen to later revise those overlooked expenses for no obvious reason, taking liberties that make the company look as if it has literally engaged in cooking its books.

·      In yet another move that seems to make little sense (unless the company simply hopes to prop up its share price), Jamba has decided to sell more than 100 of its top-performing stores and then use the proceeds to purchase its own stock – at a much steeper multiple of earnings – instead.

·      By “refranchising” those valuable stores, Jamba actually stands to raise far less money than wishful bulls like to think, while sacrificing most of the generous revenue and EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) currently generated by those busy locations.

·      Even with the possible (if not likely) benefit of one-time gains from asset sales, Jamba expects its future EBITDA to fall 30% below outdated Wall Street estimates that analysts continue to maintain in spite of the much lower forecast presented by the company itself.

·      In a failed effort to boost customer traffic that has already led to a horrific quarterly miss – and threatens to remain a lingering drag on its future results – Jamba has introduced lower-margin products (such as fresh juices) that have simply cannibalized smoothie sales and obliterated its profit margins instead.

·      Finally, Jamba has spent years relying on a CFO previously employed by a pair of companies that seemed almost cursed with bad luck -- one of them already bankrupt and the other severely wounded -- after they left her in charge of keeping track of their own books.


TubeMogul: Why This Stock Will Go Down The Tubes

Behind the scenes, TubeMogul (TUBE) is in a world of hurt. Digital media giant Google has practically run away with one of Tube’s biggest customers.

But this bad break – and its unfortunate future implications – has flown under the radar until now. It’s the first of three negatives threatening to clobber Tube’s share price.

Flash back to last June. Folks in the Emeryville, Calif. headquarters buzzed with anticipation that TubeMogul had seemingly knocked down a king-maker partnership with Mondelez International.

TubeMogul provides self-serve software that allows advertisers to plan, buy and measure the effectiveness of video ads. Its recent customer Mondelez manufactures Oreo, Wheat Thins and various chocolates, gum and candy.

“Mondelez International's digital branding strategy has always been ahead of the curve,” Brett Wilson, TubeMogul's CEO and co-founder said. “The way they harness the power of software to amplify their strategy is groundbreaking and we're proud to enable that in video.”

The deal helped propel the money-losing Tube to its initial public offering last July.

Tube quickly settled into an overvalued spot on the Nasdaq. Though the IPO price got cut to $7 from the originally proposed $11-$13, Tube shares blasted off, quickly gaining 240 percent. Shares settled recently around $16, handing the company a valuation approaching half-a-billion dollars.

But just four months after the TubeMogul announcement, Google and Mondelez held what’s described as contentious behind-the-scenes negotiations.

 “Google wanted Mondelez to use DoubleClick Bid Manager, Google’s demand-side buying platform, instead of competitor TubeMogul, to execute the YouTube transactions as part of the deal, and it was using YouTube’s TrueView pricing system as leverage, according to multiple executives directly involved in the negotiations,” Digiday, a website for tech geeks, wrote of the Mondelez-Google negotiations.

Google had pushed Tube aside.


Tekmira Pharmaceuticals: Spinning Its Next “Big Story"

Tekmira Pharmaceuticals (TKMR) may not have found its next big biotech thing, after all.

After a crazy-good run riding the Ebola scare from obscurity to prominence in just a few months, the company found itself searching for something new to keep investors interested. Tekmira’s betting that hepatitis B will be it.

Shares of Canada-based Tekmira jumped from ~$15 to ~$24 earlier this month on news it teamed up with OnCore BioPharma to work to develop a hepatitis B therapy.

Now, on Tekmira’s recent tepid announcement of dosing one person in its tiny 20-patient clinical trial, shares jumped 2.7% - far short of the long-gone Ebola gains of 280%-plus.

Indeed, Tekmira reminds us of another Ebola treatment-next-big-biotech-thing wannabe that TheStreetSweeper warned investors about, iBio (then $1.88, now ~$0.52).

While other viewpoints about Tekmira are available here, let’s look at some issues surrounding Tekmira’s latest, greatest target.


Tekmira has become a heavy favorite among stock promotors. Between March 1, 2012 and Sept. 3, 2014, sites ranging from “Penny OTC Stocks” to “Wall Street Resources” issued reports on TKMR a total of 21 times.

On March 1, 2012, for example, with the stock drooping at $2.56 per share, five – yes, five – stock promotors sent out positive reports about TMKR to potential investors.

It worked. TKMR fetched as much as $2.91 by the end of the day – a striking 8 percent gain.

Two years later, on March 6, 2014, a total of 10 stock promoters reported on Tekmira. Yes, 10 separate promotions on the same day. Coincidence? We don’t think so.

With news reports on Ebola rampant and Tekmira promoters out in force, Tekmira shares rocketed from about $19 on March 4 to about $28 on March 6.


Ziopharm Oncology: 5 Potential Downsides To Its New Deal

Shares of Boston, Mass.-based Ziopharm Oncology (ZIOP) ripped some 54 percent within hours on a positive news story this week – a story full of holes and investor risks.

The stock raced from $5.74 up to $9.50 following the announcement that ZIOP and its partner Intrexon Corp. (XON) signed a licensing agreement with the Texas cancer center, MD Anderson.

Though the share price has fallen, the excitement handed a roughly $900 million valuation to a company with a $362 million deficit and no product.

The deal trades licensing rights for MD Anderson’s non-approved cancer technology for $100 million worth of shares from both ZIOP and XON. ZIOP has also committed to paying $15 million to $20 million yearly to the cancer center for research and development for three years, though the press release is fuzzy. ZIOP must pay the first $3.75 million within two months.

Ominous details surround ZIOP’s dollar-and-dilution deal, as well as ZIOP itself. Here are the top five reasons why TheStreetSweeper dislikes this deal and sees loads of downside ahead:

  1. ZIOP doesn’t have the money to pull off this deal. So we believe ZIOP will have to sell stock, posing imminent dilution.

ZIOP has just $46 million in cash. Its own quarterly report says that’s “sufficient to fund operations into the fourth quarter of 2015.”

But that was before the new agreement. ZIOP is burning over $7 million per quarter. And it is now committed to pay about half that much - $3.75 million to $4 million quarterly - to The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston for three years.

  1. Shares worth $15 million offered as incentive to speed contract signing.

The day ZIOP was scheduled to present to JP Morgan, Jan. 14, turns out to be the very day ZIOP pulled this licensing announcement out of its ear. JP Morgan acted as underwriter during ZIOP’s roughly $54 million public offering in October 2013 at $3.50 per share. But that timing may not have been mere coincidence.

The kicker: This “highly sensitive and confidential” letter to a University of Texas vice president of strategic industry ventures describes $15 million worth of incentive shares – 1.6 million ZIOP shares and 278,218 XON shares – not included in the licensing agreement, to hand to MD Anderson to speed up the expected 120-day contract approval process. That way, the chief executives of ZIOP and XON who signed the letter could issue the public announcement during the JP Morgan conference. The letter added:


Amira Nature Foods: Hungry for Another Big Helping of Cash

So what if Amira Nature Foods (NYSE: ANFIfound some way to sweeten its guidance? The company needed to score a few brownie points after its latest financial results proved so difficult to swallow. Now that its stock has rebounded to more appetizing levels, the company can try to better satisfy a powerful craving of its own.

With the rest of its cash earmarked for a big-ticket processing facility that will cost a whole lot more than it can presently afford, Amira desperately needs to raise a fresh mountain of dough pretty soon.

Before Amira returns to the capital market for the money to cure its hunger pains, however, the company better get ready to start eating its words. Amira might want to go ahead and hold its nose. We knocked the sugar coating off the bitter truth.

Remember the onerous $144 million debt load that Amira went public to reduce a couple of years ago? The company sure gave up on that idea in a hurry. After using most of the proceeds from its initial public offering to reduce its leverage, Amira soon dug itself into another deep hole and has since gone on to saddle itself with an even more staggering $184 million debt load instead.

Or how about the lower interest rate that Amira kept insisting, quarter after quarter, that it would soon manage to secure? Despite all of the cheap credit available to even seemingly hopeless companies, Amira never managed to negotiate a better deal of its own, for some disturbing reason. With the interest rate on its bank debt actually escalating in recent quarters – and the interest rate on its overdue payments to suppliers literally topping 20% -- Amira has found itself paying such a high effective interest rate that the company might as well use a credit card to finance its day-to-day operations.


Sportsman's Warehouse: Aiming Too High for Its Own Good?

Sportsman’s Warehouse (Nasdaq: SPWH) seems almost determined to shoot itself in the foot again.

Under the gun to hit ambitious growth targets that look increasingly difficult to achieve, SPWH has tried to overcome a persistent decline in same-store sales by rapidly building new stores on credit after following a similar plan straight into bankruptcy. This time, SPWH faces even stiffer competition in a market hurt by plunging sales of guns and ammunition – a business that accounts for roughly half of its revenue – too, as big-name players like Cabela’s (NYSE: CAB) and Bass Pro Shops race to open new locations of their own. Willing to settle for the leftover scraps that likely remain untouched for a reason, SPWH has decided to focus more heavily on smaller markets that rival chains might understandably choose to avoid.

After all, SPWH has started hunting for new business in some rather dinky towns.

SPWH intends to open five of the eight new stores that it has pledged to build during its next fiscal year in towns with a combined population of barely 70,000 residents.  In fact (as illustrated in the section that follows), three of those new locations will serve entire counties that look either too small or too poor to support one of the company’s big-box stores.

With a measly $1.7 million in its bank account and a staggering $219.3 million worth debt on its balance sheet, SPWH obviously cannot afford to start blowing a bunch of precious cash on new stores that make little business sense.


Freshpet: An Overvalued, Bad, Bad Dog

By Sonya Colberg, TheStreetSweeper Senior Investigative Reporter

Pet food company Freshpet (FRPT) jumped out with an IPO last month and shares fetched a surprising $20 the first trading day.

Freshpet loses money as it installs and maintains refrigerators in stores to display its natural, slightly cooked dog food.

The New Jersey company released numbers late Tuesday showing its $0.14 loss exceeded analysts’ $0.12 expectations on revenue of $22.5 million. Consequently the stock dropped, followed by a jump to about $19.

But we’ve pawed through Freshpet’s numbers and were astonished to determine how many dollars the company makes per fridge:

About $19.57 per day.

That’s less than a $27.49 tube of Freshpet Vital.

So a company that the market says is worth over $600 million sells the daily equivalent of one meat tube per fridge.

And, according to the conference call, Freshpet’s expecting that figure to reach only about $21 to $22 at the end of 2015.

So it appears this money-losing company is all but certain to continue losing money.

At the core of that issue, TheStreetSweeper has dug up three overriding challenges facing this 10-year-old Secaucus, N.J. company.

And we believe the overall challenges make this stock worth less than one-third its current price.


Radcom: Radically Misunderstood, Radically Overvalued, Part 2

By Sonya Colberg, Senior Investigative Reporter

In the first part of TheStreetSweeper’s two-part series on Israel-based company Radcom (RDCM), we described the software company’s negative trends and predictive chart.

Now, Part 2 highlights the top three additional supporting reasons we expect Radcom will follow that chart:

  1. Hype and the misunderstood analyst expectation beat.

Shares jumped 44 percent on the report Radcom revenue rose about a million bucks last quarter to $6 million, while earnings per share beat analysts’ expectations (10 cents actual EPS; 3 cents analyst estimate).

An analyst we spoke with speculated that the low estimate may have been due to either a lack of information about Radcom or a desire to prep Radcom for a possible upcoming stock offering.

Indeed, it seems the sole true analyst covering the company for H.C. Wainwright put a “buy” and a $7.50 price target on Radcom last July. But the analyst puts a “buy” rating on most stocks.

Here are examples here - a $50 price target on SILC, now ~$36 - and here - a $5 price target on FNJN, now ~$3.

And the charts below show other stock picks have gone bad, too:

Local Corp., LOCM, Analyst’s Target Price=$4


Radcom: Radically Misunderstood, Radically Overvalued, Part 1

Radcom Inc. (RDCM) has turned radical, with its long-ignored stock ripping to the double-digit levels reached in 2006 and earlier.  

The Tel Aviv, Israel company switched from its money-losing hardware business about nine months ago. Investors went mad when Radcom pulled its finances out of the red as it introduced software designed to address customer service problems for telecom companies.

In fact, investors inflicted with Rad fever have plunked down three times more for Radcom than other industry stocks.

But there’s trouble ahead.

Indeed, the company’s stock historically rises on hype, while it drops on insider sales and large private stock sales. Check out the chart below showing the rise and fall of Radcom’s stock price – a chart that predicts Radcom shares will likely collapse again in the near future.


Blue Nile: Breaking Hearts – And Share Value

Diamond seller, Blue Nile (NILE), is in the business of turning romance into cold, hard cash.

As if that isn’t tough enough, the Seattle, Wash. diamond and jewelry retailer is selling online. While the company’s courtship of customers is getting tougher, recent creative hype has blinded investors into buying into the dream and pushing the market cap to a stunning $400 million.

But this love story is doomed. Here are some highlights on why TheStreetSweeper believes the diamond company will quickly lose its sparkle once again:

*Diamonds are a girl’s best friend: Cheap won’t cut it.

NILE’s engagement business is at risk partially because a woman may feel a slight wave of disappointment when Prince Charming shows up with a diamond – and it’s from a Wal-Mart-esque online store.

NILE execs admitted during a summertime William Blair stock conference, in fact, that the biggest problem is getting men to buy engagement rings online because there’s “a trust component and then there’s a relationship component.”

CEO Harvey Kanter added, “I think that that -- the reason why growth rates haven't been sustainably high has been that we still have to get a lot of the market to understand that.”

*NILE’s recent “test:” Weakening business model.

Mr. Kanter said NILE is now “testing” a brick-and-mortar store in Rhode Island and in Seattle. This appears to be a test of the idea that customers may consider buying engagement diamonds online less satisfying and riskier than seeing and touching them in a store first.

Keep in mind that the reason NILE can sell jewelry cheaper is because, as an online company, it has been able to avoid the costs of physical buildings, utilities and sales people of traditional jewelry stores. And now it’s trying to compete in brick-and-mortar with thousands of established jewelry stores.


Receptos: A Bloated Highflier Dumped by Insiders Nervous about the Truth?

Receptos (Nasdaq: RCPT) looks even luckier than usual right now. The bleeding biotechnology firm has racked up such mind-blowing gains over the past few weeks, in fact, that even its own executives – who just dumped more than $35 million worth of the company’s highflying stock – must wonder how long its good fortune can actually last.

With its stock price recently exploding into the triple digits, making the company worth a staggering $2.9 billion years before it even hopes to seek approval of its very first drug, Receptos arguably looks priced beyond perfection at this point.

For starters, Receptos now owes more than a third of its lofty valuation to a Phase II study that barely even managed to achieve its primary goal. When Receptos issued a positive update about that ongoing trial a few weeks ago – sparking a wild celebration that expanded its market value by almost $1 billion in a single day – the firm actually provided enough underlying data to reveal that a tiny handful of patients happened to narrowly swing the results in its own favor.

Just pull out that announcement and grab your calculator. Once you complete a few simple equations, you’re bound to arrive at that striking conclusion yourself.

Start with the 199 patients that Receptos enrolled in its “Touchstone” trial, a Phase II study designed to test its leading drug candidate RPC1063 as a possible treatment for ulcerative colitis (UC), and then divide those subjects into three different groups: one for patients who received a “high” 1 milligram dose of the drug; one for patients who received a “low” 0.5 milligram dose of the same medication; and one for those who received an inactive placebo. Assume that Receptos made sure that its researchers distributed those subjects as evenly as possible, with 66.3 patients assigned to each arm of the trial. Now, you can estimate just how many patients actually recovered after taking the company’s experimental drug.

Of the patients treated with RPC1063 during the eight-week induction period of that clinical trial, only 16.4% of those who received the high dose and 13.8% of those who received the low dose – or the equivalent of 10.9 and 9.2 patients, respectively – achieved clinical remission to meet the primary endpoint of that ongoing study. Even so, the high-dose group somehow fared well enough to hit the primary endpoint of the study by achieving “statistically significant” positive results. In the second group, however, the recovery rate – lowered by just one or two patients – fell short of reaching that crucial goal.

Talk about a very near miss!

Who knows if RPC1063 really sent those patients into remission, either? After all, at least some of the patients who received nothing but a placebo actually wound up recovering on their own.

Company insiders have already struck it rich regardless. Unwilling to wait for Receptos to determine whether its experimental UC treatment actually works or not, a crowd of senior executives recently jumped at the chance to hit a surefire jackpot instead.

Earlier this week, nearly half-a-dozen members of the senior management team – including the CEOthe chief medical officerthe chief scientific officerthe chief technology officer and the senior vice president of corporate development – took part in a lucrative insider-selling spree that turned all of them into overnight multimillionaires. The biggest winner by far, Receptos CEO Faheed Hasnain walked away with a gigantic $21.9 million windfall that easily exceeded all of the multimillion-dollar fortunes collected by the remaining four executives combined.


Uranium Resources: No Production, Little Cash, No Good Options Left

Shares of Uranium Resources (URRE) exploded this week as Japan hit the switch on its first nuclear reactor since the earthquake-and-tsunami fueled nuclear disaster of 2011.

The Centennial, Colo. uranium mining company idled its operations years before Japan shut down all nuke plants in the wake of the Fukushima disaster.

Yet investors have begun grabbing URRE stock on the hope that Japan’s nuclear plans might make it worthwhile for URRE to restart mining. Though the price is settling down, this speculation shot URRE shares up by a whopping 61 percent in a few days to close Wednesday at $2.49.

But all is not quite as optimistic as it seems.

“Uranium Resources will probably be bankrupt before that one plant starts up,” said an analyst who requested anonymity. “It’s a really tough situation.”

Here are highlights of the gut-wrenching situation:

*Production has ceased. URRE hasn’t produced one ounce of uranium in five years.

Here’s what a URRE filing says:

“As a result of low uranium prices, we ceased production of uranium in 2009.”

“None of URI's properties are currently in production.”

*URRE would restart mining only if uranium reaches and sustains prices above the cost of restarting and production, at least in the mid-$40 range.


PhotoMedex: Letter Alleges Faulty Equipment, Possible Cover-Up

PhotoMedex (PHMD) is poised for another shocker on top of the one sparked by its $85 million loan covenant default just described by TheStreetSweeper.

Now the TheStreetSweeper has discovered a jolting new risk wrapped up in a “Laser-gate” letter that suggests management knew about dangerous equipment problems and tried to quietly fix them, allegedly without notifying federal regulators.

Best known for TV ads touting its roughly $300 no!no! hair removers that work no better than common $3 razors, the Horsham, Pa. company’s segment under fire now is its laser business. 

TheStreetSweeper obtained a copy of a letter just sent to the FDA on Oct. 7, requesting an investigation into PHMD’s XTRAC laser machines and what the whistleblower implies may have been a company cover-up of some laser machines’ dangerous random firing action. 


PhotoMedex: Deadline Ahead; All Options Look Ugly

PhotoMedex (PHMD), maker of no!no! hair scorchers seen on TV, quickly defaulted on covenants of an $85 million loan. Now Wall Street has slashed the company’s value to less than the loan value as PHMD spirals toward an ominous deadline.

On Oct. 31, the company is expected to face one of three difficult options:

  1. Deal with a rewritten note.
  2. Continue struggling under a new forbearance.
  3. Go into foreclosure.

All options pose significant risk to investors.

“As a stock, I would not even touch it,” said analyst Hamed Khorsand of BWS Financial.

Depending on the solution lenders settle on, PHMD’s next steps would be to: Somehow drastically increase sales, try to sell stock to wary investors, or sell assets.

“I’ve seen stories like this before where companies can’t get out of it,” Mr. Khorsand said.

“And eventually it becomes a zero.”

Already Wall Street considers the company worth about $80 million – far less than the $106 million PHMD paid for LCA-Visionlaser vision correction clinics.

The scenario does not look good to Mr. Khorsand, who folded his long position last spring after two years of coverage, primarily because he surmised that PHMD didn’t answer him honestly and “I don’t like management that lies to me.”

“LCA isn’t making money and no! no! is not making money and they’re out of Japan,” where no!no! was once distributed, said Mr. Khorsand. “So it’s too many issues.”

TheStreetSweeper warned investors that PHMD would lose distribution in Japan.

And we described other daunting risks, some directly related to product quality, including a bizarre adverse event reported to the FDA involving one of PHMD’s laser instruments. During a surgery last year, the laser reportedly started a fire inside the patient’s throat.  

Read about those warnings, expensive lawsuits, an insider labeled a thug and many other issues in TheStreetSweeper’s two previous stories here and here. Investors may find other viewpoints here.

And PHMD faces even more pressure, thanks to more issues TheStreetSweeper will describe very soon in our next article on PHMD.

PHMD did not return TheStreetSweeper’s numerous requests for comment.


Vimicro: James Bond Might Say, "A Storm's Coming" For This Spy Company

Vimicro International (VIMC), a Chinese company that makes video cameras for spying, has fallen under our surveillance. And investors won’t like what we’ve uncovered.

Founded in 1999 in the People’s Republic of China, the company’s video processing business quickly declined and the focus has sharpened on security video systems sold in China.

 “It’s a fairly boring hardware business,” yawned an analyst. “There are companies hundreds of times better that are in a better position … And over time, Vimicro’s margins are going to shrink further and further.”

VIMC’s stock gyrations have been anything but boring recently.

In a year of mediocrity, the stock price screamed from a few bucks to the $10 level in a spillover from investor interest in GoPro (GPRO) action camera and the Ferguson incident, as well as some VIMC hype. The stock is now above the sole analyst’s price target of $10, yet analysts we’ve spoken with think the stock is worth half that.

For this company, “A storm’s coming,” as secret agent 007 James Bond said. Here’s why we’re blowing the cover on this company that reported a $56 million net loss over the last three years:

  1. Insiders racing to sell; millions more shares may be ready to zing investors.

Options for 2.3 million shares at $0.195 expired just last week. That amounts to about 20 percent of outstanding shares.


IBIO: A Wannabe Ebola Player Infecting Buyers with False Hope

Shame on iBio (Nasdaq: IBIO) for pulling a dangerous stunt that could soon cost its shareholders a staggering fortune. No matter how tempted IBIO might have felt to further capitalize on the Ebola scare – or how thrilled it must be with the immediate results – the company should have known better than to hype a vague possibility so remote that it looks downright farfetched.

Get ready for the truth to unfold and reality to exact its inevitable toll.

Let’s cut to the chase and get straight to the point. In short, IBIO has suggested that its technology might play a serious role in the mass-production of a promising new Ebola drug that already utilizes a rival delivery system to handle that process instead. Since IBIO has so far tested its own delivery system on just a handful of vaccines in early-stage safety trials – and the company never even bothered to mention the word “Ebola” in its recent 92-page 10K report – the government might feel understandably reluctant to let some manufacturer casually substitute the firm’s experimental technology for the very platform used to engineer that vital treatment and simply hope that it produces the same kind of results.

Last week, in fact, the head of the government-funded lab where IBIO would like to offer its services virtually ruled out the likelihood of any changes to the existing process at all. Look at the revealing comments shared by Dr. Brett Girior, chief executive of the health science center at Texas A&M, in the following excerpt from a recent media report:

“’We believe there are substantial opportunities to increase the yield of ZMapp’ (the new Ebola treatment) in plants while keeping the product the same,’ Giroir said in an interview. The compound needs to be identical to what Mapp (the maker of the drug) has already vetted in animals, ‘or you would have to go back to the beginning for safety testing,’ he said.”

Based upon the information that we’ve uncovered while conducting our extensive research, we feel so confident that IBIO will play no role in the urgent mass-production of ZMapp that we dare the company to present any concrete evidence that clearly suggests otherwise. We also strongly encourage bullish investors to present the same type of request to IBIO or, better yet, Caliber Biotherapeutics -- the firm that IBIO likes to treat as its potential ticket to the ZMapp production line – since they have put so much money on the line. We highly doubt that they’ll feel quite so confident in their investment once they finish that exercise, but we invite them to share any feedback that might prove us wrong as well. 


Solazyme: It Isn't Easy (Or Profitable) Being Green

Trouble is blowing the lids off the petri dishes at Solazyme (SZYM), where the company has fruitlessly toiled for 11 years at turning sugar and algae into profit.

The San Francisco, Calif. oil-maker’s income statement and analyst estimates are already steeped in red.

It battles increasing net losses (note that, besides Sephora and other stores, SZYM also  unfortunately hitched its wagon to badly aging JC Penney (JCP)which traded ~$30 then, ~$7 now) as SZYM produces “green” wrinkle cream from algae.

SZYM also faces a massive string of red flags poised to smother its effort to create renewable oils and chemicals for various markets from its sugar-fed algae.

*Plant shutdown likely dings oil production effort

SZYM first pushed out some commercial oil and drilling lubricant in May from a small area at Brazil’s Moema Plant that the townspeople call “the annex.” CEO Jonathan Wolfson understandably trumpeted the event resulting from a joint venture with Bunge, yet warned, “We have work ahead … establishing consistent production and reliable supply and from there we’ll turn to the ramp up process.”

But production and supply problems already appear to be damaging that ramp-up. Layoffs occurred when the annex lurched to a temporary standstill while a cranky boiler was repaired, according to our source located near the plant in the sugar cane heartland in Sao Palo, Brazil.

SZYM on Oct. 9 offered the sketchiest plant update, describing production of only “modest quantities” of oils, warning:

“… downstream processes at Moema require further optimization and are not yet operating on a fully integrated basis. This is an area of significant focus and ongoing improvement."

So this suggests the plant is not scaling up according to expectations. 

Indeed, some analysts seem nervous about SZYM’s future, with PiperJaffray leading the pack with its issued “Underweight” rating, writing:

“… a lack of visibility into the scale-up at Moema in terms of committed contracts, timelines, and general plant operations underscore our Underweight thesis."

The analyst also complained about “very limited visibility/obfuscation into tangible productions metrics” and added:

“High variable costs and fixed cost absorption should start to ramp quickly at Moema, against limited volumes during the plant start-up. We believe that, ultimately, low sales volumes and high fixed costs will beget poorer than expected economics in an effort to secure volumes."

Credit Suisse wrote more gently last week about giving SZYM a “neutral” rating and estimating a $1.66 loss per share this year, while PiperJaffray raised the expected net loss to $1.93.

Other viewpoints on SZYM may be found here.


Accelerate Diagnostics: Mistakenly Rewarded and Now Destined to Collapse?

Accelerate Diagnostics (Nasdaq: AXDX) might need to credit a “false positive” for making its stock price look so much healthier these days. Mistaken by some as a promising Ebola play, AXDX has skyrocketed in value over the course of the past few weeks – its share price, up almost 70%, escalating right along with fears of that horrific virus – even though its experimental device specifically focuses on the detection and treatment of stubborn bacterial infections instead.

“Everyone is looking … for the Ebola plays,” one bullish investor noted on StockTwits last week. “Rumor has it AXDX has the inside track on detection. Chart(s) don’t lie.”

They sure are subject to correction, though. You be the judge. Take a close look at the curious nature of the incredible rally that has AXDX just staged, and see if you still believe that its highflying stock can hang onto those inexplicable gains.


Accidental Explosion?

With no major developments on the horizon, AXDX actually spent most of September drifting steadily lower until Ebola began to dominate the national headlines and sent traders on a breathless chase for related investment opportunities. Down to $16.50 a share a few short weeks ago, AXDX suddenly reversed course and then proceeded to rocket all the way past $30 a share just a few days after Ebola officially surfaced inside the United States to pose a serious threat right here at home.

As a bleeding highflier that’s currently valued at more than $1.2 billion – the equivalent of 23,300 times its prior-year revenue – AXDX now looks rather dangerous itself.

Indeed, based upon any reasonable measure of its performance, AXDX actually looked wildly expensive even before it racked up those inexplicable gains. Little more than a development-stage company in spite of its lengthy 32-year history (tarnished by regulatory sanctions discussed in more detail below), AXDX has yet to even seek – let alone secure – government approval for the “BACcel” diagnostic testing system that became its primary focus at least a full decade ago. With little revenue and no expectations of actual profits anytime soon, AXDX has nevertheless managed to achieve a market capitalization so generous that it literally exceeds the estimated value that the firm once assigned to the entire market that it has long aimed to serve.

So don’t be surprised if AXDX suddenly takes a dramatic turn for the worse. With its highflying shares arguably priced beyond perfection at current levels, the stock could easily sink for all sorts of reasons. Just think of the brutal correction that AXDX might endure if the market simply discounted its stock to reflect the following:


Glu Mobile: Coming Unglued...

Kim Kardashian and crew’s fading “reign of terror,” first grabbed the imagination of mainstream media less than a year ago. It seems Ms. Kardashian’s post-baby bikini shot plastered on US Weekly’s cover sold 100,000 fewer magazines than usual and sounded the warning that the star’s popularity is beginning to drain away quicker than you can say, “Snap a salacious selfie!”

That’s downright depressing news … for Glu Mobile (GLUU).

The 13-year-old San Francisco, Calif. mobile game maker’s free game Kim Kardashian: Hollywood initially rocketed the share price to the stars from $3.78   to $7.47, higher than any time since 2007. 

But most investors didn’t realize that when the company launched the game app on June 25, GLUU arrived late to the Kardashian party. 

Ms. Kardashian’s fading stardom is just the beginning of an A-list of slipups that we believe make GLUU stock an ugly bet:

*SLIP-UP NUMBER 1 - Kim Kardashian has taken a dramatic free-fall since the game’s debut. 

Downloads of the Kim apps have fallen, reflecting the namesake’s fading popularity. The download rank is trending downward. Kim captured number 69 overall in iPhone download ranking in early September, as the chart below shows. But the ranking has tumbled precipitously to number 163.


Confession Time: Miller Reveals That Its Stock Is Practically Worthless

Miller Energy Resources (NYSE: MILL) better watch its mouth. Earlier this week, the bleeding energy firm accidentally told the truth.

Believe it or not, Miller practically admitted that it’s wildly overvalued by releasing figures that basically indicate that its $5 stock should actually fetch less than 10% of that generous price.

Just wait until the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission finds out about this news. After fielding so many questions from the SEC about the reported value of its assets, Miller might as well go ahead assume that regulators will probably notice some new disclosures that make the $230 million company – strapped for cash, with less than $4 million in the bank – look virtually worthless right now.

Don’t take our word for that jarring conclusion. Feel free to double-check our math. We relied on a simple formula – using numbers provided by Miller itself – to determine that the company is likely worth no more than a measly 45 cents a share.


Digital Ally: This Movie Has A Bad Ending

Digital Ally (DGLY) stock has soared over 386 percent amid calls for cops to wear body cameras following the Ferguson, Mo. police officer shooting of an unarmed teenager. DGLY took advantage of an unbelievable run in the stock for a small raise, a heady but ridiculous action in light of how short DGLY falls below the industry leaders.

We’ve seen this movie before and we know there is absolutely no justification for the stock’s crazy run from about $3.80 in one astonishing month to today’s nearly $20.

Here are TheStreetSweeper’s top reasons we believe this DGLY movie will end badly:

  1. National interest is in police body cameras, not DGLY’s old technology.


The old dash cameras – DGLY’s key product – are not even part of the national conversation.

"The recent emergence of body-worn cameras has already had an impact on policing, and this impact will only increase as more agencies adopt this technology,'' said Chuck Wexler, executive director of the Police Executive Research Forum, author of a recent report on the use of police body cameras.

Yet, the in-car video recording system constitutes 90 percent of DGLY’s already falling revenue and rising operating losses of about $1 million.  


  1. Old technology = falling revenue.

DGLY’s in-car video revenue will likely continue to erode due to superior, cheaper body cameras offered by well-known vendors such as stun-gun maker Taser International (TASR), a profitable company up 43 percent since Ferguson to $17 plus change.

CNBC’s Jim Cramer said police wearable video will likely become the new normal and that market is owned by Taser.  

Wearable cameras provide superior video footage that provides up-close and point-of-view, non-tamper recording compared with in-car video.

At $399 Taser’s Axon is 10 times cheaper than DGLY’s $4,000 dash camera.

Indeed, DGLY’s old technology is clearly already feeling the pressure. Describing the company’s decline in gross profit, its last quarterly filing said:

“However, we are experiencing increased price competition and pressure from certain of our competitors that has led to pricing discounts on larger contract opportunities. We expect that this pricing pressure will continue as our competitors attempt to regain market share and revive sales and that it will have some negative impact on our efforts to improve gross margins during 2014.”


Mandalay Digital Group: An Overhyped Master of Positive Spin?


Give Mandalay Digital Group (Nasdaq: MNDL) credit for this much, at least. While the bleeding technology firm still needs to prove itself, the company has definitely mastered the art of positive spin.

A recent penny stock that spent years constantly reinventing itself in a desperate attempt to merely survive, Mandalay may have just pulled off its most impressive transformation yet. Suddenly worth more than $200 million – before clearing its first dime – Mandalay has practically doubled in value over the course of two short weeks with the help of some tantalizing, if temporary, hype.

Just don’t expect those breathtaking gains to actually last. Consider the following:

Worth barely $3 a share ahead of its latest quarterly miss, Mandalay has since rocketed to a multi-year high of $6 a share after announcing a celebrated deal with Verizon (NYSE: VZ) and delaying the release of crucial details while the ensuing hype sent its stock on a powerful tear. With Mandalay encouraging investors to hope for the best, they have responded by allowing their imaginations to literally run wild. Clearly sold on the stock and expecting it to gain even further ground, one bullish hedge fund manager recently stepped forward to ridicule the so-called “moron” who chose to slash his massive position in the company despite exciting news of the celebrated Verizon deal.

“Who the hell is selling at these prices in light of this news?” the hedge fund manager recently demanded before declaring, “Why should we care?

“Worrying about who is selling or how much more is coming for sale is extremely short-sighted when we know we have a deal in hand that completely changes everything. (So) waiting for the ‘cleanup’ trade is rather pointless, given where it should be trading when the world wakes up to what is occurring …

“The size and the scope of the VZ announcement is almost too big to fathom. But make no mistake: It is huge.”

Really? How do you know? So far, even Mandalay itself has yet to determine – or at least divulge -- the true value of that mysterious deal.

You’re probably right about one thing, however. The identity of the recent seller doesn’t really matter. Ask yourself a far more relevant question: Why did that big Mandalay shareholder chose to dump all of that stock instead of holding out for even sweeter gains or – better yet – buying some more of the highflying shares?

Let’s go back to the conference call that sparked this incredible rally in the first place and search for some possible hints. An expert at translating overblown hype, TheStreetSweeper has carefully read between the lines to uncover plenty of revealing clues.


FuelCell Energy: Will The Plug Be Pulled On This Overvalued Company?

If only we lived in that magical world where we could scrape up leftovers from Sunday dinner, plop them into a device, add a dollop of fat and presto – the air conditioner churns on uninterrupted. And no messy rendering required between steps.

In that world, FuelCell Energy (FCEL) might also become profitable. Or at least its stock price would rise and fall based on FCEL itself, rather than the misconceived mirroring of Plug Power. Most of all, FCEL would not be poised to lose its biggest customer.

But this is the real world. And it’s inconceivable to TheStreetSweeper how a company with multiple issues plus an accumulated deficit exceeding $797 million could be worth anything approaching $1 billion.

“Anytime you’re a single-dollar or two-dollar stock, there’s a reason you’re a single-dollar or two-dollar stock,” said Jake Dollarhide, CEO of Longbow Asset Management. “They announced they’re cutting costs. Well cutting costs is not what you always want to hear – especially when it’s a new concept company that doesn’t have mass scale at this point.”

The stock has a lot of people spooked. During “Lighting Round” Tuesday on CNBC, analyst Jim Cramer said this about FCEL:

 “Ahhh, Fuelcell! I mean, you know, these are just total rank speculation stories. I can’t go there,” Cramer said.

 “I’ve got a lot of solid companies that have really good fundamentals that are inexpensive,” he added. “I’m not going FuelCell.”

Indeed, this is a company that is:

  1. Poised to lose its biggest customer.
  2. Riding high on a misconceived notion.
  3. Selling stock. And we wouldn’t be surprised to see more.
  4. Can’t seem to scale.
  5. Losing money faster than you can say, “Fool cells.”
  6. Sporting a completely unjustified market cap.

We see stubborn challenges for the Danbury, Conn.-based company that makes and sells fuel cells that generate electricity.



Synthesis Energy Systems: Running Out Of Gas

Synthesis Energy Systems (SYMX) is trying to hit the gas but the coal gasification company’s problems keep slamming on the brakes. TheStreetSweeper believes its many issues will continue to build into a swerving, stop-and-go ride sure to leave investors screaming to get off.

Key aspects of the Houston company and the coal gasification business have convinced us that the worst is not yet behind SYMX or those brave souls still holding onto the stock.

It’s been just eight months since SYMX restarted its plant in China after a long, painful 2-year shutdown that left SYMX’s market cap practically sitting on empty. Finally able to sell the product, the company’s stock price revved back up to reasonable levels before taking a recent, brief U-turn on some big trades and rumors that the co-founder and chief commercial officer has grabbed his truck-load of shares and taken the nearest exit. The stock price, however, is now recovering.

But the stock value likely will once again hit the skids because we believe SYMX will soon have to shut down its ZZ plant again.

The company offered a rebuttal by email through spokeswoman Susan Roush.

“As for your query about current methanol prices, when commodity prices are lower such as they are now, the plants are able to operate in different modes and continue to generate revenues,” she said.

While TheStreetSweeper believes it could operate in different modes, we do not believe it could generate any significant revenues by doing so - especially considering its track record.  A company filing says this:

“The Supplementary Agreement also provides that, to the extent Hai Hua has an unscheduled shutdown, and the plant continues to operate on standby during such period, Hai Hua is still required to pay the energy fee to the ZZ Joint Venture.”

So the plant would be operating and, under that scenario, the revenue could be expected to be the undoubtedly insignificant fee.

The “clean coal” company sells its coal-based syngas technology and equipment to its partner in China. Zao Zhuang, or ZZ, uses the syngas with coke oven gas to produce methanol, which is used to produce more complex chemicals or blended with gasoline for motor fuel. Naturally, ZZ wants as high a price as possible from its methanol. And a high price is necessary because operating expenses are so high.

Now, methanol prices are hovering around a 2-year low, threatening to once again shutter the plant. SYMX stands to face not quite the revenue drop to zero that it suffered last shutdown, but a significant sales decline all the same.


Sphere 3D: A Ticking Time Bomb Set to Self-Destruct?

* Editor's Note: The following article is the latest of four investigative reports that TheStreetSweeper has published on Sphere 3D, as it continues to move forward with its ongoing investigation of the company. TheStreetSweeper plans to share any major, new discoveries that it uncovers during the course of the research process.

Sphere 3D (Nasdaq: ANY; TSXV: ANY.V) can thank a former regulatory target with a lousy trading record for much of the buying pressure that has allowed its highflying stock to resist the pesky forces of gravity.

With Sphere 3D ranking as a standout performer in the miserable portfolio that determines the size of his annual bonus, Pinetree Capital CEO Sheldon Inwentash has repeatedly stepped forward to bolster the value of that risky investment by purchasing much of the stock that others have understandably chosen to sell. Just go back a few weeks ago for a particularly striking example. When TheStreetSweeper published the latest in a string of disturbing reports on Sphere 3D earlier this month, Inwentash responded by purchasing so much stock that he literally wound up buying more than half of all the shares that changed hands on the open market that day. (The next section of this report presents a full account of those trades in graphic detail.)

A former penny stock that barely topped the 50-cent mark as recently as last summer, Sphere 3D rocketed all the way to a record-breaking high above $11 a share with the help of that powerful buying spree.

Sphere 3D better hope that it fares a whole lot better than most of the other stocks that Inwentash has purchased after Pinetree blew millions on their ill-fated shares, however. Just look at the dismal performance of the investments that cost Pinetree the most. Even with Inwentash splurging on all of those stocks himself – often at prices well above those fetched on the open market today – most of them still trade in the low end of their 52-week range.


Advanced Emissions Solutions (ADES): Clean-up Solutions Company Faces Its Biggest Mess Ever - Itself

Investing in Advanced Emissions Solutions (ADES) is a little like buying land in Florida, sight unseen.

It looks incredibly gorgeous, “green” and tempting at first. Yet after digging deeper, you discover you’ve bought swampland infested with alligators flashing toothy grins. That’s what TheStreetSweeper found in this Highlands Ranch, Colo. holding company specializing in clean solutions for coal-fired power plants.

A superficial look shows its stock price flying near $23, not very far below its $29 record, as the company peels out optimistic press releases on a plant lease deal and a new finance committee.

But with deeper inspection, ADES’ alligators look awfully ugly and hungry. The company stands knee-deep in class action lawsuits alleging securities law violations and “false and/or misleading” statements tied to financial reports that must be restated – and a NASDAQ delisting threat that ADES can’t seem to shake.

Unfortunately, ADES very efforts to try to clean up three quarters – and likely more - of unreliable, consequently misleading financial statements are already snake-bitten.


ADES has hand-picked a rogues’ gallery of handsome men to fix its financial mess and restore investors’ confidence. We’re calling it a rogues’ gallery because this line-up, includes:


*Directors of companies wallowing in the risky penny stock world.

*Co-founders and former top executives of an emotion-charged company tottering just this side of crash and burn.

*Leaders who suddenly ran out on a company where delinquent financials almost killed its NASDAQ listing.

*Audit team members who oversaw ADES’ messy financials to begin with.

Yet these are some of the very people ADES selected to fix its financial reports. We’ll explain the details later in this report.

An ADES representative, who is traveling, plans to interview with TheStreetSweeper so we can write a follow-up.

Investors may find various viewpoints on ADES here.

Let’s take a closer look at issues that make the ADES denizen-infested swampland look so treacherous to today’s investors:



Sphere 3D: Rewarded for a Shotgun Wedding That's Doomed to Backfire?

Maybe Sphere 3D (TSXV: ANY.V) finds some way to look busy if it actually expects company. The bleeding technology firm seemed almost lifeless when TheStreetSweeper paid a surprise visit to its Canadian headquarters on a recent weekday, however, arriving fairly late in the morning to find the executive suite empty and just a tiny handful of underlings inside the entire facility.

To be sure, Sphere 3D looked nothing like a $250 million corporation that had just offered a fortune to merge with a far more established – but increasingly desperate – company by using its highflying stock as valuable currency.

With little (if any) sign of activity two hours into a regular workday, Sphere 3D barely even seemed open for business at all. The poor receptionist who actually bothered to report for duty on time must have felt understandably bored.  

No telephone calls to answer from patient customers eagerly awaiting the overdue Glassware 2.0 “virtualization” platform that Sphere 3D has trumpeted as a revolutionary breakthrough – set to take the challenging market by storm -- for years. No meetings to orchestrate with important clients seeking to order the V3 storage solution that Sphere 3D inherited from a dinky firm accused of blatantly stealing its assets before it officially changed hands. No appointments to keep with hopeful investors willing to place risky bets on Sphere 3D, either, especially now that the bleeding rollup company trades at a staggering 250 times its prior-year pro forma sales

Nothing but a nosy reporter from TheStreetSweeper marveling at the outdated technology that Sphere 3D had chosen to prominently display in its front office – a collection of old-fashioned calculators, a leftover Sony Walkman, an early version of the Blackberry that looked downright “modern” in comparison to the rest – since the company has yet to make a name for itself by launching a proven commercial product of its own.


TechTarget: Google's Panda Crushes Visibility


TechTarget (TTGT) has peered into the gaping jaws of death.

And those jaws belong to … a Panda.

Not China’s bamboo-chomping bear. Rather, it was Google’s Panda update designed to snuff out low quality content from Google’s top search results pages.

Many companies have suffered crushing declines in Google impressions caused by last month’s Panda update – and corresponding losses in stock value.

Now, TheStreetSweeper has found an overlooked Panda victim - TTGT.

Shares of the Newton, Mass. company – which is focused on drawing traffic to generate IT leads - hit this year’s high of $8.46 on June 10.

However, the market was unaware that weeks earlier the company lost more than 33 percent in search visibility, according to a list of losers and winners.

With TTGT’s significant decline in SEO visibility – which happened around the same time of a 5-million-share secondary offering - we think the market has missed a crucial factor.

We believe the stock faces much more significant consequences than the 28 percent stock value slashing endured by a peer company caught by Panda.

In a statement released to TheStreetSweeper, TTGT said organic traffic remains ahead of last year.

“Our experience with the recent Google algorithm changes is consistent with what we’ve seen on previous algorithm changes over the almost 15 years that we have been in business. We operate over 100 websites, and in the immediate aftermath of a algorithm change we see some sites traffic increase and others decline.”

“On a broader point – our experience is that there is an enormous amount of fluctuation after a major Google algorithm change.”

TTGT went on to say that the company has adapted to the changes and established a successful track record in terms of how the changes play out.

If so, we’re not sure why insiders have been selling. Regardless, investors may find various viewpoints on TTGT here.


Jealously guarding its top search market share, Google began using code-named Panda in 2011 to filter out poor content so that higher quality content would rise in search rankings.    

Google’s leader of the Webspam team, Matt Cutts, tweeted the launch of the Panda update on May 20. Within days, many websites watched as the dreaded drop in organic rankings turned into reality.

Digital coupon marketer RetailMeNot (SALE) fell victim to Panda’s 4.0 wallop, according to Searchmetrics. SALE suffered a huge loss in its Google impressions and, within days, a record decline in stock.

SALE plummeted more than $8 – 28 percent – in just a few days. About three weeks later, SALE still has not been able to climb back to its old highflying $30 level.


Bio-Reference: A Scary Review of Its Own Genetic Test


No wonder Bio-Reference Laboratories (Nasdaq: BRLI) has found itself waiting months for health insurers to review – and, in many cases, ultimately reject – big-ticket claims for its lucrative specialty tests.

Take a look at InheriGen, the flagship panel sold by the company’s booming genetics division, for a rather obvious clue. A $3,600 screening tool packed with tests for all sorts of wildly obscure inherited disorders – far exceeding the handful recommended for the sound practice of medicine – InheriGen literally costs so much that it can easily double, if not triple, the normal cost for comprehensive prenatal care. Even GenPap, the notoriously elaborate -- and expensive -- panel aggressively marketed by the company’s gigantic women’s health division – looks somewhat modest in comparison, despite all of the controversy surrounding that glorified Pap smear.

“The reason why Bio-Reference can get away with this,” explained one of several former sales representative who volunteered similar stories, “is because the company trains you to routinely say, ‘There is no risk to the doctor or the patient. If the insurance company doesn’t pay, we’ll reduce the bill.’

“Some reps would receive up to 15 calls a day from patients upset about getting stuck with a $2,000 bill for GenPap, when they just wanted a regular Pap smear. We dealt with complaints like that every day. It was our job to take those calls and reduce the bill to $195 (a price resembling those charged for more traditional Pap smears.) If a patient sounded really angry – and we felt worried that they might report us – we could zero out the entire balance …

“Then Bio-Reference would just write it off. They wrote off a lot of business when I was there.”  

That sort of business strikes many doctors -- including a prominent member of the National Physicians Alliance -- as a pointless, if not dangerous, waste of precious resources in the first place. Even before former NPA president Dr. Cheryl Bettigole learned that Bio-Reference commands thousands of dollars for its popular Inherigen and GenPap tests, she felt compelled to sound a loud alarm in The New England Journal of Medicine about expensive screening tools that look almost cheap in comparison. So Dr. Bettigole likely meant business when she responded to that jarring discovery with plans to approach NPA policymakers about taking a public stand against the even pricier screening panels that Bio-Reference has successfully pitched to so many oblivious physicians as phenomenal deals.

“It’s demonically brilliant,” Dr. Bettigole bluntly declared upon hearing the crafty sales pitch relayed to TheStreetSweeper by former Bio-Reference insiders once forced to use that deceptive marketing strategy themselves. “I would like to send information about these tests to our policy committee. This is exactly the kind of issue that the NPA looks at …

“We have an OB/GYN (obstetrician/gynecologist) on our committee,” Dr. Bettigole further volunteered. “ACOG, the American Congress of Obstetrics and Gynecology, is wonderfully productive,” too.

Talk about a possible disaster.

As a lab that depends heavily (if not entirely) on brisk sales of big-ticket screening panels to fuel its outsized growth, Bio-Reference can hardly afford for an influential medical society to publicly denounce the flagship panels marketed by the very specialty divisions responsible for so much of its remarkable success. With health insurers already intensifying their scrutiny of its lucrative specialty tests, a trend vividly illustrated by the recent surge in its days sales outstanding (DSOs) and its bad-debt expense, Bio-Reference better hope that it can avoid pesky interference from powerful – and increasingly cost-conscious – medical societies that often play a vital role in shaping coverage decisions.


Sphere 3D Merger Threatens to Eat Companies Alive

Overland Storage knows a zombie when it sees one. The irony is that the one it sees at the moment is Sphere 3D (ANY.V), the very company that is buying Overland (OVRL).

The two unprofitable companies last week announced an all-stock deal worth over $80 million that within the next four months would hand Overland assets to its current partner, Sphere 3D. Canada-based technology company Sphere 3D trades on the Canadian exchange as “ANY.V” and over-the-counter as “SPIHF.”

Overland considers Sphere 3D in such horrible shape and of so little promise, it acknowledged in its Securities and Exchange Commission filings that ANY.V is entirely capable of pulling down wounded Overland.

Here are a couple highlights straight out of California-based Overland’s 10-Q, filed the same day ANY.V made an astounding offer - a 53 percent premium (~$4.40 offered for shares that closed at $2.90) to buy out Overland:

* “Sphere 3D may not be able to achieve or maintain revenues or profitability”

* “Limited trading of Sphere 3D’s stock on the TSX Venture Exchange”

Overland crammed its filings with shockers guaranteed to worry any investors who might assume ANY.V has found a wealthy sugar daddy to revive the company (though the merger depends partially on ANY.V setting up “bought deal” financing in order to loan Overland $5 million.) These shockers include:

*Overland has $2.4 million cash and about $4.9 million in short term investment – and got $1.7 million cash from its acquisition of Tandberg four months ago.

*Though revenue reached $20.2 million, recurring losses and negative cash flows “raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.”

*Net loss to Overland shareholders is 44 cents. (Net loss of ANY.V shareholders is 4 cents.)

Under the terms of the merger, ANY.V will issue 9.4 million shares on closing, expected sometime between July 1 and September 30.

At recent prices, the terms would spike ANY.V’s market cap from about $190 million to an even more outlandish $270 million.

So that’s $270 million for a Canadian overhyped, over-the-counter zombie company propped up by a suffering San Diego misfit.


Sphere 3D: Cloud Company Can’t Rise Above Hype, Mistakes And Poor Management


From its rocky beginnings as a fake mining company to its absurd overpayment for a little two-man shop, Sphere 3D Corp. (ANY.V) has signaled the true meaning of the “D” in its name: “Deep six” this stock before it’s too late.

The Canadian technology company has gone screaming into the stratosphere. The stock smashed new 52-week highs five times in three months and is trading on the TSXV Canadian exchange as “ANY.V.” Now at around $9, the stock is also listed on the alternative trading system OTCQB as “SPIHF.”

But research by TheStreetSweeper indicates all the screaming will soon be done by ANY.V investors pushing and shoving and galloping for the exits.

What’s behind all the recent excitement surrounding the stock of a company that reported zero revenue last year?  Blatant, baseless promotions by a company desperate to get listed on the NASDAQ’s subsidiary OMX. Additionally, retail investors anticipate that ANY.V’s earnings report later this month might finally show some commercial revenue for its emulation and virtualization product. The patent-pending technology is designed to make applications run on a cell phone, iPad or other device as easily as they run on a person’s computer at home or work.

But disaster lurks. And here’s how TheStreetSweeper sees it breaking out:

  • Hype at its best. Bought-and-paid-for promotions artificially kick the stock price over the moon.
  • Currently no real commercial product.
  • No organic sales. ANY.V pays dearly to claim an acquisition’s puny sales as its own.
  • Looming options and warrants poised to hit the market.
  • Large salaries for inexperienced execs, little money, big cash burn with a need to burn multi-millions more. We believe it’s all too clear - dilution is imminent.

ANY.V has not responded to TheStreetSweeper's request for comment.


ANY.V proudly links to not one - not two - not six - but nine articles in How to Find Big Stocks. These promos of ANY.V seem just a little like the kind of material sent out by Jonathon Lebed, a stock promoter and newsletter writer noted for his youthful brush with the US Securities and Exchange Commission and his disclosure urging people never to trade on his advice unless they’re prepared to lose the entire investment.

In fact, ANY.V is so desperate for attention, the company has taken on its own promoter. That hired gun is USA Investor Link, pulling in $10,000 monthly plus about $2.8 million in stock options.

CEO Peter Tassiopoulos issued a statement in March 2013 about hiring USA Investor Link to address the “increased interest we are receiving from the investment and business community.”

Let’s just take a look at USA Investor’s previous clients… Whoa – maybe ANY.V should have done some due diligence before peeling off investors’ hard-earned dollars to pay the two-man USA Investor Link.

Almost exactly a year before ANY.V’s announcement about its USA Investor deal, Canada-based NWM Mining Corp. (NWMMF) issued its own statement about hiring USA Investor “due to a significant increase in the level of interest from the U.S. Investment community …” If anyone’s interested now, a share of NWM Mining costs just a fraction of a penny.  


Amyris: Onerous Deals, SEC Filings And Extreme Insider Selling Rough Up This Biotech

Amyris Inc. (NasdaqGS: AMRS) has fallen victim to loan sharks wearing black hoodies, steel-toed boots and perfectly wicked sneers, its SEC filings suggest.

Now the California biotech’s new filings show it’s gotten stuck with a $25 million debt financing deal spiked with – don’t you love the word - “covenants” so draconian they’ll set your hair on fire.

Don’t take TheStreetSweeper’s word for it. Take the words from the company’s recent filing with the US Securities and Exchange Commission.  With that costly loan deal and others in its frayed coat pocket, poor AMRS is in such a fix it may:

“…need to issue …  discounted equity, agree to onerous covenants …”

Now, AMRS may be in an even worse fix as the company approaches its quarterly earnings call scheduled for Thursday, May 8. The company has reported worse earnings numbers over each of the past five quarters than those anticipated by analysts – and those experts expected earnings losses as bad as 29-to-45 cents. Analysts this quarter expect a loss of about 28 cents per share.

Insiders and others may feel their trigger finger quivering right now. AMRS is trading at about $3.35 per share yet there are options as cheap as $2.15. With 76.4 million shares outstanding, an astonishing 54.7 million shares could potentially hit the market.

“The upside of any equity investor would be severely limited by these options,” said an analyst who requested anonymity.

Despite all this – plus the fact that the CEO himself has eagerly sold off some $8.9 million worth of AMRS shares and evidently has remained equally busy counting proceeds from his days as prior director of a dying biofuels company – AMRS chief executive John Melo recently asserted that the company has quite the 2014 business plan.

Mr. Melo, however, forgot to tell investors the SEC-filing details of the business plan that form the company’s exit strategy.


Shock therapy: Cyberonics link to deaths and injuries


Judy Bowling could easily complete the night shift at a New York medical clinic, drive the 20-mile commute back home, yank off her favorite green scrubs and grab a few hours of sleep. After school, the single mom and her young daughter would often jump in the car so the child could spend the night with Ms. Bowling’s parents, giving the two some cherished “girl time” during the drive.  

But life changed radically after Ms. Bowling had a “VNS” device by Cyberonics (Nasdaq: CYBX) implanted inches above her heart to try to control her epileptic seizures with tiny electric shocks transmitted to the brain.

She is one of thousands of patients who have been implanted with the device that Dr. Peter Barglow terms, “completely worthless.”

“I’d never dream of subjecting anyone to that sort of nonsense,” said Dr. Barglow, an MD with more than five decades in the psychiatry field, now handling a busy practice in Berkeley, Calif. After extensive examination of the issue and VNS studies, he said he considers any association with VNS irrational.

In Ms. Bowling’s case, the seizures became worse, and she quickly spiraled downward both physically and mentally.

Ms. Bowling’s experience is one of more than 9,000 Cyberonics-linked injury reports submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration from 1998 to this month.

In fact, more than 1,980 Cyberonics-linked death reports were uncovered in our investigation.

These “adverse events” resulted from the device made and touted by a company staggering beneath two extensive FDA warning letters and targeted by a US Senate investigation into effectiveness and safety concerns. And the heat’s still on as this company faces a false claims lawsuit that we believe has ample potential to move forward.


Ocean Power Technologies (OPTT): Wave Goodbye To This Wave Power Company

Ocean Power Technologies (Nasdaq: OPTT) might blow its rivals out of the water – if only it could deliver projects like it delivers regurgitated news.

OPTT stock was swimming with the bottom feeders when the company announced a multimillion-dollar Australian deal in January with the following deceptive headline:

Ocean Power Technologies Announces Funding Agreement With Australian Government For A$66.5 Million Grant

Bam! Shares jumped with the announcement by 52.9 percent in premarket trading to $3.38.

But here’s the deal: OPTT had already announced the grant - five years ago. Here is that headline:

Ocean Power Technologies Wins Funding From The Australian Federal Government

The January press release actually announced Aussie funding from the original grant would be available for phase one and two, plus OPTT would now have to meet more milestones. So this carefully crafted news release isn’t really surprising, positive news at all. The market - eager for a hint of good news - took off and ran with it.

“Fool the investors” works this week, too

Buoyed by previous misleading regurgitated announcements, OPTT tried it again Tuesday.

This time, the regurgitated gem reads:

Ocean Power Technologies Announces Victorian Wave Partners Has Received A$5 Million Initial Grant Funding From Australian Renewable Energy Agency

Many people mistook the announcement to mean that OPTT was getting a fresh batch of funding. The sound of the Australia project apparently finally running toward its power-wave goal - combined with the sound of investors pushing the “buy” function - was truly deafening. 

The stock price exploded almost 9 percent to $4.06.

What was wrong with this announcement? First, the $4.6 million (US dollars) grant was already assumed because execs in March said, Australia, with conditions attached, would fund part of the first phase.

This is not new. And it is not new funding. In fact, the release states that grant revenue will be accounted for later, indicating OPTT doesn’t dare count it now because the company is unlikely to come up with the required matching money.

Second, the misleading headline ignores the real news that OPTT is legally required to disclose in its 8-K, US Securities and Exchange Commission filing. That real news is that the Oregon project is officially Dead Sea debris.


The US Department of Energy has terminated the remaining teeny, single-buoy contract with OPTT because the company couldn’t come up with enough money.


Key wording in the new SEC filing is: “The Company and the DOE are discussing the steps necessary to close out the project.”


OPTT’s bad habit of regurgitating “news” is just another surface wave in a growing tsunami of issues surrounding the company that has been trying since 1994 to turn electricity-generating ocean wave power into a real business.


MiMedx (MDXG): Not What The Doctor Ordered

Human placenta products peddler MiMedx (Nasdaq: MDXG) is handing out company stock like candy to doctors who “evaluate technologies” or act as consultants, TheStreetSweeper has learned.

One doctor got tens of thousands of shares of common stock without paying one single dime. Another prominent doctor on the company’s medical advisory board received options on 200,000 shares.

The company has doled out roughly 1.2 million shares of stock and options to its influential doctor friends – shares now worth more than $7 million – as its chief executive, Parker Petit, prepares to go on trial perhaps as early as next month for an alleged insider trading scheme.

Despite that, the company stock price is screaming, shoving the market cap into the stratosphere. The company is now valued at about $740 million, much higher than the entire “skin substitution” market estimated at $500 million.

Paid to do what?

MiMedx uses doctors in speaking bureaus, consulting and research. But filings also say doctors educate others about “the efficacy and uses of our products.” MiMedx’s business turns mothers’ placental membranes into “EpiFix” material used to cover injuries such as burns and diabetic foot sores, as well as “AmnioFix” for internal coverage uses such as spinal surgery and tennis elbow.

The company’s filings – pages 14 and 15 – describe some doctors’ duties this way:

“… speaking to payers about our products in support of our reimbursement efforts.”

The company also works with doctors “who may order our products or make decisions to use them,” according to this filing.

TheStreetSweeper asked the company for more details about the medical advisory board, including whether MiMedx encourages doctors to use their products. We got some answers back by email.

“Our selection of advisory board members is unrelated to their use of our products,” said the company’s lawyer, Roberta McCaw.

MiMedx uses doctors to help deliver exciting business deals while it tiptoes past kickback and false claims laws, suggests page 28 of this filing. But news reports show even big pharma sometimes fall down the slippery slope into an embarrassing, expensive legal hole that MiMedx could ill afford.

Just last November, Johnson & Johnson agreed to a $2.2 billion deal to settle government charges on false marketing claims and paying kickbacks to doctors.

Doctors get cheap stock

For investors, there’s also a personal piece to the problems inherent in MiMedx’s fraud lawsuit-saddled chief executive’s use of the medical advisory board.

Unlike the average investor, some lucky doctors have had the option to buy their stock for mere pennies-on-the-dollar. These doctors also get paid on a services rendered basis, though the company lawyer wouldn’t give details.


Will MiMedx and Its Hotshot CEO Both Go Down in Flames?

MiMedx (Nasdaq: MDXG) better hope that its precious leader can work the same kind of magic on the federal judge who will soon decide his fate as he has on the dazzled shareholders who have placed so much faith in his word.

With its treasured CEO Parker “Pete” Petit set to face trial on insider-trading charges as early as next month – and its shareholders largely oblivious to both the proximity of that courtroom battle and the gravity of its final outcome – MiMedx desperately needs that looming verdict to favor its popular chief and spare its highflying stock from the trauma of his stunning exile. After all, as graphically illustrated by the horrific 70% loss that it suffered back in September, MiMedx paid a staggering price the last time that the market felt blindsided by a major regulatory scare. Now that MiMedx has fully recovered from that nasty wound to reach even loftier highs – achieving a generous $740 million market value that literally eclipses the $500 million value recently assigned to the entire “skin substitute” market that the bleeding firm serves – the company sure would hate to plunge yet again on an overlooked danger capable of erupting into bombshell headlines like these: 






To be sure, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission seems bent on a victory that would make those jarring headlines come true. Convinced that Petit tipped off a friend about the imminent buyout of the last public company that he ran, the SEC filed charges against the veteran corporate executive back in early 2012 and – after soundly defeating his motion to dismiss the charges that he actually bothered to challenge – looks fully prepared to move forward with a high-stakes trial that could literally end his entire career.

In a vivid display of its stubborn determination, the SEC has invested years in a case against Petit based upon suspicions raised by a pair of trades that date all the way back to 2007 and involve a relatively modest windfall that never personally benefited the seasoned executive at all. Still, the SEC highly doubts that his longtime friend simply lucked out by gambling half of his net worth on Matria Healthcare (the company that Petit led at the time) ahead of a generous buyout offer to score an easy $94,000 jackpot as a total novice playing the market for the very first time. Seeking to nail the veteran officer for that suspected leak and prevent him from committing any future offenses, the SEC has proposed a severe punishment that – by stripping Petit of the right to serve as an officer or director of any publicly traded company – threatens to drive the popular MiMedx leader right out of the executive suite.

MiMedx did not respond to requests from TheStreetSweeper seeking input from the company ahead of this story. The stock sure took a curious hit, suddenly falling on a notable surge in trading volume, after TheStreetSweeper alerted the company about the article, though.


Amyris (AMRS): Why These Sweet Dreams Should Keep Investors Up At Night


Tucked within the wide, green hills in eastern Brazil, a little factory churns out a fragrant oil that nourishes the hopes and dreams of Amyris Corp. (AMRS) investors.

One day, the dream goes, people might splash their wrists with perfume made from it. They might slather their faces with it, drive to work on tires made of it and even take off in a jet fueled by this stuff made by engineered bugs – or microbs.

And 6,000 miles to the north, at the Amyris headquarters in Emeryville, Calif., executives churn out reasons for investors to cling to that dream.

So, they pour out creative phrases like “collaboration revenue” and “collaboration inflows” and generally stretch the boundaries of believability as the company tries to maintain its stock price.

TheStreetSweeper is here to cut through the gibberish and explain why we don’t like Amyris.

This company is light on cash, heavy on loans – practically giving itself away to its partners in order to stay afloat. The chief financial officer and three other officers recently fled – a classically bad sign - while the remaining executives are left to try to breathe life into a business plan currently thrashing in its deathbed.

Which brings us to Amyris’ funny numbers and funny wording.


Unilife Corporation: Why this hypodermic needle company keeps jabbing investors

Pre-filled syringe company Unilife (UNIS) is losing millions and management is handing investors a minus 190 percent return on their money.

But its executives are living like kings.

They can thank the CEO’s brand of showmanship that puts P.T. Barnum to shame and likely contributes to the unwarranted share price that’s hovering around $4.60.

And they can also thank their compensation committee with its laugh-out-loud justification for overpaying the folks running a company that can’t seem to turn a dime in profit.

The lowest paid of the bunch is CEO Alan Shortall - the billiard ball-bald Aussie who practiced pitching Unilife to his ex-girlfriend over a decade ago by promising, according to court records, “You will be a rich woman …” after investing in the company.

Last year, Mr. Shortall received more than $690,000, including the $420,000 base salary and almost $45,000 to buy and maintain a vehicle (compared with $6 million including unrealized stock awards the prior year).

Including hefty bonuses and stock, the other four officers last year received about $1 million apiece.

Even more stunning is what UNIS pays its directors.

Altogether, the directors earned a total of just over $2 million in the last two years. For attending a few meetings.

In that period, the unprofitable company generated just over $8 million in revenue.

So the non-employee directors handed themselves about 25 percent of the company’s revenues.

And new retainer fees and other compensation kicked in last December. Each director’s annual retainer fee alone jumped $10,000 to $35,000. All courtesy of the shareholder-approved pay scale created by the three directors on the compensation committee.

The perks for all directors include an extra 1,000 bucks whenever someone has to travel more than two hours to a meeting.

Additionally, each director will receive 35,000 UNIS shares every year for the next three years. In today’s market, that equates to just about $160,000 extra yearly compensation to directors.

Just for attending a few meetings a year.

*How does UNIS explain this level of self-enrichment?

An entertaining piece of prose gently tucked into the SEC filings tells the tale.


TherapeuticsMD (TXMD): Is it really a $1 billion company?

Everybody wanted a piece of TherapeuticsMD (NASDAQ:TXMD).

The little pharmaceutical company attracted investors ranging from a “consultant” whose patience paid off in multiples to an ex-football player with both an MBA and a head lice-treatment company.  

Now, three years later, the company stock is booming even though it’s way too early to know whether the vitamin company can ever pull off plans to launch hormone-based drugs for women.

Can it overcome ties to people with a history of securities problems and fallen companies?

Can it overcome huge losses, daunting litigation, and indistinguishable products?

Can it rise above a series of head-scratching business deals?

And can a reverse merger company selling only $2 million in vitamins really be worth almost $1 billion?


Here’s the key to a daunting near-term risk. Common sense dictates that as soon as the quiet period ends the first week of March, smart insiders will begin selling some of their stock – about 34 million shares – like crazy.

The stock price is howling near record TXMD highs and they’ve got shares to sell, including a truckload of options and warrants that they can exercise for as little as a quarter apiece.

That stash includes roughly 22 million shares in options and warrants just waiting in line to be cashed in.


Miller Energy: Digging Itself into Another Deep Hole?


Miller Energy Resources (Nasdaq: MILL) sure has proven one thing to the world, and it’s not the tremendous value of the discarded oil reserves that the company picked up for next to nothing after more sophisticated players said, “No, thank you,” either. Rather, as a bleeding energy firm buried underneath a mountain of expensive debt – with that weighty burden set to grow even heavier in a matter of weeks – Miller has by now established that, if nothing else, it certainly knows how to dig itself into a dangerous hole.

Take the daunting challenge that Miller will face next month, just for starters. Desperate for cash earlier this year and now on the hook for the promises that it made in order to secure those essential funds, Miller must somehow find a way to come up with $75 million by the end of January in order to avoid loan-shark interest rates (approaching the 20% mark) on every bit of the bank debt that the firm currently owes. For a company with barely $20 million to its name right now – and commitments to cover not only the double-digit interest payments that it already owes to both its lenders and its preferred stockholders but also the $60 million that it just pledged for a major acquisition to boot – Miller can hardly afford for its hairy predicament to grow even worse at this point.


To Chapman Capital Founder Robert Chapmanthe former boss of Miller President/Acting CFO David Voyticky and an obvious skeptic of both the company and its senior management team, Miller barely even resembles a normal energy firm since it focuses so much of its attention on raising capital that it seems to market its stock as its primary product while selling a little bit of oil on the side.

“The gross production numbers are not big – they’re tiny – and the company is still cash-flow negative (from operations combined with necessary capitalized investments), so it has to keep selling this story about its monstrous reserves,” Chapman recently noted during a revealing interview with TheStreetSweeper about the five-month period when he employed Voyticky as a partner at his firm and found the future Miller executive too incompetent (or unwilling) to fulfill the transactional activist, non-investor relations duties required of that post.

“In the meantime, just look at the company!” Chapman declared. “It’s a preferred stock-issuance machine that seems to be more in the business of raising money than making money. And to me, it looks like a stock that's driven by a myth.”

Like other dubious investors, Chapman refuses to buy that story. Indeed, Miller strikes the fund manager as a dangerous company that has placed its trust in an executive that (based upon his own firsthand experience) lacks any substantial skills outside of his ability to raise capital by "smooth-talking investors and lenders into parting with their funds." 

“With Voyticky involved,” Chapman bluntly proclaimed, “I can’t think of many better targets for a short.”

Don't mistake Bristol Capital Advisors as a noble savior just because that "activist" firm suddenly feels driven to overthrow the current leadership due to its alleged incompetence and obvious greed, either. After all, Bristol secured its sizable stake in Miller courtesy of lucrative consulting deals originally awarded – but recently cancelled – by the same boardroom directors that the “outraged” firm now aims to replace with a brand-new slate of its own.

If history serves as any guide, Miller could pay a rather steep price for that intervention should Bristol ultimately succeed.



Opko Health (OPK): TheStreetSweeper stands bullish following Q&A with Dr. Phillip Frost


It’s been a volatile few days for Opko Health (NYSE: OPK)  as bear and bull articles duke it out over the growing company run by billionaire entrepreneur Dr. Phillip Frost. TheStreetSweeper’s gotten a little bruised in the melee (thanks, Anthony Bozza and Lakewood Capital Management!) but we’re back to say we stand by our original report supporting our rare long thesis. We feel the company is poised for further growth under the leadership of Dr. Frost.


TheStreetSweeper respects Mr. Bozza and more often than not has agreed with Lakewood Capital. We’re sure we’ll continue to view most companies in the same light in the future as we examine and expose poor management, accounting games and outright scoundrels infesting public companies. But this time, we simply disagree with Lakewood and the other shorts.


So, we went right to Dr. Frost and executive vice president-administration Steven Rubin to get answers to questions raised by Mr. Bozza. Here is the edited Q&A:


  1. Please tell us about your top two or three products that represent key catalysts, including timeframes and market expectations.  


Dr. Phillip Frost: First is Rolapitant that we licensed out to Tesaro. They announced they expect to have results of the phase 3 trial to report sometime this month possibly. We have no reason to believe it’ll be anything but successful.  


This is an important drug to treat nausea and vomiting associated with chemotherapy. The advantage it has compared to its competitors is a single tablet will suffice to cover the patient for four or five or even six days, whereas the competitors’ have to be taken on several days. Also, it is a highly effective anti-nausea and vomiting drug. And we’re hopeful it will show superiority, particularly with respect to the nausea part of the equation.


That should be coming along. And the company is expecting peak sales of over $1 billion, and our royalties are in the teens. We also get milestone payments of as much as $110 million as things move along. We’re very optimistic about that product.


Second, within the next few months, we’ll be introducing our 4Kscore for prostate cancer. We bought a special laboratory in Nashville, Tenn. to perform the tests. They have been gearing up and … we’re doing the final tests to permit us to use our laboratory to perform the tests for blood samples that will be sent in from far and wide.


The advantage, which will initially be a confirmatory test for a positive PSA (prostate-specific antigen) to try to avoid needless biopsies … The biopsies are expensive. They’re painful. They have side effects of bleeding and infections. So to avoid 60 percent of the biopsies that are now performed would be very important. Ultimately as things go on, because it’s a more precise test, we hope we’ll have the opportunity to perhaps even replace PSA as a screening test, in addition to the confirmatory use for it.


Third … other product is in late phase 3 trials. It’s Rayaldy, the Vitamin D compound for phase 3 and 4 chronic kidney disease. The Vitamin D levels in these patients are difficult to keep at a normal level. Because the Vitamin D levels are low, they tend to make more parathyroid hormone ... which causes demineralization of the bone and hyper-calcemia, which is a problem in that calcium deposits in the kidneys and the vascular system. And that’s often the cause of death in these patients rather than the kidney disease itself.


The problem with currently available, over-the-counter products is they’re not very useful in raising serum Vitamin D levels, particularly in kidney disease patients. And the prescription product have a possibility of causing hypercalcemia.


In order to avoid the hypercalcemia, physicians tend to give lower doses than really required. With our product I think we have the advantage of greater safety with respect to hypercalcemia. Very high efficacy.


 Because the present products sell for as high as $5,000 per year and as low as $3000, with 8 million patients in the US with stage 3 and 4 kidney disease that suffer from low Vitamin D levels as well, the potential market even in the United States alone is quite large - in the billions of dollars. We don’t expect to capture that amount of sales initially. It will take a while, like with any product, to … have it reach its peak levels.


Those are three products that are within sight of coming to market. And we’re quite enthusiastic.


(TheStreetSweeper questions Lakewood Capital Management, which insisted it spoke with “numerous nephrologists” who were skeptical, and then chose to focus on Dr. Jeffrey Giullian, a “veteran nephrologist” to try to dispute Rayaldy's value. He’s such a veteran he began his clinical practice in 2008 or 2009 and has apparently published only three peer-reviewed papers in his whole life. Take a look at his web site, here.  With all due respect to the doctor, one of our physician sources said Dr. Giullian was incorrect in stating (per quotes on pages 4 & 28 of Lakewood’s report) that over-the-counter Vitamin D causes side effects and that Rayaldy is just a bit better than existing OTC treatments.


Also, page 27 of the report states, “The side effect of vitamin D is that it can raise calcium and phosphorous too much, which can become a problem in later stages of CKD (when the kidneys are really struggling). So in more advanced stages of treatment, physicians switch patients to other vitamin D analogs such as Zemplar and Hectorol. These treatments have the beneficial effect of bringing down PTH without bringing up calcium levels.” Our doctor source said it is patently absurd to state that vitamin D analogs are less calcemic than OTC vitamin D.)


  1. Adding those products you discussed, Dr. Frost, what is the potential?


Dr. Phillip Frost: It is in the billions of dollars, without being specific. We don’t have to have $20 billion in sales for all three or even $10 billion, for that matter, for the present stock value to be extremely low … with the possibility of appreciation being very high. That’s the reason I continue to buy shares at most every opportunity I have.


  1. The author of the Lakewood Capital report suggests you are buying a lot of Opko stock in perhaps an attempt to entice investors into also buying. Anything to that?


Dr. Phillip Frost: I can’t keep people from being influenced one way or another. All I know is I invest because I don’t know of another investment I could make that I would be more comfortable with. It’s not part of a marketing strategy. Because if I didn’t believe in it I would be throwing away an awful lot of money. I’m not the type of person who throws away money.


Unilife Corporation (UNIS): Top 10 Reasons

While Unilife Corporation (NasdaqGM:UNIS) is flying, TheStreetSweeper lists the Top 10 reasons we’re bearish and short this over-hyped safety syringe company.


1. Novartis deal does not guarantee an ongoing revenue stream. The UNIS syringes will be used in a clinical trial, requiring few syringes. If Novartis enrolled 500 patients in the trial and injected each monthly using UNIS syringes, UNIS could look forward to only about $5,400 in revenue over a year. No wonder the UNIS press release doesn’t give financial details. It could easily take Novartis 3 to 5 years or more to complete clinical trials and get Food and Drug Administration approval before it would need to order any substantial number of syringes.


2. Even if the Novartis clinical trials pass with flying colors and get FDA approval, the company could easily decide to order syringes instead from safety syringe gorilla Becton Dickinson, controlling an estimated 70 percent of the syringe market. Besides, a whistle-blower lawsuit suggests UNIS lacks the protocol and safety procedures to pull off production of what sounds to be a more complicated syringe for Novartis.


3. Big announcements, bigger disappointments. Investors shouldn’t read into UNIS press releases that upcoming large revenue streams will necessarily occur. The press releases tend to list minimum volume purchases of UNIS syringes. These minimums are only to preserve exclusivity. No one is obligated to buy a certain volume.


4. UNIS CEO Alan Shortall has a goal of about a dozen contracts by year’s end. So far, five have been announced, including the Novartis deal and a Sanofi deal that are re-warmed old contracts. Is the company likely to average almost two contracts a week for the rest of the year? Highly unlikely.


5. Of the announced deals, three involve significant pharmaceutical companies – yet the press releases frequently mention contracts worth $5 million upfront initially plus milestone payments and “expected” revenue and other wishy-washy terms. Before investors hit the “buy” function, they should know what the company’s milestone payments are based on, what the volume production would be and when, plus the length of the ramp-up period. Investors need substance, not hype.



Opko Health (OPK) Street brawl: Doc and multi-billion dollar medical candidates positioned for win

Opko Health (OPK) Street brawl: Doc and multi-billion dollar medical candidates positioned for win

By Sonya Colberg, Senior Investigative Reporter

Opko Health (NYSE: OPK) may be sporting a shiner for now. But in this Street brawl, the big boy in the middle is a billionaire who wears that black eye like a badge of courage, knowing full well that adversity will make his company stronger. Besides, revenge will be so sweet.

Dr. Phillip Frost, the chief executive and chairman of OPK, is seeing a significant short position in his company. That doesn’t ordinarily bother him much, though the short interest is nearly 21 percent of the shares outstanding.

Anthony Bozza of Lakewood Capital (which is reported to suffer a 0.5 percent net loss partially attributed to its short portfolio) bloodied OPK’s nose a bit last week. He compounded the Wall Street drama when he presented his short thesis on the pharmaceutical company Friday during the Robin Hood Conference.

“We’ve always enjoyed a nice big short position,” Dr. Frost told TheStreetSweeper. “I know shorts who lost a lot of money … and later became my friends.”

Dr. Frost counts celebrity stock picker Jim Cramer, star of the “Mad Money” television show, among his many fans. A true believer in both the accomplished doctor and his company, Cramer enthusiastically recommended OPK back when it traded around the $5 range and remained bullish on the name even as the stock rocketed into double-digit territory. While Cramer understands the temptation to start booking those gains, and openly encouraged big winners to take some profits off the table a few days ago, he reiterated his ongoing support of OPK when TheStreetSweeper contacted him about the company over the weekend.

“I like it very much,” Cramer said in an email Sunday evening. “Many ways to win!” 

Dr. Frost knows how to navigate the Food and Drug Administration, and is up on the latest technologies and discoveries in a complicated industry, Jake Dollarhide of Longbow Asset Management said this morning.

“You’ve got to give Dr. Frost a lot of credit for building a healthcare juggernaut,” he said.

“The next few years could certainly be a big opportunity for Opko,” Mr. Dollarhide said. “If those drug trials meet approval and those drugs are a success … we could certainly see the share price of Opko go significantly higher.”

Wall Street is stained by shaky companies overseen by shysters who happily mislead investors and then skulk away dragging bags of dirty money. TheStreetSweeper has exposed many of these fraudulent miscreants, shorted them and, in the process, tried to protect investors from painful losses.

But OPK is the rarest of rare finds for us. We like Dr. Frost. We like Opko Health.  We like Dr. Frost’s assessment of his growing portfolio of sterling products:

“I’ve never been connected to any company with the potential of this one,” said Dr. Frost.


PhotoMedex (PHMD): No!no! doesn't cut it

Would’ve. Could’ve. Definitely should’ve. Those words ring in investors’ ears just after PhotoMedex’s (Nasdaq: PHMD) bungled earnings report. But there’s a lot more to this story as the company faces ongoing challenges.

Here are highlights from issues TheStreetSweeper has exposed about the company whose main product is the no!no! device that removes body hair with a hot wire device:

*Japan’s no!no! revenue no more. Ax falls on potentially $43 million-plus worth of product.

*Flawed stock buyback program. Insiders benefit.

*Food and Drug Administration reportable events, plus a quiet recall. Events include a fire that apparently ignited inside a patient’s throat.

*Lawsuits. With a federal lawsuit loss behind it, additional litigation possibilities loom.

*Reason to sell. Key company product is fading.


PhotoMedex: Just say No!No!


PhotoMedex (NASDAQ:PHMD) is stirring up a cauldron of characters and events that makes this “no!no!” hair-removal device company a hair-raising proposition for investors. 


Characters include Kim Kardashian, the competition’s formerly raven-haired spokeswoman who was sued by PHMD.


And there’s Lewis Pell, board chairman and angel investor whose battered wings reportedly contributed to an initial public offering falling apart. Before he and Shlomo Ben-Haim both wound up at PHMD, he sued Mr. Ben-Haim, his frequent business partner and friend, alleging unfair distribution of assets.


Finally, insider Mr. Ben-Haim is an oft-sued Israeli biotech gentleman billionaire whose enemies once labeled a thug. His rival in one of those various lawsuits is none less than the State of Israel, which alleged he and a partner stole Israel’s technology for freezing cells and entire organs


Here are six key PHMD issues that we believe pose risks for investors:


*Certain insiders dogged by volatile and litigious history, misappropriation guilty plea.


*Key product, already down in the U.S. versus last year, rests on flimsy, weak studies. 


*Study shows key product, no!no! Hair Removal System, works no better than shaving. Further verified by significant consumer rancor.


*Possible class action litigation may be looming.


*We anticipate disappointing earnings ahead.


*Massive insider selling precedes planned $30 million stock buyback.


Now, through the light of a full moon - and TheStreetSweeper’s digging - investors can get a good look at ominous scars that may well damage the company’s future stock price. 


SGMO: A fiery biotech with a product poised to go down in flames?


Sangamo Biosciences (NASDAQ:SGMO) is on fire.


One day it’s supposedly curing AIDS. A couple days later, it’s selling stock.


The Richmond, Calif. company just announced another public offering. That comes just two months after execs bragged about the company being loaded with cash - $66 million - not from selling a product since it has nothing to market, but mostly from research funding.


The offering of 6.1 million shares at $10.58 per share should produce about $65 million for “working capital and other general corporate purposes.” Underwriters may also pick up as many as 915,000 additional shares to cover over-allotment. Now many investors who've watched their $15 IPO shares tumble since 2000 face the prospects of more dilution. 


Meanwhile, a cure for AIDS certainly should be shouted to the moon. 


Judging by its recent presentation of clinical data at a conference in Denver, SGMO ought to be shouting. After all, when it made a measly $1 million acquisition of a riches-to-rags company, SGMO blared out the news in a one hour conference.


But it implies it’s pretty much got the cure for AIDS and that is not important enough for a conference? Just a little, carefully worded press release. Sort of like, “Umm, we can cure AIDS.”




Maybe SGMO folks are a little worried that an outright AIDS-cure announcement would expose their company to more critical questions and analysis. Well, read on.


Though SGMO happily buoys investors’ hopes by exclaiming about its  “spectacular” and “unbelievably powerful” data, the signs say investors should get the red “Failure” stamp ready to go. Our investigation, reinforced by comments from renowned HIV doctor Joseph Sonnabend, suggests it’s time for a splash of cold reality on this company that’s seen its stock roughly double this year to its recent record $11.48


Failure: SGMO’s key product, an HIV “functional cure?” 


SGMO has raised money repeatedly over many years by promoting its zinc finger nuclease (ZFN) gene modification technology, described as “molecular scissors” that cut and replace gene pieces. About 300 biotech companies are working in genetic tinkering. SGMO’s key target is HIV, the virus that causes AIDs.


This is the technology that SGMO has used to entice investors since the mid-1990s. That’s right. For nearly two decades since its inception, the company has done a heap of talking. But it hasn’t moved a single product.


Here’s what SGMO has accomplished:

*It’s held six public offerings now since its IPO. These offerings total about $140 million.

*One of 300 biotech companies working on ways to control genes. Forbes recently highlighted one.

*18 years of promoting an unapproved technology.

*18 years of raking in investors’ money.

*18 years of operating losses, since inception in 1995.

*Still not one marketable product. Nothing’s made it even to phase III clinical trials ... in 18 years.

*Previous attempted product using its technology for a diabetic nerve disorder failed in phase II testing.

*Consistent insider selling, including 47,000 shares sold for over $10, just a couple of buys. The last was in 2010 at about $3.


The evidence, we believe, indicates that SGMO keeps dragging out the same faulty study conclusions as a way to keep the money flowing. TheStreetSweeper would be astounded if SGMO produces a marketable anti-HIV product - ever. 


We submitted trial results and graphs via email to Dr. Sonnabend, renowned HIV researcher and retired HIV clinician. He pioneered community-based research of HIV, co-founded three AIDS organizations and received the Nellie Westerman Prize for Research in Ethics. 


The esteemed doctor was not impressed. He indicated that in all the information sent to him, there’s absolutely nothing to suggest SGMO’s treatment works.


“... I’d say that no meaningful evidence was presented to indicate that their treatment has antiviral activity,” said Dr. Sonnabend.


Zenyatta: Selling a Story with More Holes Than Its Celebrated Mine

CORRECTION: TheStreetSweeper has elected to remove the second story in this series after discovering on Friday morning that the CEO of Zenyatta actually worked with a different Don Sheldon than the promoter identified in the article. While TheStreetSweeper continues to stand by the other revelations included in that report, including the doubts expressed by notable industry experts about the validity of the story that the company itself has told, we have nevertheless chosen to withdraw the entire article to address the situation and compensate for this accidental oversight. We regret this error and apologize for any confusion that it might have caused.

Give Zenyatta Ventures (TSXV:ZEN.V; OTC: ZENYF) credit for this much. While that highflying junior miner has yet to deliver the most preliminary report that investors need to even begin judging the value of its celebrated graphite deposit, let alone produce any concrete evidence that its graphite rivals the best in the world, the company has managed to establish one thing for sure. As a standout performer in a crowd of junior miners that have tanked along with the underlying price of graphite – and now sports a hefty $175 million market capitalization that eclipses the market values assigned to a number of its more advanced rivals combined – Zenyatta has clearly proven that, if nothing else, the company knows how to sell a tantalizing story.

Granted, by the time that Zenyatta CEO Aubrey Eveleigh launched the company as a junior miner originally scouting for overlooked copper and nickel deposits, he had already mastered a similar pitch while steering the exploration program for another Canadian junior that obediently responded with some rather amazing – if fleeting – gains of its own. Like Zenyatta itself, MetalCorp (TSXV: MTC.V; OTC:MTLCF) looked hopelessly stuck in penny-stock land until the obscure resource player suddenly exploded to record highs after the company reported that it had basically stumbled upon a valuable discovery by complete accident. Indeed, with Eveleigh routinely surfacing as the official voice of that doomed company, MetalCorp literally spent years trumpeting a series of “lucky breaks” that kept hope alive (and the bleeding miner afloat) long enough to deplete most of its funds and finally prompt the board to kick the future chief of Zenyatta out of its own executive suite.

Four years after MetalCorp severed its ties with Eveleigh -- later credited for raising the mountain of cash that the battered miner spent -- the company now sports a total market of value of less than $1 million and trades for a mere penny a share

While initially forced to settle for a similar post at an obscure miner that looked similarly worthless, Eveleigh soon negotiated a handy deal that would allow him to overcome the fresh stain on his record (since erased with the helpful passage of time) and provide him with the material to produce his recent encore. After securing minority rights to some remote mining claims through a consulting firm that he owns – terminated by wrecked MetalCorp, along with the executive himself, earlier that same year – Eveleigh orchestrated a lucrative related-party deal that supplied that discarded asset to a “numbered” company that could then go public with that swampy land as its flagship property and the disgraced executive in charge of the entire show.

When Zenyatta filed the official paperwork for its stock offereing the following year, of course, the company dutifully portrayed Eveleigh as a successful corporate executive with an impressive background in geology and a proven track record in the mining field. Notably, however, Zenyatta also referred to Eveleigh as an outright “promoter” throughout its prospectus and further underscored that disturbing role in a so-called “certificate of the promoter – signed by the CEO himself – at the end of that crucial document.

To be sure, with Eveleigh overseeing its business and handling its publicity, Zenyatta has followed a rather familiar path on its amazing journey to record-breaking highs. After debuting as just another obscure miner and languishing in penny-stock territory for a couple of years -- providing early investors with little incentive to exercise pricier warrants that would inject millions into its bank account -- Zenyatta suddenly rushed to capitalize on its own accidental discovery of a particularly hot resource that had spiked in price to generate plenty of helpful buzz. With the company trumpeting its graphite deposit as both extraordinarily rare and extremely valuablewhile forecasting massive production rates of top-quality graphite that commands a steep premium, Zenyatta finally began to gather steam about a year ago and soon blew right past the former hotshots in its peer group to emerge with the most breathtaking gains in that fading sector by far.  

A stock that fetched as little as 15 cents a share last summer, threatening to render a mountain of $1 warrants effectively worthless by the end of the year, Zenyatta has since rocketed all the way to a record high of $5 a share and continues to trade near the top of that gigantic range. Indeed, even after shedding 25% of its peak value since late July, Zenyatta still commands more than an entire group of noteworthy competitors – with both its stock and its overall market cap exceeding those of Northern Graphite (TSVX: NGC.V; OTC: NGPHF), Focus Graphite (TSVX: FMS.V; (OTC:FSCMF), Big North Graphite (TSVX: NRT.V; OTC: BNCIF) and Alabama Graphite (CN: ALP.CN; OTC: ABGPF) combined – despite the head-starts that position those miners to enter the market long before their pricier rival ever gets its own chance.

Since Zenyatta has never presented any documented evidence to validate its claims about either the abundance or the quality of its graphite deposits – and still needs to provide the first in a series of formal reviews that will likely take years to complete – the company strikes some of the most prominent veterans in the industry as a worthless promotion at worst and the riskiest name in the group at the absolute best.

“Zenyatta hasn’t done one thing to prove that they have material that can be used in the applications that they claim,” declared Asbury Carbons CEO Stephen Riddlethe fourth-generation leader of a company that has operated in the graphite space for more than a century. “Whenever it comes out that whatever they promoted isn’t going to work, the stock will collapse … Personally, I think that they’re going to put a big black eye on the entire industry.”



The ExOne Company: Irrational exuberance obscures black clouds building around 3-D printing

The ExOne Company’s (NASDAQ: XONE) surprise stock offering last week irritated investors. 

The 3-D printer maker is diluting investors‘ shares to raise millions just six months after its public offering. 


But the company has buried reasons for even more irritation deep within the S1registration papers it filed after the bell Aug. 21.  


The chief executive and his interests get far more money under this deal than the company itself.


It’s roughly $100 million for him versus $72 million for the company. That’s 1.55 million shares and 1.1 million shares respectively at the $65 per share listed in the filing. The registration papers specify the shares will be offered by the company and by “selling stockholders.” A dig through the gibberish reveals those “selling stockholders” are actually CEO Kent Rockwell - through his two entities and trust.


Funny timing on that trust. Exactly one day before the registration announcement, Mr. Rockwell, through an entity, boldly gave his trust 450,000 shares worth about $30 million.  


The stock reached $70 on the day he gave away the shares. As is common, share prices dropped right after the company announced the offering, falling for a time below $65.


And there’s more to this deal. Mr. Rockwell himself ultimately stands to benefit yearly from his charitable deed.


The “remainder trust” benefits Lafayette College, Rockwell’s alma mater. It requires Lafayette to pay Rockwell’s entity 5 percent of the trust’s assets each year for 10 years (likely over $1 million the first year). Whatever’s left over after a decade goes to Lafayette.


Once approved, the stock offering could also include up to 398,400 additional shares held by Rockwell’s entities, President David Burns (whose total 2012 compensation exceeded $3.5 million), Chief Financial Officer John Irvin (whose compensation exceeded $1.8 million) and two other execs. These are over-allotment shares exercisable within 30 days of the offering if the public demand is high enough. 


The other millions of shares are locked up for 90 days or the end of November. 


Yet another lockup release date hits just around the corner in early September. One minute before midnight on Friday, Aug. 30 is when the 180-day post initial public offering lockup expires, potentially unleashing more than 7 million shares onto the market. The lockup release initially set for Aug. 5 was delayed until after the company reported its 2Q earnings in mid-August.


At nosebleed valuations, the company and Mr. Rockwell are likely to sell far more stock than if the valuation had been depressed. 



Personal piggy bank


XONE reported proceeds of about $92 million from the initial public offering in February. But about $16.6 million of this went into Mr. Rockwell’s pockets through his entities for things such as land payments, and repayment of loans and one entity’s entire debt. He also sold more than $10.2 million of stock in the IPO. 


After subtracting costs such as offering expenses, our figures show XONE realized IPO proceeds of about $63.3 million. 


The initial public offering made Mr. Rockwell about $26.8 million richer.


Indeed, Mr. Rockwell seems to be having a lot of success in making XONE his own personal piggy bank. The two offerings potentially could make him $97 million to $127 million wealthier.


Mr. Rockwell’s ownership has gone from 71.1 percent pre-IPO to about 22-23 percent or over 3 million shares, according to the filing. They’re worth somewhere around $198 million. Yet he’s apparently not afraid to pinch pennies - he charges XONE hundreds of thousands of dollars for the use of his entity’s airplane and services.


TearLab: Blind Faith in a Risky Highflier with Forgotten Tear Stains


TearLab (Nasdaq: TEAR) might feel like crying if it contacted some of the doctors listed on its own website as providers of its diagnostic test for dry eye disease and listened to the feedback from those who no longer use its glorified machine.

Take Dr. Seaborn Hunt, for example. A Florida ophthalmologist, Dr. Hunt practices medicine in a popular retirement town crowded with seniors who qualify for coverage of the $50 TearLab test under the government-funded Medicare program. While TearLab specifically identifies his clinic as one of three local practices that utilize its device – generally provided by the company, free of charge, in exchange for a commitment to purchase a steady supply of the disposable cards that its system requires – Dr. Hunt has already returned his own machine and gladly resumed his use of an old-fashioned diagnostic test for DED instead.

“It was just a pain,” one of his employees bluntly explained. “We sent it back because we found it to be inaccurate.

“I know that a lot of people are advertising it. But if you have (DED), you have it. You don’t need a machine to tell you that.”

In neighboring Alabama, yet another ophthalmologist on that list must have reached a similar conclusion. Identified by TearLab as one of only four eye doctors who offer its test in the city of Birmingham, the largest metropolitan area in the entire stateDr. Michael A. Callahan recently pulled the plug on that medical device – portrayed as an outright “lemon” by a member of his staff – and shipped the machine back to the company, too.

“I saw them boxing up this machine yesterday,” the receptionist volunteered when contacted by TheStreetSweeper a couple of weeks ago. “And sure enough, that was it! They sent it back; they found that it was not all that it was supposed to be.”

For its part, TearLab promotes its namesake device as a tremendous breakthrough so revolutionary that eye doctors will likely adopt the test as a new “standard of care” by screening their patients for DED as a matter of routine. While TearLab acknowledged that it has fielded a “small number of device returns” from doctors who effectively bailed on their multi-year contracts, when specifically questioned by TheStreetSweeper ahead of this story, the company pointed to low reimbursement from private insurers in certain areas – never hinting at any dissatisfaction with the machine itself – as the primary reason.

Regardless, TearLab has definitely sold Wall Street on its sexy story. After all, based on virtually any normal measurement tool, TearLab arguably should remain stuck (where it languished for years) deep in single-digit territory. All told, TearLab mustered less than $4 million in revenue last year -- easily dwarfed by the $12 million operating loss that it endured while pursuing that business – and recently closed the books on a “blockbuster” quarter by generating a modest $3.5 million in sales (likely eclipsed by yet another sizable loss) even after a powerful growth spurt.

A neglected $3 stock just one year ago, TearLab has nevertheless rocketed all the way past $14 a share since that time to achieve a lofty market valuation of $410 million – a staggering 70 times its prior-year sales – with the help of bullish calls from conflicted analysts who keep on urging investors to buy the pricey stock in spite of its nosebleed multiples.


Coronado Biosciences (NASDAQ: CNDO): A master puppeteer’s folly?


Coronado Biosciences (NASDAQ: CNDO) is tangled amid a bizarre whipworm therapeutic candidate, jail birds, cozy relationships, crazy financing, decimated companies controlled by a master puppeteer - and just now a brand new $200 million shelf registration.  


And it’s all precisely timed. The company is rolling out public stock offerings - and filed the new S-3 that will further dilute the stock with millions upon millions of additional shares - just before clinical trial results are released. 


Is this because CNDO suspects its key candidate - live pig whipworm eggs - won’t work? Does the company suspect that it will never even reach phase III?


Despite several negative study results, CNDO is testing its pig whipworm eggs to treat auto-immune diseases, a medical area populated by fierce pharma companies with deep pockets. 


Independent investigators recently conducted trials based on batches of 2,500 parasitic eggs, culled from pig manure, that hatched out in patients’ guts. The parasitic egg cocktails caused three to 19 times more incidences of pain and other severe side effects - typically lasting for weeks - than in patients on a placebo. 


In fact, the results were so bad that over a dozen patients stopped gulping down their worm egg drinks before the study ended.


Similar risks turned up in three separate studies - all apparently ignored by Burlington, Mass-based CNDO. And even though independent study authors urged fewer eggs per dose in future testing, some patients will slurp down three times more - 7,500 worm eggs - in each dose every two weeks, under a new study that CNDO is resolutely conducting. 


Set up for dilution


Despite the negatives, the stock more than tripled over the last year to reach an all-time high of $12.70 on April 23. 


Days later, CNDO filed an ongoing at-the-market offering on April 29 to sell $45 million worth of stock at the company’s whim. 


Was that enough? No. According to the newest S-3, the company amended the ATM offering so it could sell up to $70 million worth of stock.


And was that enough? No, still not enough. This bleeding company with a highly debatable product in fact quietly filed this new shelf registration after market close July 12. Once effective, CNDO will be able to distribute $200 million worth of stock or warrants from time to time over three years, as determined by market conditions. This represents tremendous dilution and overhang for a company with a market cap of about $234 million.




Revolution Lighting Technologies (NASDAQ:RVLT): A wild ride destined to leave investors in a heap?


A wild, sudden interest in its boring business has Revolution Lighting Technologies (NASDAQ:RVLT) soaring. Shares have more than doubled over the past three months, pushing the stock into the Russell 3000


Rather impressive for a company that was pretty much left for dead late last year. Then Robert LaPenta, a high-roller known for both his horse sense and business sense,  rode in with multi-millions of dollars to toss RVLT’s way in exchange for multi-millions of shares of stock in the light bulb company. After his financial entities’ first $6 million infusion last September, LaPenta propped up the struggling company again and again over the following months until the influx totaled $21 million.


But TheStreetSweeper believes Mr. LaPenta is beating a dead horse. RVLT just closed at nearly $4, but compared to its peers the stock should trade for about 7 cents to 20 cents per share. Even Mr. LaPenta’s entities paid what seems like a fair price of 13 cents to $1.17.  


The reasons behind our position include:


*Big cash burn: dilution looks imminent.

*Based on the market cap of $305.7 million as of Friday’s close, sales are ridiculously puny.

*Most revenue depends on a recent over-priced acquisition that struggled with declining sales and no profits.

*Questionable ability to generate recurring revenues.

*Insider buying may be just a cheap way to promote the stock. 


The company is still traveling through rough terrain, according to investment advisor Jake Dollarhide, CEO of Longbow Asset Management.


KEYW: Infecting Investors with a False Sense of Security?

* Editor's Note: The following story is the second installment in a detailed investigative report on KEYW. Simply click here for immediate access to the earlier article.

The more cash that KEYW (Nasdaq: KEYWblows on acquisitions to pursue its capital-intensive growth strategy – without unlocking the fabulous potential that management sure liked to trumpet whenever it tried to justify those expensive deals – the more the bleeding rollup company seems to conveniently relax its standards for success.

Go back and look at the compelling story that KEYW presented to the press a couple of years ago, when it first arrived on the scene as a young public company bursting with fresh promise, and compare the glorious visions that management shared back then with the stark results that the swaggering upstart actually went on to deliver instead. In a bold (if misplaced) show of confidence ahead of an embarrassing setback, KEYW predicted that it would capitalize on its relentless shopping spree by not only enhancing its role as a prime contractor on big-budget government projects but also by maximizing the future performance of all the obscure firms that it kept on swallowing – casually boasting that “30 percent organic growth is achievable” right off the bat – once it fully digested those acquisitions into its own system and transformed them into a fresh layer of muscle.

Eager to showcase its early progress a few months after debuting on the Nasdaq exchangeKEYW bragged that it already generated two-thirds of its revenue from coveted prime contracts and practically assumed that its share of that high-margin business would further expand along with its escalating size. Unable to land a prominent $700 million government contract or even maintain some of the lucrative projects that it already supervised, however, KEYW wound up playing a secondary role on so many of the accounts that it inherited – with prime contracts accounting for barely one-quarter of its revenue by 2012 – that the company emerged from its costly shopping binge looking more like a lowly subcontractor than ever.

Since KEYW has largely manufactured its top-line growth by simply purchasing other firms and then booking their revenue as its own, the ravenous defense contractor still looks like a typical rollup company, too. To be sure, KEYW has yet to approach the impressive levels of organic growth that management supposedly regarded as “achievable” back when its young stock staged its first remarkable (if temporary) rally. Even based on the generous formula that KEYW prefers to calculate its organic growth – selectively including any new business that it has added while conveniently excluding any prior business that it has lost – the company has fallen well short of the incredible productivity gains that it originally promised and, two years later, now seem hopelessly beyond its reach.



KEYW: Drunk on Hype and Doomed to Sing the Blues?


As a fanatical “ParrotHead” with an encyclopedic knowledge of Jimmy Buffett songs, KEYW (Nasdaq: KEYW) Chief Executive Officer Leonard Moodispaw often seems more inclined to share catchy lyrics penned by his idol than useful details about the actual business conducted by his glorified rollup company. While Moodispaw likes to present snippets from those upbeat tunes as metaphors for noteworthy developments at his tightlipped cyber-security firm, however, he has somehow managed to overlook the very title that perhaps delivers the most fitting message of all: “Math Suks.”

No matter how well Moodispaw might spin its record or how much he tries to promote its next big hit, KEYW remains a bleeding defense contractor that has spent a fortune on acquisitions and – now down to its last $3 million and already burdened by plenty of debt (with limited available credit left) – still needs to prove itself.

Practically broke after raising almost $100 million through a dilutive secondary offering last fall, the war chest supplied by its initial public offering two years earlier basically gone, KEYW traveled all the way to Europe last week in an effort to strike up fresh interest in the company by hosting an apparent road show for investors halfway around the globe. A somewhat rare courtesy that largely escaped the attention of investors back home, left puzzled (but understandably pleased) by the energetic gains that KEYW recorded once that distant road show began, the move nevertheless struck some of the more cynical followers of the company as an obvious – if desperate – reach by the bleeding firm for additional funds.   

While KEYW never bothered to openly publicize that important event on its official schedule, let alone divulge the actual intentions behind it, a corporate cheerleader helpfully volunteered that enlightening update from Europe himself. A former analyst who spent the end of his Wall Street career stubbornly clinging to his relentless faith in Force Protection, one of the more notorious flameouts that stained his record, KEYW Vice President of Corporate Development Chris Donaghey originally originally fell in love with the first rollup company that Moodispaw built before joining him in the executive suite at the next.

Focused since then on promoting KEYW alone, Donaghey surprised even TheStreetSweeper with news of the foreign road show when it contacted him on Tuesday seeking input from the company ahead of this story. Tied up with potential investors at the time, Donaghey promised to address probing questions from TheStreetSweeper – seeking detailed information to supplement the vague and/or opaque material that the stingy company normally chooses to share – by early this week for inclusion in follow-up stories. (Since KEYW emailed its somewhat vague responses to the questions that it chose to answer right as the market opened today, beyond the deadline that would have allowed reasonable time for their full incorporation into this story, TheStreetSweeper will simply provide a link to the the information supplied by the company at the present time.) 

The first in a series of articles on the incredibly secretive cyber-security firm (with the second currently scheduled to follow in a matter of days), this broad introduction challenges the rosy image that KEYW has long enjoyed by presenting thorny evidence that pokes holes in the compelling story often sold to trusting investors as the absolute gospel. By combing through voluminous piles of regulatory filings and comprehensive databases full of revealing media coverage, TheStreetSweeper has gathered enough disturbing material to shatter some of the most powerful illusions that surround the company and in turn undermine some of the most critical arguments that favor its stock. As the opening installment in that series, this story serves as a general overview that summarizes overlooked contradictions to popular myths about the company, with the most relevant of those – related to its business strategy, its leadership team and its track record – detailed more extensively in the remaining sections of the report.



Lot78 (LOTE): A Glorified Fad Headed for the Discount Bin?


As an overhyped microcap name touted by dubious stock promoters, Lot78 (OTC: LOTE) sure looks like a fashion stock that will soon go out of style. After rocketing all the way from $1 to $9 a share in recent weeks – an inexplicable spike that has left the bleeding retailer with a bloated $500 million market value that now exceeds 1,000 times its prior-year sales – LOTE bears an awfully close resemblance to another hot fashion pick that wound up with the shelf life of a momentary fad.

Forget about all of the warnings that LOTE has included in its official regulatory filings for a moment: the modest sales, totaling less than $500,000 annually, that actually declined last year; the relentless losses and lack of cash that drove the company to borrow $40,000 from its founder just to stay afloat; the onerous debt, owed to its major shareholder, that literally exceeds the dwindling sales mustered by the company over the course of the past year; the doubt expressed by its independent auditor over its very chances of survival; even the insolvent status of the company reflected by the imbalance between the meager assets and the far larger liabilities recorded on its books.

In fact, go ahead and forget about the reverse merger that magically transformed the company from a defunct energy firm into a highflying retailer – using a vehicle long associated with “pump-and-dump” schemes – that has somehow exploded to reach double-digit prices rarely achieved (let alone maintained) on the lowly penny-stock exchange. Granted, under the terms of that reverse merger, the original owners of the empty shell wound up holding almost half of the stock that now trades under the LOTE symbol and now stand to make a tremendous fortune by unloading those expensive shares with the stock in overdrive. Of course, now that LOTE has mysteriously surfaced on a foreign stock exchange that’s particularly vulnerable to manipulation, those lucky investors could further boost their outsized gains by actually selling some of that overvalued stock short – effectively betting on its decline -- and hitting a nice jackpot on any future collapse.

Overlook the fact that the founder’s citizenship makes it virtually impossible for poor, disgruntled shareholders to seek justice, should the need arise. Indeed, filings state:

"Our sole officer and director, Mr. Oliver Amhurst, is a resident of Great Britain. As a result, it may be difficult or impossible for our investors to effect service of process within the United States upon him, to bring suit against him in the United States or to enforce in the United States courts any judgment obtained there against him predicated upon any civil liability provisions of the United States federal securities laws."

Forget that, anyway. Simply focus on the glossy newsletter mailed to thousands of potential investors – courtesy of a massive publicity campaign with a $2.5 million budget that actually exceeds the total sales achieved by LOTE to date – instead.


Lululemon: Sheer lunacy


Lululemon Athletica’s pants fiasco is just getting worse, forcing the yoga gear company into a futile battle that we believe will persist and lead to missed earnings.


Lululemon (NYSE:LULU) CEO Christine Day stated that the company’s recent recall of too-sheer pants was limited: “So it’s just the black pant in particular.”


The pants debacle cost LULU an estimated $75 million -$86 million expected to cut earnings per share by 11 cents to 12 cents. But now, the company has pulled more garments and even more recalls could be ahead.

Last Friday, the company pulled clothing made of its candy-striped Luon fabric but did so quietly, notifying only a minority of customers who happened to catch the recall mention on LULU’s Facebook page. This comes almost a month after the initial recall of the core black Luon women’s pants. TheStreetSweeper wanted to ask LULU why the candy-striped bottoms were no longer listed on its website this week but LULU declined an interview.


Even more clothes may need to be recalled because the sheerness problem would be as bad or worse than the black Luon garments because of the characteristics of the fabric, according to a source with 29 years of experience, including many years with a key competitor. 

Photographs show some colored pants offer little more coverage than panty hose.

The company, meanwhile, is striding forward in its tried-and-true fashion of not discounting, Day also assured analysts during the March 21 conference call. 

Here’s what she said:

“We achieved these results in a very brand-appropriate way, and did not buy our comps through discounting, which ultimately would have harmed the brand. We maintained a full price strategy up to the holidays, then used our traditional warehouse sales as an effective and low-risk way to clear our inventory.” (italics added)

Just one week after she made that statement, the company quietly held a massive weekend sale.

LULU customers in New York, Dallas, Los Angeles and other cities sorted through racks loaded - and often reloaded - with numerous garments over three days. These were not just last season’s styles and colors but also new styles, according to our checks of more than 20 stores. In one case, the sale was so secretive that an irate customer said that, the day before the sale began in a New York City store, an assistant manager left a message on her phone saying there would be no sale. 

 The sales - which clerks or educators typically referred to as “markdowns,” (one former clerk says the word “sale” was strictly forbidden) - are common and continuing. Indeed, significant markdowns were offered in many stores we checked on again last weekend. 

Educators in Las Vegas and Seattle stores said that customers can always find a rack or two of new and older styles marked down. In fact, the sales are directed by corporate headquarters, as a Vegas educator said that, while the store can exercise autonomy, it also gets weekly calls from corporate to learn which items to mark down.

Photos showing recent sales racks in stores across the country, along with discounted inventory and price tags are here,  set2set3set4set5set6set7 set8set9.set10, or set11

LULU’s strategy of scarcity is the coveted key to keeping customers running to its stores to buy yoga gear on the spot at full price. This is not just something she alluded to in the March 21 conference call. Day has made it obvious time and again that brand-harming discounting is not the LULU way.

“Our guest knows that there’s a limited supply, and it creates these fanatical shoppers,” Day told The Wall Street Journal last year.

And in an interview on CNBC in January, Day reiterated LULU’s disdain of  promotions: “You’re either going to play in that game of discount or you’re not. And we’re in the ‘not’ category,” Day said.


Bio-Reference: The Chilling Results of a Lie-Detector Test


Talk about a company that knows how to test the limits of credibility. By now, Bio-Reference Laboratories (Nasdaq: BRLI) has contradicted itself so many times that its own statements establish the company as blatantly deceitful at worst and dangerously unreliable at the absolute best. As illustrated by the string of conflicting viewpoints and glaring reversals that follow, most of them directly attributable to the company itself, Bio-Reference might face more than a few challenges if it dared an attempt at passing a lie-detector test.


* Bio-Reference claim: “The company has no knowledge of any government subpoenas about its billing practices.” (Source: email from Bio-Reference to TheStreetSweeper on Feb. 25, 2013)

* Contradictory evidence: “The company has, from time to time, received subpoenas from state agencies and from the Office of the Inspector General of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services seeking documents relating to the company’s billing-related activities.” (Source: brand-new disclosure in Bio-Reference 10-K report for the 2012 fiscal year filed by the company – and certified by its CEO and CFO as reliable – on Jan. 14, 2013)


* Bio-Reference claim: “Let me just go emphasize. In women’s health, we make these tests available. The doctors order these tests. They order the Pap smears. They will order whatever molecular test that they want. We don’t do that … We may monitor what they do and make sure, if we can, they don’t over-test … But these doctors choose it.” (Source: Bio-Reference CEO Marc Grodman downplaying the potential for excessive use of high-end specialty tests sold by its GenPath subsidiary during a quarterly conference call on May 26, 2011)

* Contradictory evidence: “$300 visit + $845 lab bill for an annual checkup. Lab is called GenPath, and they conducted fraud on my insurance and me by charging for some kind of tests that were never ordered. Seaside staff member said: ‘I think the lab is regularly overcharging patients like this and, when they charge the insurance, they don’t return anything.’ ??? After several aggravated calls to Seaside, they finally persuaded the lab to waive the out-of-pocket fees, but are still keeping what they’ve stolen from my insurance. This is wrong on many levels and could happen to you.” (Source: an online review posted in December of 2012 by Diana Konrad, a San Diego photographer who underwent a routine Pap smear only to later discover that GenPath had billed her Blue Cross/Blue Shield plan for a far more elaborate test – without prior authorization from her physician – and allegedly pulled the same trick with others on a regular basis)


* Bio-Reference claim: “The change in the BlueCard … is a complex issue which, for the most part, only became effective as of January 1, 2013. At this time, the company believes it is too early to ascertain potential impacts on its business.” (Source: email from Bio-Reference to TheStreetSweeper on Feb. 25, 2013)

* Bio-Reference claim: “Based on our current experience with billing, we believe the change in the BlueCard program will not have a material effect on our business this year … I think it’s creating a lot of confusion, (but) we’re comfortable in being able to say that, overall, the impact is not going to be significant for us.” (Source: conference call hosted by the company to review its first-quarter results and full-year outlook on Feb. 28, 2013)

* Contradictory evidence: “Something else is occurring now that could be very difficult for some of us in independent laboratories. (Soon), the easier access that BlueCard afforded the patient will be gone … If we’re shut out of the game before that change evolves, then we won’t be able to compete … Think of it this way: The Blues will be able to do what the FDA could not do to stop innovation and new testing, because you simply will have no ability – no way, no mechanism – to bill, except to have the patient pay for it out of his or her own pocket.” (Source: speech given by Bio-Reference CEO Marc Grodman to fellow lab executives in May of 2012 ahead of the nationwide BlueCard change)

* Contradictory evidence: “Some labs are seeing as much as an 85% drop in Blue Cross payments. This is going to cause regional laboratories a big financial hardship … It’s something that we’re struggling with tremendously.” (Source: fallout from the BlueCard change witnessed by Alice Carroll, president of Revenue Cycle Consultant, a firm specifically hired by labs to help enhance their billing systems and bolster their collection rates)


Bio-Reference (BRLI): Overdue for a Dose of Shock Therapy?

Don’t be surprised if Bio-Reference Laboratories (Nasdaq: BRLI) finds itself stuck with so many rejected claims that, after years of relentlessly pushing expensive specialty tests, the company finally starts to look like a victim of its own success.

Take the flood of denials that Bio-Reference can expect from the most dominant health insurer in the entire country. While far from the only setback that Bio-Reference has encountered -- with a whistleblower reporting government scrutiny of its past billing practices, for example, and multiple insurers disputing its claims for tests on suspected con artists – this one potentially represents the most immediate threat.



Last fall, two weeks before Bio-Reference opened its books on the quarter that it will review tomorrow, the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association closed a major loophole in its flexible BlueCard program that stripped regional labs of their former access to BCBS plans outside their own borders. Ever since BCBS enacted that nationwide policy, records indicate, Bio-Reference has effectively operated as an out-of-network provider – subject to copayments, deductibles and routine denials – in every state except for the handful where the company actually holds contracts with local BCBS plans. As a regional laboratory that generates 60% of its revenue from lucrative “esoteric” tests that it markets all over the countrywhere one-third of the population relies on BCBS for health benefits, Bio-Reference could theoretically lose 20% of its business due to this overlooked measure alone.

“Some labs are seeing as much as an 85% drop in Blue Cross payments,” said Alice Carroll, president of Revenue Cycle Consultant, a firm specifically hired by labs to help enhance their billing systems and bolster their collection rates. “This is going to cause regional laboratories a big financial hardship … It’s something that we’re struggling with tremendously.”

Just ask the labs themselves. Fearing outright ruin, several regional laboratories have already raced to sue BCBS in a desperate attempt to reverse the BlueCard policy and escape the massive fallout that they otherwise expect. Their own panic devastatingly obvious, the plaintiffs warn of widespread casualties throughout the industry -- with “even the most distinguished reference labs” weathering painful blows, “hundreds of molecular and specialty labs” failing altogether and “the entire molecular industry” soon vanishing for good.

No wonder Bio-Reference started acting like some frantic last-minute shopper over the recent holiday season. Just weeks after Bio-Reference boldly predicted yet another blockbuster year, forecasting a 15% surge in revenue despite a potential dive in BCBS payments that could erase those projected gains, the company suddenly took a radical detour from its regular strategy by splurging on a couple of obscure labs far away from its Northeastern base. During a rare shopping trip that caught little (if any) attention from analysts distracted by the festive holidays, Bio-Reference blew almost $9 million – roughly one-third of the cash in its bank account – on a pair of labs down in Florida and specifically cited their local BCBS contracts as a primary reason.

Since Bio-Reference never even bothered to mention the pesky BlueCard change to its investors, long accustomed to blowout financial results, the company better hope that it can somehow land enough extra business in Florida to offset the potential losses that it faces in elsewhere throughout the country.



Blowing the Whistle on Cyberonics


(Editor's Note: TheStreetSweeper is pleased to introduce a brand-new investigative report by Infitialis under a special arrangement that gives our own readers the chance to see this groundbreaking research first. We welcome this opportunity.)

We are Infitialis, a research collective that systematically exposes fraud and folly in financial markets. Since August 2012, we have published 10 meticulously researched exposés on companies that we believed had engaged in unscrupulous behavior or exhibited unsustainable market valuations. Below you will find our track record disclosing each of our exposes, the date of publication and the subsequent price action following the publication of our research.  




Price on Date

Subsequent Low

% Decline  








Suspended by SEC




































Pink Sheet












Pink Sheet






Each and every one of our reports has contributed to a profit with an average decline of 71% from the time of publication. Today, we present our highest conviction exposé yet highlighting folly in the form of a significant valuation bubble.  More importantly, we present -- with the help of a whistleblower -- very serious allegations of unscrupulous and potentially fraudulent activity on the part of NASDAQ-listed Cyberonics, Inc.  (NASDAQ: CYBX). These detailed allegations have been documented in an amended complaint filed by the whistleblower in Massachusetts Federal Court  just a week ago on January 16, 2013.  

This is the first time these allegations and this lawsuit are being disclosed to the investing public, as the company failed to do so even as the original complaint was filed on August 8, 2012 -- well within the disclosure period of the last 10Q. 

CYBX: Our Highest Conviction and Most Asymmetric Expose Yet

In this report, we present the culmination of nearly two months of research into Cyberonics, Inc. which resulted in our belief that the Company will never grow into its current $1.5 billion valuation in the bull case and may decline by 80% in the bear case should any of the allegations in the whistleblower suit be proven in federal court.

We will start by objectively reviewing the science behind the CYBX device in an effort to understand whether the device actually works or is simply being marketed by the Company as the end-all treatment for various medical conditions. 

Next, we will provide an analysis on the effectiveness of the treatment for depression (a new frontier the company has been touting for years). This analysis is important, as the analyst community is currently relying on growth in the depression market to rationalize a mathematically irreconcilable share valuation. 

Finally, we will unveil the very serious whistleblower allegations which we believe reveal the missing piece in the puzzle of the CYBX business model: Cyberonics management team incentivizes its sales organization to engage in unscrupulous and potentially deadly behavior all in an effort to juice its top-line revenue, while insiders sell unprecedented amounts of stock into the market.  

We will end the report with three valuation assumptions for CYBX -- bull, base and bear -- that incorporate all the qualitative and quantitative data in this report. 


PSS World Medical: Prognosis Undetermined

PSS World Medical (NASDAQ: PSSI) is a shopaholic with more than 100 acquired companies under its belt and a recurring need to reinvent itself to try to keep up with the competition.

The distributor of bed pans, medicine and similar items is lugging around heavy debt - and the torment of posting its lowest net income in 25 straight quarters. 

A forensic accountant who reviewed some of the Jacksonville, Fla.-based company's documents also pointed out some scars in its finances.

"It wouldn't surprise me if the company was trying to hide something," said Keith Mautner, a San Diego, Calif.-based forensic accountant.

"They're doing things companies that engage in fraud also do, but that doesn't necessarily mean they are engaging in fraud themselves," Mautner added.

PSSI, market cap $1.1 billion, distributes medical products primarily to doctors' offices, but also long-term care and assisted living facilities, and home health-care and hospice providers. 

PSSI management did not return telephone calls requesting an interview with TheStreetSweeper.

Some PSSI issues that deserve closer examination:

* Falling profits; history of missed estimates 

* Failed buy-out shears shareholders, fires up concerns

* Heavy debt

* Restructuring bothers analysts

* Some analysts downgrade

* Losing out to big competitors

* Inadequate hospital distribution 

* Insiders selling


Falling Net Income and Long History of Missed Estimates 

It's been a long, long time - 25 quarters - since PSSI has reported such dismal net income. The company's income fell to $10.7 million this past quarter. That profit - damaged by increased general and selling expenses, plus new acquisitions - compares with about $20 million in each of the previous three quarters.

Investors have to look way back to June 2008 to find income that dipped as low. The income dropped to $9.4 million then.

And PSSI continues to fall short of Wall Street expectations again and again. The company has missed revenue estimates for the last five quarters in a row and missed on earnings per share for the past three quarters, recently posting 18 cents actual versus 21 cents expected. 

In an email to TheStreetSweeper from Goldman Sachs, it's clear that one of the world's largest investment banks does not like the direction PSS is headed, either. Goldman maintained its "sell" rating recently and lowered its estimates of the company's future performance. 

"After reporting both a top-and bottom-line miss, it is difficult to gain increased conviction in the company's ability to meet both its near and long-term goals in a clearly still difficult environment," analyst Robert Jones wrote in the research report emailed to TheStreetSweeper. 

"Although management made no changes to the long-term outlook for the company, we believe investors will be looking for several quarters of positive performance before better understanding the growth trajectory."

Goldman lowered 2013 earnings estimates from $1.14 down to $1.05. The 2014 estimate dropped to $1.30 from $1.55, and the 2015 expectation dropped to $1.37 from $1.65.

"We make no change to our Sell rating, as the quarter does little to change our fundamental view of the company and industry at this point," Jones continued.

Other analysts are also debating whether PSSI can really pull off the $1.11 to $1.15 earnings per share that management has guided them to expect for its fiscal year 2013.

"The continuing operations earnings number was 18 cents ..." Larry Marsh, Barclays Capital analyst said during a recent conference call. "Obviously, if you back out the first quarter (looking at $1.11 to $1.15 earnings) … that would imply you got to do $0.30 to $0.35 a quarter for the next three quarters. You are confirming that that's very much doable based on results today?"

"Yes," PSSI chief financial officer David Bronson said. 

He also conceded that there will likely be some "choppiness" in results over the next few quarters as the company completes divestitures, reorganizes, adds to sales efforts and restructures its shared service support.

A New York City doctor who views PSS from the customer's standpoint sums up his take on the situation more bluntly.

"This is a desperate company," said the urologist, who wants to remain anonymous and is short PSSI. 


Tangoe: Dancing on an Old Grave, Digging a New Hole?

* Editor's Note: The following story is the first installment in a two-part investigative report on Tangoe (Nasdaq: TNGO), with the second article scheduled to soon follow.

Talk about tricky moves. As a young public company with a tainted leadership team and an expensive shopping habit, Tangoe (Nasdaq: TNGO) could have easily tripped over tough questions alone by now. So far, however, Tangoe has spent more than a full year successfully dancing around a maze of potential landmines.

While the previous company led by its CEO and CFO literally exploded – with the pair directly blamed for that notorious collapse – and its growth depends more heavily on acquisitions than management likes to admit, records indicate, Tangoe has yet to stumble even once since it burst onto the stage. A $20 highflier, in fact, Tangoe trades at a rich premium when compared to both the general sector overall and the specific multiples that it has paid for the companies it keeps buying to fuel its amazing growth.

Hatched a dozen years ago just as the first public company long steered by its top executives approached death, Tangoe specializes in the niche arena known as telecommunications expense management (TEM). In a nutshell, Tangoe basically promises notable reductions in a major ongoing business expense by using a technology-driven system designed to shrink the bloated bills that companies often receive for everything from Internet to landline and cell phone services.

Currently in the midst of a muscular growth spurt, Tangoe has spent the past two years gobbling up smaller players that resemble itself in order to further bulk up its own share of that tasty market. That feast has cost a fortune, however, with growth-hungry investors footing much of the tab along the way.

Tapping the capital markets twice in the span of just 10 months, records show, Tangoe has raised a combined $100 million (after fees) and effectively spent most of that to fuel the very growth that makes its stock look so appetizing in the first place. In a shopping frenzy that began around the festive season and never really stoppedrecords show, Tangoe has managed to run up a bill totaling more than $75 million on acquisitions so far (not counting the $4 million owed on previous deals) and still remains on the hunt for even more.

Because of that expensive (and often risky) growth strategy, Tangoe looks an awful lot like the so-called “rollup” companies that have by now given investors plenty of reason for alarm. 

As the last acquisition-driven company examined by TheStreetSweeper has already proven, those highfliers can sometimes crash in spectacular fashion. Just look at Swisher Hygiene (Nasdaq: SWSH) for some timely evidence. The stock chart for that rollup company tells a horror story (briefly summarized later) all by itself.


Medivation: Intoxicating Rally ... Imminent Hangover?

Until Medivation (Nasdaq: MDVN) can actually produce a commercial drug that lives up to the hype – now at levels that suggest a looming blockbuster even bigger than the market that it aims to serve – it will remain the same overvalued company it has always been since its 2004 debut on the penny-stock exchange. A highflier trading on the mere promise of a breakthrough treatment ever since it originally went public, utilizing a reverse-merger process long associated with pump-and-dump scams, Medivation has still yet to introduce a single product to the marketplace.

Despite the miserable failure of its original drug candidate, a Russian antihistamine fruitlessly tested for years as a treatment for Alzheimer’s disease, Medivation has staged a phenomenal comeback. Thanks to promising late-stage trials of its remaining prospect, a prostate cancer drug that allows dying patients to live a few weeks longer than rival breakthroughs on the market, Medivation already looks like a remarkable success. With its stock exploding from $15 to a recent all-time high of almost $90 a share, Medivation has managed to achieve a $3 billion market value well ahead of the long-awaited launch of its very first drug.

To Wall Street, the new Medivation treatment obviously seems like a valuable breakthrough. To urologists who spoke with TheStreetSweeper, however, that medication looks like just another temporary fix with an outsized sticker price.

“Most of these drugs tend to cost around $100,000,” one doctor emphasized. “That’s a lot of money for a few months of life.”

A former member of the Medivation board actually shares that point of view. While Medivation has yet to publicly announce the price of its new prostate cancer drug, Enzalutamide (previously MDV3100), the former director pegs the cost around $120,000 – higher even than an expensive rival and more than double the reported cost of a similar drug – while portraying the benefits as limited at best. He suspects that health insurers could easily reach a similar conclusion, restricting coverage of a six-figure drug that results in even steeper medical bills for terminal cancer patients, with that push-back ultimately curtailing sales.

By now, Dendreon (Nasdaq: DNDN) has already tested the same market – with miserable results – by charging anenormous price for a breakthrough prostate cancer treatment of its own. When Dendreon first secured approval of its $93,000 Provenge cancer vaccine two years ago, Reuters noted, bullish analysts automatically expected the drug to achieve blockbuster status. With doctors reluctant to even order the vaccine because of its gigantic sticker price, however, Dendreon soon lost its popularity on Wall Street and ultimately emerged as an outcast. 

former $55 highflier that peaked shortly after regulators cleared its first (and only) drug, Dendreon now languishes insingle-digit territory at just $7 a share.

Medivation currently trades at even loftier levels on the promise of a rival drug that may cost even more, but its former director wonders just how long that gigantic premium can last. While he fully expects the company to secure approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to market its new therapy, he still views Medivation as a $20 stock and nothing more.

“Look, I think it’s the most overpriced pharma stock out there,” he bluntly told TheStreetSweeper after selling his own shares. “I don’t know what’s holding that stock up.”


Jive Software: A 'Social Butterfly' with Borrowed Wings?

Editor's Note: The second article in this two-part report on Jive Software, which provides more detailed coverage of the risks posed by the looming release of its restricted stock and deeper analysis of its financial results, appears directly below this story.

Jive Software (Nasdaq: JIVE) may look incredibly hip right now, as a standout performer in the popular social media space, but the company largely owes a short-term “sympathy rally” – trumpeted by a suspicious firm that placed a bet on its stock – for its superstar status.

After debuting as a hot new Internet play last December, when it jumped 25% at the opening bell, Jive soon lost its early sizzle and spent more than a month simply trying to hold onto its original gains. That pattern continued until early February, when Facebook registered for its initial public offering and set off an explosion that ignited even long-shot players in the field. Jive itself finally caught on fire at that point, a notorious stock promoter loudly broadcasting its outsized gains, and spent two full months on a flight due north that took its stock all the way from $15 to $28 a share.

Jive executives now look incredibly rich as a result. They control almost a third of those highflying shares, records indicate, with the two young cofounders – who established Jive while in their early 20s (before Facebook revolutionized the entire industry) – boasting a combined net worth of more than $300 million all by themselves.

Since introducing its “Jive Engage” social networking platform to the business world five years ago, however, the company itself has yet to earn a dime.

“Apparently, there is inherent value in any software company that has the word ‘social’ included in their business summary,” Motley Fool contributor marveled back when Jive first escaped from the powerful forces of gravity. “But what has changed? (And) what will happen once the FB hysteria settles down?”


Jive Software: Current Star, Future Wallflower?

Editor's Note: The first article in this two-part report on Jive Software, which examines the hype-powered rally that set the stock on fire as a Facebook "sympathy play," appears directly above this story.

Talk about fancy moves. Before Jive Software (Nasdaq: JIVE) finally stumbled a few weeks ago, hammered by a wave of selling pressure that could dramatically escalate from here, the bleeding social media company danced all the wayfrom $14 to $28 a share – virtually doubling in a brief 70-day span – without any major breakthroughs on its part. Jive instead relied on a powerful “sympathy rally” for most of those huge gains, records indicate, suddenly exploding to life after Facebook announced plans for an initial public offering that temporarily shifted attention away from its own plight. (See the main story above for a detailed review of that hyped-up rally.)

Since Jive itself went public barely five short months ago, the company faces a looming overhang that could soon pound its richly valued shares. When Jive carried out its IPO late last year, past news coverage reveals, the company originally released less than one-quarter of its shares onto the public market and subjected the vast majority of its stock to trading restrictions that will expire very soon. 

Come June, records indicate, Jive could see roughly 38 million additional shares of company stock – much of it originally priced around $5 a share or less – start pouring into the marketplace. With Jive currently fetching almost $24 a share on the open market, where daily trading volume averages around 500,000 shares (the equivalent of just 1.3% ofthe restricted shares set for release), the stock looks rather vulnerable to say the least.

Jive actually took an early hit before its lockup period officially expired, a familiar pattern among young Internet stocks– such as Zynga (Nasdaq: ZNGA), Groupon (Nasdaq: GRPN) and even current standout LinkedIn (Nasdaq: LNKD) – that enjoyed temporary honeymoons after their celebrated public offerings last year. While Jive maintained its stamina longer than some other newcomers to the sector, records show, the stock finally reversed course about a month ago. Jivelost 20% of its value in the weeks that followed, shedding much of that during a heavy two-day selling spree, with the share count in its freely trading “float” somehow expanding (despite continued lockup restrictions) along the way.

Two venture capital firms control most of that restricted stock, records indicate, with both of them already recording massive returns on their investments at this point. Corporate insiders sit on a mountain of cheap restricted stock as well,records show, including a CFO who previously kept the books for a pair of young highfliers that soon collapsed and vanished from the stock market as the result of fire sales.

Last month, as Jive itself finally weakened under the pressure of an early selling spree, cautious investors started bracing for a serious meltdown.

“JIVE is one of the few IPOs holding up,” one investor noted last month, shortly after cutting his own stake in the company. “Gotta feeling its days are numbered.”


Sunpeaks (SNPK): Will This Hot Stock Go up in Flames?

Editor’s Note: TheStreetSweeper has prepared a more comprehensive report on Sunpeaks Ventures (SNPK) and the promotion of its stock, which can be accessed by clicking here.

Sunpeaks Ventures (OTC: SNPK.OB) may sport a humongous $725 million market value right now, but it’s still the same dinky vitamin distributor that captured little business – or attention – before AwesomePennyStocks decided to aggressively pump up its shares. A bleeding company with just $3,562 in revenue at the time of its latest financial report, Sunpeaks operates from an “executive office” that resembles a garage and peddles a vitamin supplement that costs three times as much as a similar product found on the shelves of CVS drugstores today.

As is often the case in the microcap arena, of course, the SNPK story is more about the extraordinary promotion of the stock than it is about the company itself. Until recently, SNPK remained an empty Nevada shell with plenty of stock – some 370 million shares – but no real business yet at all. 

SNPK morphed into a vitamin seller a couple of months ago, however, with its stock bursting onto the market a few weeks later in a flurry of trading activity. Although SNPK initially rose just 1 cent to 43 cents a share on March 8, its opening day of trade, it enjoyed massive volume from the start, with 160 million shares of the stock instantly changing hands. 

At that point, AwesomePennyStocks – the most powerful promoter in the business – had just begun touting SNPK to a vast network of subscribers who soon rushed to scoop up the brand-new shares. Barely one month later, with 50 promoters in charge of 351 different newsletters pumping the stock, SNPK has literally quadrupled in price and now commands $1.70 a share.

Like a select group of early investors, Whetu Inc. – a mysterious Panamanian firm that inherited a big chunk of SNPKas it emerged from its empty shell -- now sits on an outright fortune as a result. After issuing a modest $110,000 promissory note to SNPK last summer, records show, Whetu wound up with 50 million of its highflying shares. That stock, if sold at current prices, would command a whopping $85 million today.


Questcor: The Secret behind Its 'Miracle' Drug

* Editor’s Note: The following article is the second installment in a two-part investigative series on Questcor Pharmaceuticals that began earlier this week. The original story can be found just below this one on the homepage.

Thanks to patients like Garry Sefcovic, who suffer from a common form of multiple sclerosis punctuated by debilitating “flares,” Questcor (Nasdaq: QCOR) has seen orders for its only major product – an old drug viewed as worthless by its previous owners -- literally explode in recent years.

Yet Sefcovic, for one, wishes that he had never even tried that high-priced drug. Last winter, when he sought treatment for a painful MS flare, Sefcovic assumed that he would receive the same cheap IV steroids that had effectively relieved his condition in the past. He wound up seeing a different neurologist, however, who automatically prescribed Acthar Gel – sold by Questcor for a whopping $27,000 per dose – to address his MS flare instead.

“I have good insurance and a chronic disease fund that will pay my deductible,” Sefcovic noted when speaking withTheStreetSweeper late last year. “They made a lot of money off of me.

“Then they had to give me steroid pills after the Acthar,” he added. “I should have just been put on the IV steroids right away.”

Several giant health insurance companies – such as Aetna (NYSE: AET), Cigna (NYSE: CI) and Blue Cross/Blue Shield (BCBS) – would clearly share that reasoned point of view. In fact, as a matter of policy, they officially mandate IV steroids as a first-line treatment for MS flares and normally refuse to cover Acthar for patients who can rely on that cheaper therapy instead.

Notably, Sefcovic receives health insurance coverage from a company -- Medical Mutual -- that subjects Acthar to a careful pre-authorization process as well. Rather than automatically covering Acthar for the treatment of MS flares,records show, Medical Mutual specifically asks whether the patient “had a FAILURE or INTOLERANCE to treatment with corticosteroids” in the past and whether the patient is “a candidate to receive treatment with corticosteroids” at the present time. At that point, records indicate, the insurer then authorizes coverage of Acthar only for those patients who cannot use traditional steroid therapy to provide them with relief.

In contrast, Questcor has taken a far more liberal stand on those who should qualify for its pricy drug. Reaching beyond the narrow population of outright steroid failures, records indicate, Questcor also markets Acthar for other MS patients who simply fail to achieve the same “baseline function” that they enjoyed before their flare-ups occurred. Since many MS victims fall short of this success (as illustrated by the progressive nature of their disease), critics feel, Questcor has effectively repositioned Acthar as a first-line treatment for many patients who should receive cheaper steroid therapy instead.

Despite the clear restrictions placed on Acthar for the treatment of MS flares – the primary condition addressed by that medication today -- Questcor has achieved remarkably high reimbursement rates for its obscure drug. Even though Questcor has seen its coverage rate for Acthar slip over the past couple of years (declining from between 90% and 95% to “generally above 85%” in the latest quarter), records indicate, health insurers continue to pay the vast majority of those expensive medication claims.

That said, however, Sefcovic clearly feels that his own insurance company wasted a pile of money on an overpriced – and ultimately ineffective -- drug that he should have never even received.

“I actually would have preferred steroid treatments first, as I’ve always done in the past,” he said in a follow-up email toTheStreetSweeper earlier this week. “I lose a lot of faith in doctors this way.”


Questcor: A Bold Strategy Threatened by the Fine Print?

* Editor’s Note: The following article is the first story in a two-part investigative report on Questcor Pharmaceuticals, with the second installment currently scheduled for release by the end of this week. To receive immediate notification when the second article appears, click on this link to sign up for a free email alert.

As a longtime nephrologist, Dr. Gerald Stephanz felt somewhat surprised when a sales representative suggested that H.P. Acthar Gel – a 60-year-old drug marketed by Questcor Pharmaceuticals (Nasdaq: QCOR) – might help some of the patients he treats for kidney-related disorders. 

Stephanz had last used Acthar decades earlier, when caring for a patient suffering from multiple sclerosis during his residency, and had practically forgotten about the ancient medication since that time. He did remember that Acthar had once sold at a relatively cheap price, however, and that it had largely fallen out of favor after powerful IV steroids –embraced as a superior alternative – arrived on the scene. So the new price tag for Acthar (more than $25,000 a dose) and the new focus on nephrology (without solid clinical data) struck him as rather odd, to say the least.

Stephanz, for one, saw no compelling reason to try the expensive drug. He also felt offended by the “aggressive tactics” that led to a follow-up sales pitch at his office.

“The second time, they kind of ambushed me,” recalled Stephanz, who holds a board-level position with the Renal Physicians Association. “That’s when they tried to explain why the drug costs so much. 

“They have this package they give you,” he explained. “But the label doesn’t have any specific indication for any treatable kidney disease that I can see … How are they going to market this?”

By capitalizing on its high price (raised 1,300% literally overnight) and its broad label (approved in 1952 based on its perceived safety alone), Questcor hopes to transform Acthar into a true blockbuster drug. Questcor views Acthar as afull-blown pipeline, in fact, relying on that single medication for virtually all of its current revenue and its forecasted growth as well. 

Although Questcor reportedly paid just $100,000 for worldwide rights to Acthar – a product abandoned by its previous owners as a hopeless money-loser – the company now charges up to $250,000 for a single course of treatment utilizing that once-neglected drug. All told, Wall Street estimates, Questcor sold more than $210 million worth of Acthar in 2011 and – if recent growth trends prove sustainable – will likely see that total soar past $330 million over the course of the current year.

Questcor originally re-priced Acthar as an orphan drug used for an ultra-rare disease, records show, but the company now derives most of its revenue from soaring prescriptions for more widespread medical problems instead. In recent years, Questcor has dramatically expanded the market for Acthar by promoting it as a second-line treatment for patients who suffer from a common type of multiple sclerosis punctuated by debilitating flares. (TheStreetSweeper focuses primarily on that core market in the second part of this investigative report.) Inspired by that growth – driven in large part, former insiders say, by heavy prescribers who can pocket unlimited “speaker fees” for promoting the drug to others in the field -- Questcor has set out to replicate that success by pitching Acthar for another medical condition as well.

Last week, however, Questcor dropped a potential bombshell about this promising frontier. 

Questcor has routinely stated that it can market Acthar as an “on-label” treatment for nephrotic syndrome – including a specific kidney disease related to NS known as idiopathic membranous nephropathy (iMN) – and even announced plans, earlier this month, to double the number of sales reps focused on this profitable arena. That sales team has already generated plenty of new business for the company in the meantime, records show, with Acthar prescriptions for NS rocketing 145% (on a sequential basis) in the fourth quarter of 2011 alone. Less than a year after aggressively breaking into this brand-new market -- where each patient represents a handsome six-figure opportunity -- Questcor now counts NS as its biggest, and its most lucrative, growth driver by far.

While Questcor has long indicated that it can freely market Acthar for this condition (and has funded a minor study,focused on iMNthat serves as a critical sales aid), however, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has expressed a far more conservative view on this important matter. 

“The approval of this product for this particular use predates the modern FDA ‘efficacy’ requirement,” the agency noted in an email to TheStreetSweeper earlier this month. “For that reason, we feel that it is best to stick to the exact wording used in the label (i.e., induce a diuresis or a remission of proteinuria) and not say that they treat the disease.”


Universal Display: A Real Work of (Prior) Art?

* Editor's Note: TheStreetSweeper published its original investigative report on Universal Display (PANL) in October, when it took a close look at key changes in the company's long-term relationship with Samsung -- its largest source of commercial revenue by far -- and the flurry of insider sales that surrounded that important top-secret deal. Click here to access that earlier article.

When Universal Display Corporation (Nasdaq: PANL) originally patented the core technology that now ranks as its primary asset, historical records clearly suggest, the company simply combined two existing inventions and then celebrated the resulting “breakthrough” as its own.

For its part, UDC has long proclaimed that its research partners at Princeton University first discovered modern organic light emitting diode (OLED) technology in the late 1990s and then went on to develop the actual OLED materials that now illuminate the display screens of some popular handheld devices found on the market today. In fact, however, outside researchers actually reported similar achievements years before UDC ever arrived on the scene. Armed with evidence of that “prior art,” UDC rivals now hope to severely weaken – if not completely destroy – the broad OLED patents secured by the company. 

From the start, UDC has basically relied on two early patents to serve as the foundation for its entire portfolio. The first established the design of its fundamental technology, known as the “OLED stack,” while the second covered the special “emitter” compounds – since limited to iridium by patent authorities overseas – that generate the light in OLED-powered screens. By the time that UDC received (or even requested) those far-reaching patents, however, others had already documented similar breakthroughs in the field.

UDC did not respond to questions for this story.

Phillips Electronics actually patented a multilevel OLED stack back in the mid-1990s, records show, some two years before UDC followed up by presenting that same type of design. Moreover, when Phillips described the core elements of its invention in 1995, the company used the same kind of language – at times almost identical in nature – that UDC would later include in a related patent issued to the company six years down the road. 

Phillips is now challenging a European version of that UDC patent overseas, records show, using its own patent (along with the early research of others) to portray its smaller rival as a glorified copycat. In a nutshell, Phillips argues, UDC secured an unfair patent – based upon technology that “is not new” and “does not involve an inventive step” – that the company arguably should have never received at all.

Similarly, records indicate, UDC followed in the footsteps of others when formulating the “unique” OLED emitter materials – specifically those derived from iridium --covered in its second major patent as well. Long before UDC showcased this development, records show, outsiders had already traveled down that same path by establishing the power of iridium to generate light. Researchers at the University of Southern California-Santa Barbara first highlighted this breakthrough two full decades ago, in fact, with a separate group of scientists further advancing that discovery – using iridium to create light at room temperature this time – that same year.


RAYS of Sunshine ... or Clouds of Doom?

Raystream (OTC: RAYS.OB) recently began lighting up the skies of Pennyland by proclaiming that it had developed a new video-compression technology that outshines anything on the market today. In reality, however, Raystream appears to be selling open-source software – available at no charge – to anyone who wishes to use it. That software, known as “x264,” can be downloaded here for free.

Raystream burst into the spotlight with the help of an aggressive promotional campaign financed by an outfit known as Unlimited Trade, which also furnished startup money for the company. In a striking coincidence, covered in more detail below, Raystream and Unlimited Trade share a common link with a once-famous – but now-fallen – German Wunderkind named Tan Siekmann.  

When Raystream began trading under its current symbol this fall, the company issued a press release introducing the public to its video compression software. At the time, Raystream CEO Brian Peterson proudly declared that the company’s “disruptive technology could forever alter the way business is done online.” The announcement further explained that this “proprietary” technology “could reduce the bandwidth required to stream HD video online by up to 70%.”

The next day, Raystream revised that figure to “up to 90%” and revealed that – thanks to a generous infusion from Unlimited Trade – the company now had almost $2 million in cash on hand. Raystream and its promoters spent the weeks that followed celebrating the importance of this technology, boldly predicting that it was likely to unleash a torrent of demand.

So who, exactly, is the genius responsible for this magical breakthrough? The CEO runs a Dallas-based digital signage company known as Peterson-Hines and, upon joining Raystream, brought most of his staff from that firm (who worked as salespeople) along with him. Only Raystream Chief Information Officer Roman Rumpf and his sidekick Thomas Friedl, who heads the company’s German subsidiary, appear to have any real technology experience. 

More importantly, just how “proprietary” is Raystream’s video-compression technology? Not at all, it appears. On its website, Raystream invites the public to view a slick video that illustrates the technology’s capabilities. While no technology publication has reviewed -- or even discussed -- the Raystream software, a few techies took an interest in itand then took a close look at that video as well.

With little effort, they made a remarkable discovery. They found that the Raystream source code begins like this: x264 - core 112 - H.264/MPEG-4 AVC codec - Copyleft 2003-2010.

In a nutshell, that code reveals that Raystream “created” its technology using x264 – an open-source video-compression encoder based on the H.264/MPEG-4 AVC codec – that serves as the industry standard. Comically enough, Raystream never even bothered to change any of the default parameters included in that sequence.

Jason Garret-Glaser, one of the developers behind x264, told TheStreetSweeper that Raystream could have better concealed its secret by simply removing the header that included the telling “x264” within it. Thanks to that oversight, however, that four-digit introductory code jumps out as the first thing that anyone who examines the code will see.


Bio-Reference (BRLI): Loads of Dirty Laundry

* Editor’s Note: The following article is the second story in a two-part series on Bio-Reference Laboratories. Click hereto access the first article.

Back when Bio-Reference Laboratories (Nasdaq: BRLI) first began to capitalize on the growing market for lucrative specialty tests, the company installed a new executive – later accused of demanding “envelopes full of cash” from his underlings – to help oversee its big expansion plans.

Bio-Reference employed former Vice President of Sales John Littleton for the better part of a decade – delivering record numbers to Wall Street along the way -- before finally terminating him in early 2009 over suspected violations that had, by then, apparently dragged on for years. At that point, Bio-Reference itself calculated, Littleton had improperly collected a staggering $1.6 million by abusing his expense account and collecting secret bounties for recruiting new employees to the company. Although Bio-Reference ordered Littleton to forfeit that mountain of cash (pocketing funds allegedly owed to its extorted sales representatives instead), records show, the lab curiously stopped short of filing actual charges against him.

“BRL brought no criminal prosecution of Littleton, though his actions were self-evidently criminal,” court filings state. Moreover, “it did not inform its shareholders of the details of his actions …

“BRL simply accepted the $1.6 million – the proceeds of extortion – without returning any of it to the victims of the scheme,” the documents add. “In fact, Senior Vice President of Sales Charles Todd laughingly announced at a meeting of sales managers that BRL had just lowered its overhead by $1.6 million” as a result of that big payment.

A regular magnet for con men back in its early days, Barron’s observed this year, Bio-Reference has long blamed its checkered past on honest mistakes made by a young and naïve company. Even as a well-established laboratory, however, Bio-Reference has apparently failed to break free of that familiar pattern.

Bio-Reference still employed Littleton less than three years ago, for example, while the company continues to embrace Todd – accused of ignoring (and possibly joining) his former aide’s extortion scheme – as one of its most important leaders to this day. The company has installed an outright felon in its executive suite as well, records show, granting him the second-largest compensation package awarded to any member of its senior management team. Bio-Reference even faces some lingering ties to organized crime, court records indicate, with a suspected Gambino associate recently filing a multimillion-dollar lawsuit against the lab for allegedly breaking its promise to resume paying him once he got out of jail.


Is Bio-Reference Laboratories as Healthy as It Seems?

* Editor's Note: The following story is the first article in a two-part investigative report on Bio-Reference Laboratories (BRLI), with the second installment scheduled for publication next week. Readers who have signed up for our free email alerts, open to newcomers who fill out this form, will be immediately notified when the next article appears.

Three years ago, Bio-Reference Laboratories (Nasdaq: BRLI) introduced an elaborate – and expensive – version of the standard pap smear that has since become a celebrated, if controversial, driver of growth for the company.

With that test, known as GenPap, Bio-Reference greatly expanded the scope of a routine screening tool used on more than 50 million American women each year. By the time that GenPap hit the market, however, gynecologists had already spent decades effectively utilizing traditional pap smears and (if warranted) cheap supplemental tests to diagnose the most prevalent disorders suffered by the patients they treat.

While those mainstream laboratory tests narrowly focus on a handful of widespread conditions, singled out as relevantby government authorities, GenPap screens for about 20 different organisms (some of them viewed as harmless) linked to both common and rare disorders alike. In fact, as detailed more extensively below, at least one of those 14 ailments -- virtually absent except for occasional cases in a limited number of states -- barely registers as a disease in this country at all. 

Nevertheless, Bio-Reference promotes GenPap as a valuable test for “essentially all women” and employs an aggressivenationwide sales force to court the doctors who take care of them. Although Bio-Reference has reported explosive growth in its young women’s health division since launching GenPap, however, even some fans of the test question its suitability for such a broad swath of the female population.

“I use it selectively,” says Dr. John Siegle, a veteran obstetrician/gynecologist who trains third-year residents in the field. “It’s very, very pricey and not really cost-effective for society.

“If used selectively and appropriately, there is a place for it,” he adds. But “they’re pushing us to do this on everybody. (And) that can’t – that shouldn’t – be done.”


Universal Display (PANL): Sharp Rise, Fuzzy Picture

For a company that likes to brag about the sharp images created by its superior technology, Universal Display Corporation (Nasdaq: PANL) sure has painted a fuzzy picture for investors who helped recharge its fading stock

Less than two months ago, PANL had fallen below $25 a share – down sharply from the $63 peak it achieved this spring – on fears about a crucial contract used by Wall Street to assess the potential value of the company. PANL had by then spent more than a year simply extending its original contract with Samsung, its largest commercial customer by far, collecting royalty payments for use of patented technology that ranks as the smaller company’s primary asset. WhileGoldman Sachs and other bullish followers of the stock widely expected a jump in that royalty rate under a renegotiated deal, however, PANL ultimately revealed that the company would no longer receive royalty payments from the giant cell phone maker at all.

PANL nevertheless soared 85% the week the company announced that new long-term agreement, adding $1 billion to its market value in the span of five short days, with analysts mistakenly assuming that PANL would continue to receive royalty payments – but at an even higher rate – until the company itself ultimately proved them wrong. According to aheavily redacted version of that important contract, stripped free of any financials terms that would expose the true value of the deal, PANL will receive a mere “license fee” from Samsung – rather than royalties based on actual sales of products using its patented technology – and (unspecified) revenue from chemical sales to the giant electronics company going forward.

In other words, that contract indicates, PANL may never capitalize on the popularity of Samsung smart phones featuring the Organic Light Emitting Diode (OLED) technology that has long been viewed as the key to its own future success

“While terms were omitted, it is clear that the Samsung deal is a license agreement” and not a royalty-based agreement,Canaccord Genuity analyst Jonathan Dorsheimer conceded after PANL finally released an actual contract that reversed his earlier view. “Details are limited and are being kept to few senior executives at both SMD (Samsung Mobile Display) and UDC (Universal Display Corporation). Both parties believe they prevailed in the terms of the agreement, none of which where disclosed in the 8K” that included the heavily redacted contract.

PANL failed to answer questions for this story.

Notably, records indicate, PANL suffered a major legal setback that could have seriously weakened its own negotiating power – while bolstering that held by Samsung – when the two parties hammered out the terms of that long-delayedagreement. Back in late March, records show, the Japanese Patent Office invalidated all of the claims covered under two important PANL patents that had previously protected the company’s OLED technology and required Samsung to pay royalties based on sales of its OLED-enabled devices. While PANL escaped an immediate hit on that overlooked court ruling, with the stock actually soaring to a record high above $63 a share the very next week, it began to spiral lowerafter The Korea Times – an English-language newspaper in the country where Samsung is based – stepped forward topublicize the development.

Barely a month after that foreign newspaper article appeared, gradually catching the attention of PANL bears in the weeks that followed, the stock had fallen to just half the record price that it had boasted in the spring. PANL continued to lose ground throughout most of the summer, sinking below $25 in early August, but the stock suddenly began toreverse course as the company finally neared the end of its drawn-out negotiations with Samsung.

PANL soared 24% to almost $35 a share the day before the company even announced that new agreement, a strikingjump on massive volume that would soon raise eyebrows at CNBC, and then rocketed straight past $40 on official news of the long-awaited deal. Although Wall Street rushed to celebrate that vague announcement as a big victory for PANL, however, The Korea Times took the opposite stand by portraying Samsung as the likely winner – poised to save “millions of dollars” in royalty fees – under that new contract instead. 

“The developments could allow firms based in Asia, such as Samsung and LG, to manufacture OLEDs,” one fund manager stated in the article, “without having to pay royalties to UDC for materials used.”


GORO Stock: Finally Time for Sticker Shock?

Years ago, around the same time that it debuted on the OTC Bulletin Board, Gold Resource Corporation (AMEX:GOROhired a young promoter who would later present a detailed valuation formula that – if updated with even the high end of current production estimates – now suggests that the company’s shares are ridiculously overpriced.

A recent college graduate when he landed GORO as his first client, records show, Ian Cassel dutifully set out to publicize the hot new penny stock and (with the company compensating him for his services) quickly became asignificant shareholder himself. He loudly celebrated the stock for years, touting GORO alongside some risky small-cap names that included at least one reputed fraud, and -- by his own admission last September – pocketed big gains as those shares soared ever higher.

At the time that he mentioned his profit-taking, records indicate, Cassel had just published his last big report on GORO during his final days as a vocal cheerleader for the company. Back then, with GORO fast approaching $20 a share, Cassel actually suggested that the stock looked somewhat pricey for new investors who had missed out on the rally that helped fatten his own bank account.

“My cost basis in GORO is $1.35, and I’ve sold a nice chunk along the way, so take that into consideration,” he allowed a year ago. “I wouldn’t blame anyone for being skeptical about buying at these levels after this run-up.”

(TheStreetSweeper hoped to interview Cassel before publishing this story. It could not locate him, however, because hedisabled his website earlier this year.)

Cassel sounded a whole lot more confident when he could base his analysis of the stock, which he valued at $22 a sharealmost two full years ago, on rosy production estimates rather than the actual results that the company would deliver on down the road. GORO nevertheless flew straight past his target price, eventually peaking above $31 a share earlier this year, even though the company has yet to approach (let alone achieve) the projected earnings that served as the basis for that lofty target.

His original formula, when applied to the latest production estimates for 2011 (the company’s first full year of actual gold production), indicates that GORO should trade for less than half the price that the stock currently enjoys.


GORO: A Rich Gold Miner That Acts Dirt Poor?

Gold Resource Corporation (AMEX: GORO) sure has raised some eyebrows with its curious spending habits. 

Over the years, GORO has splurged on plenty of things – glorified promoters for its stockhefty compensation for its insidersexpensive dividends for its shareholders – but the company has regularly cut corners, adopting a downright thrifty stand, in one critical area. Despite its evolution from a penny-stock company into a $1 billion corporation trading on a respectable exchange, GORO has long refrained from hiring accomplished experts to double-check the numbers that power its stock price.

For starters, as highlighted by TheStreetSweeper in a big investigative report already, GORO has yet to invest in a standard feasibility study that would replace its own bullish production estimates with formally established gold and silver reserves. The company has taken a frugal approach on other key services as well, records indicate, saving additional money (while further limiting outside scrutiny) by relying on a cheap auditor and a part-time CFO to oversee its books. In fact, records show, GORO spent more on the boardroom director who chairs its audit and compensation committees – identified as a “promoter” in outside corporate filings -- than it did on its auditor or its CFO last year.

Still, GORO has long rewarded the relatives who serve as its top executives with the biggest compensation packages of all. The company doubled the six-figure salaries for all three of those relatives last year, records show, and then further sweetened the deal by issuing them “discretionary” bonuses equal to their newly expanded salaries. GORO spent more than $2.3 million in cash last year on those three executives, records show, who scored another $12.5 million by dumping stock (most of it at much higher prices than those seen today) during a massive insider-selling spree that began just a few months after they snagged their handsome raises


Will GORO Ever Find That Magic Pot of Gold?

After years of practice, Gold Resource Corporation (AMEX: GORO) has clearly perfected the art of delivering well-spun news that works magic on the company’s generous share price.

Despite a sea of potential red flags -- ranging from undocumented gold reserves to closely related executives to relentless insider sales -- GORO has managed to become one of the hottest gold stocks on the market, even though the company has produced very little of that glittering treasure at all. Rather, since going public in the fall of 2006, GORO has spent most of its time making big promises (sweetened by a handy surge in gold prices) that it consistently fails to keep. The company has nevertheless seen its stock skyrocket from its original price of $1.15 to an all-time high of $31.38 earlier this year, settling near $25 currently, with insiders cashing in millions of dollars worth of profits along the way.

GORO has soared 80% over the course of the past 12 months alone, handily outperforming far more established and successful gold miners – including industry heavyweights Barrick Gold (NYSE: ABX), Goldcorp (NYSE: GG) and Newmont Mining (NYSE: NEM) – that have racked up much smaller gains, ranging from 3.6% to 23%, on the steady explosion in gold prices. With a market value of $1.29 billion, GORO is currently trading at a stunning 28 times its prior-year sales. In contrast, GORO’s three giant peers – which measure their profits in the billions – all sport traditional single-digit price-to-sales ratios instead. 

Moreover, despite the eye-catching gold label included in its name, GORO actually counts silver – a less illustrious metal that sells at a tiny fraction of gold’s price – as its biggest product by far. Last quarter, for example, GORO sold just 2,384 ounces of gold – less than Barrick produces (on average) every 15 seconds -- while relying on cheaper silver for 99% of its overall production during that three-month period. In a rather curious feat, however, GORO somehow managed to report incredibly high prices for the small pile of gold that the company did happen to sell. 

Specifically, GORO pegged its average gold price at $1,576 an ounce – a peak seen only one day throughout the entire second quarter -- even though the company has traditionally sold all of its gold to a single customer that, with any business savvy at all, could have requested volume discounts or simply purchased that gold at cheaper prices on the regular spot market. In contrast, despite their marketing muscle, the industry’s three largest miners all reported lower average gold prices (ranging from $1,501 to $1,516 an ounce) for the mountains of gold they sold during that same period.


Miller: Meltdown Continues for This Once-Hot Oil Stock

Late Friday, with its stock hammered on questions raised by TheStreetSweeper in a big investigative report, Miller Energy Resources (NYSE: MILL) rushed to soothe nervous investors with a clean – but premature – audit opinion on a tardy annual report that otherwise looked like an ugly mess.

That formal 10K filing included a crucial blessing from KPMG that lent credibility to financial statements previously approved only by a tainted small-time auditor, notorious for validating the books of dubious Chinese-reverse merger companies, instead. Three days later, however, Miller quietly published an 8K on its company website – absent for up to an hour (or more) from the official website operated by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission – revealing that KPMG had yet to even complete its audit of the financial statements that it had reportedly approved.  Miller further disclosed that its own audit committee had determined over the weekend, a period marked by hopeful celebrations among relieved investors, that the company’s brand-new financial statements – as well as the audit attributed to KPMG and the consent to use that audit report -- “should not be relied upon” because of looming revisions down the road.

Miller’s stock, which recorded double-digit gains on reports of the audited financials early Monday morning, soon began to tank on news of the 8k filing before that document even surfaced – where investors could easily find it – on the SEC website. The shares plummeted from a high of almost $5 to a low beneath the $3 mark, sinking a total of 42.8% in less than two hours, after the company dropped its alarming bombshell. Although the stock has since clawed its way back toward $3.50 a share, it still fetches half the price that it commanded before TheStreetSweeper first exposed Milleras a risky company less than a week ago.

Peter J. Henning, a law professor who formerly served as a senior attorney for the enforcement division of the SEC, suggested that the company could face even more pain – including possible backlash from securities regulators and its new auditing firm alike – as a result of its recent actions.

“The SEC is going to notice this,” said Henning, who worked as both a regulator and a prosecutor before assuming his current post as a law professor focused on white-collar crime at Wayne State University. “You can’t file a 10K without audited financials; that’s a precondition … I suspect that KPMG will want to know how this happened and, if they don’t get straight answers, they will be gone.

“It looks like somebody, somewhere, had to have lied,” concluded Henning, who writes a popular column for the “White-Collar Watch” section of The New York Times. “It’s hard not to draw any conclusion other than that this was basically fraud.”


Miller Energy: Is This Hot 'Alaska' Stock about to Melt?

Before Miller Energy Resources (NYSE: MILL) purchased some abandoned assets in Alaska for $4.5 million – or barely half the price that its CEO paid for his sprawling Tennessee mansion – and then pegged the value of those assets at more than $350 million on its books, the company spent years fruitlessly trying to escape from the penny-stock arena through smaller deals that often wound up backfiring instead.

Those previous deals triggered serious legal disputes, with one of them crippling Miller for years and another – while touted as a “huge victory” for the company at the time – since quietly reversed this May on appeal. Miller could face potentially significant liabilities, far exceeding its modest cash resources, if the company fails to overcome that recent courtroom setback. Meanwhile, Miller has been slapped with a brand-new lawsuit – this one related to the Alaska deal itself – seeking piles of warrants for dirt-cheap stock from the company as well.  

Despite that alarming track record, however, Miller has managed to convince investors that the company finally hit the jackpot – by snagging valuable assets that its previous owners (now bankrupt) initially could not sell – this time around. Miller’s stock, which fetched mere pennies on the lowly Pink Sheets just a few short years ago, now commands $7 a share after snagging a coveted spot on the premiere New York Stock Exchange. The company currently boasts a handsome market value of $280 million, almost 12 times its prior-year sales, even though it relied on a gigantic gain on its new Alaskan assets for the only dramatic profit that it has ever recorded since going public through a reverse merger almost 15 years ago.

But experts contacted by TheStreetSweeper, including skeptics in both the energy and financial sectors, have expressed clear doubt about those numbers. For example, an executive at Nabors Industries (NYSE: NBR) -- a $7.6 billion energy giant that decided against buying those assets for itself -- estimated that Miller actually wound up with just $25 million to $30 worth of assets, offset by $40 million worth of liabilities, through that transaction instead.

“That deal had been on the Street for over a year; everybody and their brother had looked at it,” said Jordan “Digger” Smith, who manages energy projects for Nabors – which actually operated Miller’s new properties – all across the country. “I’m a geologist, with 54 years of experience, and I can’t see how anybody can write that up on their books for $350 million … There are not $350 million worth of assets there.”


Portage Resources: Selling Fool's Gold with a Smile?

With the help of a powerful stock-promotion campaign, Portage Resources (OTCQB: POTG.PK) – a cash-poor company ignored by investors for years – has magically transformed itself into a valuable Peruvian miner, sporting an incredible market capitalization of almost $600 million, in a metaphorical blink of the eye. 

On June 14, records show, POTG closed at a modest 11 cents a share on a quiet (if somewhat typical) trading session in which no company stock changed hands at all. When POTG reported that the company itself had changed hands the following day, however, the stock suddenly exploded – almost tripling in price on massive volume of 34 million shares – and kept soaring all the way past the $1 mark, peaking near $1.15 earlier this week, even though the dirt-poor company has no more gold or silver than it did when that breathless rally first began.

Under the leadership of its new majority owner, Paul Luna Belfiore (identified in a corporate filing as “Mr. Belfiore” and elsewhere as simply “Paul Luna” instead), POTG kicked things off with a couple of press releases – hardly earth-shaking in nature -- that seemed to miraculously revive its near-comatose stock. The first announcement simply revealed that Luna, portrayed as a mining engineer with decades of experience in Peru, had taken over as CEO and president of the company. The second, issued the same day, followed up by trumpeting the company’s plans to focus its mining activities on potentially lucrative opportunities in the South American country of Peru.

Armed with a $250,000 publicity budget, Capital Financial Media – the backer of massive promotion campaigns for such ill-fated penny stocks as Clicker (OTC: CLKZ.PK) and Horiyoshi Worldwide (OTC: HHWW.OB) – began to work its notorious market-moving powers. For the token sum of $1,000, or about double the cash in POTG’s barren bank account, CFM hired newcomer “Penny Stock Pillager” to quickly issue a bullish report predicting that POTG could rapidly surge to $3.32 a share and deliver early investors short-term gains of more than 1,100 percent in the process.

“My advice?” the Penny Stock Pillager remarked. “Stop reading this now, and consider calling your broker or logging on to your online trading account and grabbing as many shares as you’re comfortable with. You don’t want to find yourself on the outside looking in on this one.”


CIGX Leader: Blowing Smoke While Investors Choke?

* Editor’s: The following article is the second story in a two-part series. Click here to access the original article.

Give Jonnie Williams, the CEO of recent highflier Star Scientific (Nasdaq: CIGX), some credit. By now, records indicate, Williams has proven that he can literally sell anything – cars, houses, contact lenses and, above all, risky medical stocks – even if his customers, particularly investors, often wind up on the losing end of those business deals.

Over the years, Williams has clearly polished his act. Early on, records show, he found himself sanctioned by securities regulators for allegedly paying a stock promoter to issue bullish reports on a doomed biotech company while he was secretly dumping a big chunk of his own shares. Since then, however, he has learned to distance himself fromaggressive stock promotions that seem to magically erupt (along with his current company’s shares) without any obvious involvement on his part. 

Take Star, for example, a combination tobacco-biotech play that boasts a market value of $600 million – more than 700 times its prior-year sales – even though the company has spent almost a decade operating in the red. Star has more than doubled since the beginning of the year, rocketing from $2 to $5 this spring alone and overcoming a recent slide (which took it back below $3) to climb back toward the $5 mark once again. 

The stock peaked at $5.35 on May 31, when it closed above $5 for the first time in years and paved the way for Williams to exercise millions of newly issued options – priced below $3 a share – in the process. Williams and his family already owned more than 20 million shares in the company (including stock options and warrants) even before that, records show, a massive stake worth almost $100 million based on current market prices. He recently signaled plans to sell about 1 million of those shares in official corporate filings that registered more than 12 million shares sold earlier this year, for $2 or less, through the latest in a series of dilutive private placement deals.

Meanwhile, as the top executive of Star – a former cigarette company now pursuing miraculous breakthroughs in the healthcare arena -- Williams has spent more than a decade refining and perfecting one of his most powerful sales pitches of all. In the original script, the Richmond Times-Dispatch reported long ago, Williams somehow outsmarts Big Tobacco – with its gigantic research budgets and its fancy Ph.D. scientists – by developing a safer tobacco-curing process after experimenting with his microwave oven. He then sues industry powerhouse R.J. Reynolds (NYSE: RAI) for utilizing a similar system, the Associated Press has since explained, seeking massive damages from the tobacco giant for allegedly infringing on the patents for his remarkable invention. 

For almost a decade, the Times-Dispatch later noted, that story has served as the primary driver behind Star shares – alternately sending them above $5 and below $1 – as the dramatic, yet inherently unpredictable, courtroom fight continues to unfold.

A few years ago, faced with a string of nasty legal setbacks that threatened its very survival, Star essentially swapped that worn-out script for a more compelling story. In this version, loudly trumpeted by speculative bulls, Williams has managed to outsmart Big Pharma – once again besting a deep-pocketed industry with massive research budgets and stables of well-trained scientists – by uncovering a tobacco-based substance that promises an effective new treatment for Alzheimer’s disease.


CIGX: A Hot Tobacco Stock Ignited by Wild Pipe Dreams?

* Editor’s Note: This story is the first in a two-part investigative series, with the second article scheduled to run after the Fourth of July holiday.

Over the years, regulatory filings show, Star Scientific (Nasdaq: CIGX) has often changed its pretty story -- with the former cigarette maker now spinning tobacco as the key to breakthrough medical cures – but the company has rarely changed its ugly numbers. 

Star posted its highest revenue as a discount cigarette maker more than a decade ago, records show, and has generated dismal sales (and absolutely no profits) ever since shedding that traditional tobacco business. Last year, for example, Star posted total revenue of just $848,000 – or less than 1% of the $223 million in record 2000 sales it achieved as a profitable cigarette company – while recording an annual loss (a number that keeps growing) for the eighth straight year in a row. 

Star nevertheless boasts a market value of almost $600 million, some 35% higher than its peak market value during the year the company achieved its strongest financial results on record, and currently trades at an astounding 720 times its prior-year sales. If investors assigned Star the same multiple now as they did back then, the company would sport a market value of just $1.68 million – with its $4.50 stock fetching barely a penny a share – instead.

For years, corporate filings reveal, Star has enjoyed far more success selling its story (and the stock it keeps issuing in order to stay afloat) than it has at actually selling its unpopular products. Star executed the latest in a series of private placements during the first quarter of this year, with enough warrants and stock options now outstanding – at average exercise prices of around $2 a share – to increase the company’s swelling share count, which totaled less than 60 millionback in 2000, by another 33% to almost 180 million shares. The restrictions on the last of that cheap stock should expire this September, records indicate, with the shares facing a potential slide toward $3 unless the company’s handsome market value further expands to absorb that looming dilution hit.

Of course, that price assumes that investors continue to value Star based on its ambitious plans and keep ignoring the company’s miserable results. Without the speculative hype provided by its long-shot dreams, which alternate betweenbeating Big Tobacco for massive damage awards and beating Big Pharma for blockbuster miracle cures, Star would arguably lose all of the appeal that makes it one of the most active (and volatile) small-cap stocks on the Nasdaq exchange.


JAMN Cools off While Escaping SEC Heat

When the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission recently suspended trading in 17 dubious microcap companies, the agency spared one notorious player – Jammin Java (OTC: JAMN.OB) – that easily ranks among the most overhyped penny stocks of the entire year.

Fueled by an aggressive promotional campaign, far more powerful than those lifting the stocks actually included on the SEC hit list, JAMN exploded from 17 cents to $6.35 a share before losing more than half of its value afterTheStreetSweeper began raising serious questions about the company. Within days, JAMN quickly shed $250 million worth of its market value, as cold reality sobered up giddy investors previously drunk on overblown hype.

“They may be called ‘penny stocks,’” the SEC observed when announcing its recent crackdown, “but victims of microcap fraud can suffer devastating losses.”

While the SEC excluded JAMN from its net, focusing on older favorites of penny-stock promoters instead, the agency cited many concerns that look quite relevant to JAMN itself. Like most of the stocks caught in that SEC halt, JAMN clearly surged on paid promotions – recording huge gains in both its trading volume and its share price – since the company’s dismal operational results, including barely $1,000 in annual sales, could hardly inspire even a meager rally in the shares. Moreover, like the promotions that boosted those other penny stocks, the JAMN campaign has relied on shadowy figures hiding behind mysterious websites and financed by obscure “third-party” outfits to set the company’s stock on fire. As covered in more detail below, the JAMN campaign also bears striking similarities to another aggressivepromotion – touting shares of Big Bear Mining (OTC: BGBR.OB) – that has already ended horribly for gullible investors.


JAMN Finally Spills the Beans -- And It's an Ugly Mess

* Editor's Note: Readers can access links to additional backup documents for this story by clicking here for TheStreetSweeper's original investigative report on this company.

Late Tuesday afternoon, after missing earlier deadlines, Jammin Java (OTC: JAMN.OB) filed a long-awaited annual report packed with enough eye-opening news to keep investors up all night. That mandatory filing, unaccompanied with a cheerful press release heralding its arrival, served as a painful wake-up call to shareholders already burned by a rapid plunge in the company’s stock price.

To be sure, the 10-K offered investors little reason to sing. For starters, the filing reveals, this once-hot “coffee company” sells no coffee of its own at all. JAMN relies on a supplier based in frigid Canada – far away from the tropical Jamaican home of its co-founder Rohan Marley – to provide the company with an actual product to sell to its customers instead.

Back in April of 2010, JAMN inked a “supply and toll agreement” with Canterbury Coffee of British Columbia that gave it access to some brew. According to that agreement, JAMN relies on Canterbury to fulfill every role – save a minor one – normally satisfied by a firm that classifies itself as a coffee company. Canterbury purchases the coffee beans. It roasts them. And it then packages them in bags supplied by JAMN – the company’s only real product – for sale to the public.

JAMN signed this deal more than a year ago, right before Shane Whittle – a notorious Vancouver stock promoter – officially resigned as CEO of the company. But the company never mentioned that agreement, seemingly material enough to warrant at least a quiet 8-K report, in a single regulatory filing until now.   


Jammin Java (JAMN): Hot Stock ... Bitter Aftertaste?

It’s time to wake up and smell the coffee! That’s exactly what Jammin Java (OTC: JAMN.OB), a heavily promotedcoffee company, and – for very different reasons – TheStreetSweeper would like investors to do.

Since the beginning of the year, JAMN has miraculously risen from the ashes of the “Grey Market” graveyard to become one of the liveliest – and richest – stocks in the entire microcap arena. JAMN has seen its stock shoot straight toward heaven, soaring from 55 cents to peak above $6 a share on massive daily volume, with its market value nowtopping $355 million despite the company’s limited resources and operating history. (As covered in more detail below, two of the Internet tout sheets pushing JAMN the hardest effectively vanished -- disabled by their Internet servers -- on the day the stock’s trading volume exploded past 20 million shares.) 

JAMN stands out for its powerful connections, the first loudly celebrated by the company and the second – involving anotorious stock promoter – carefully hidden from view.

For starters, as the company well knows, JAMN comes complete with a very seductive story. JAMN counts Rohan Marley – one of seven children fathered by iconic Jamaican musician Bob Marley – as both current chairman and original cofounder of the company. Thanks to Marley’s son, JAMN has found itself with an attention-grabbing asset.

Through a private firm known as Marley Coffee LLC, corporate filings show, Rohan Marley has granted JAMN an “exclusive, transferrable, worldwide license” to use the “Marley Coffee” name to market the expensive coffee it apparently began selling just a few months ago. JAMN imports its coffee beans from Africa and Central and South America (rather than Jamaica itself), the company said, and then roasts them right here in North America before ultimately marketing the finished product – retailing for up to $72 (for a variety pack) before discounts -- with help from the beloved Marley name.

Since JAMN was still classified as a “shell” corporation when it filed its latest financial statements in December, reporting no revenue or cash in the bank at all, investors have been bidding up the stock based on mere faith – as opposed to actual evidence – that the company can drum up huge demand for its high-priced coffee. If the multiplesassigned to industry powerhouse Starbucks (Nasdaq: SBUX) serve as any guide, investors are basically treating JAMN like a company that sells almost $150 million worth of coffee a year already and boasts healthy profit margins (approaching 10%) on those sales to boot. 


NOG: Putting a Pretty Face on an Ugly Deal?

Now that Northern Oil and Gas (AMEX: NOG) has finally hired a respected “Big Four” auditor to review its books – blessed internally by an audit chair who reportedly overlooked Enron’s massive fraud – the company could find itself with a lot of explaining to do. The possible questions range from obvious ones, like those covering the decline rates and depletion expenses for NOG’s gushing Bakken wells, to bizarre ones like this: If NOG has accumulated such a valuable portfolio of acreage out in North Dakota, the most attractive region in the oil-soaked Bakken shale, then why has the company sold rights to wells on more than 15% of its North Dakota leases to a mysterious firm established by a young cosmetologist – but officially led by one of its largest original shareholders -- while booking nominal proceeds, at best, from those potential related-party deals?

NOG has spent years loudly promoting its frenetic acquisitions in the oil-rich Bakken region, pushing its market capitalization above $2 billion at its peak, but the company has never even mentioned the pile of assets it sold along the way. All told, state records show, NOG has purchased approximately 400 leases in North Dakota during its breathless shopping spree. Meanwhile, that database reveals, NOG has sold roughly 80 North Dakota assets – the vast majority to an obscure firm that’s struck only a handful of deals with other sellers in the state – and, in some cases, has recorded no apparent proceeds from those transactions at all.

NOG transferred its interest in at least 70 North Dakota oil wells to an outfit known as Ashwood Resources, records indicate, a firm that operates out of a post office box in the same tiny Minnesota suburb that the company itself calls home. Notably, records show, Ashwood currently lists Brittany Reger – the wife of NOG Chief Michael Reger – as the official contact person for the firm.


Could Swisher Hygiene Go Down the Toilet -- Again?

* Editor's Note: For the record, TheStreetSweeper wishes to make clear that it uncovered no evidence showing (or even suggesting) that the current officers and directors of Swisher have engaged in any illegal or improper activities at any time prior to or during the leadership of the company.

Swisher Hygiene (Nasdaq: SWSH) may have polished its act since going public again, as suggested by the sweeping gains in its stock price, but it nevertheless remains a bleeding sanitation company with a pile of dirt attached to its name.

Shunned like trash before its rescue by Wayne Huizenga and Steven Berrard, longtime business partners credited with building the giant Blockbuster (OTC: BLOBQ.PK) chain during its pre-bankruptcy glory days, Swisher has managed to repackage itself as a future powerhouse – worth more than $1 billion – in the mundane sanitation business. The pair paid less than $20 million for the original Swisher, records indicate, a company sullied at the time by past fraud allegations and a criminal conviction that sent its namesake founder to jail. The duo operated Swisher as a private company for about five years, records show, then took it public again last November through a reverse merger with a Canadian shell caked with some muddy baggage of its own.

They tried to dress Swisher up with acquisitions in the meantime, corporate filings show, but their familiar “roll-up” strategy failed to deliver consistent revenue gains – let alone actual profits – along the way.

Nevertheless, Swisher saw its market value swell to almost $1.7 billion last month following a breathless rally that had more than doubled its share price since the beginning of the year. While its market value has since fallen to $1.3 billion, following a recent slide in its stock from $11.43 to $8.77 a share, Swisher still commands a rich premium – trading at 19.6 times sales in a sector where the dominant player trades for just two times sales instead -- that looks downright gigantic based on traditional measurement tools. 

Swisher faces the threat of massive dilution, too, which could expand its share count from 148.5 million to almost 260 million (or by 75%) over the course of the next year. The company also carries some less obvious weight, research suggests, with the potential to hammer its stock long before that time.


LEXG: The Biggest Snow Job of the Year?

With oil prices on the rise worldwide, and nuclear reactors leaking in Japan, alternative energy stocks continue to soar, especially in Pennyland. Green may be good, but many of the “green” companies trading in the microcap arena – particularly highflying Lithium Exploration Group (OTC: LEXG.OB) – could burn investors if they run out of fuel and crash.

They can still be promoted and played, of course, as veterans of the shady penny-stock world well know. And companies promising to search for lithium, which powers the batteries used in new and increasingly popular electric cars, rank among the clear favorites in this risky space.

Today, LEXG stands out as the biggest star by far. The company generates no revenue, corporate filings show, and will likely need years to do so if it manages to survive that long. It had no cash on hand at the end of 2010, either, and it managed to raise a mere $250,000 through a private placement deal earlier this year. But thanks to a $3.3 millionpublicity campaign – possibly record-breaking in price – LEXG has skyrocketed from 12 cents to almost $4 a share in barely a month and now boasts a market value that’s approaching $200 million. 

If history serves as any guide, however, LEXG will fail to hold onto even a fraction of those remarkable gains. A year ago, TheStreetSweeper scrutinized three similar companies in a detailed report entitled “Can the Batteries Last on Overcharged Lithium Stocks?” That question has long since been answered, alas, with all three stocks sinking from impressive highs to increasingly miserable lows.


NOG: The Dirt-Filled Cracks in the Rags-to-Riches Story

* Editor’s Note: The following is the second story in a two-part series on Northern Oil and Gas. Simply click here to access the earlier article.

Northern Oil and Gas (AMEX: NOG) sure boasts a pretty stock chart for a company with so many ugly stains.

In just two short years, NOG has managed to overcome its dark history as a dubious penny-stock company to become one of the brightest stars in the entire energy sector. With its stock rocketing from $2 to $29.44 during that brief period, including a 150% jump since last May alone, NOG now sports a generous $1.8 billion market value that rivals those achieved by far more established players – with far less baggage – in the red-hot energy space.

Of course, NOG proudly showcases the company’s best features – its exploding revenue, its perfect drilling record, its heavy focus on the oil-soaked Bakken shale – in the pictures it paints when seeking to impress Wall Street. Meanwhile, throughout its recent rally, NOG has managed to escape the harsh public spotlight that burned it once but has since faded away and allowed fresh dirt to gather under the safe cover of dark.

Still, corporate filings reveal, those blemishes – the tainted company founders, the incestuous business arrangements, the fishy transfer agent, the sanctioned stock promoter, the relentless insider sales (which skyrocketed last week) – lurk just below the surface ready to grab the attention of curious bears or even distracted bulls who suddenly decide to open their eyes and take a careful look. Just one of those festering sores, let alone a combination of all of them and more, could prove damaging enough to leave permanent scars on NOG and its gorgeous stock price.


NOG: Lasting Fairy Tale or Looming Horror Story?

* Editor’s Note: The following is the first story in a two-part series on Northern Oil & Gas.

To some, Northern Oil & Gas (AMEX: NOG) looks like a Cinderella stock without the fairy-tale ending.

An obscure microcap company just a few short years ago, NOG has magically transformed itself into one of the hottest names in the energy sector by capitalizing on easy oil discoveries in the Bakken shale to generate a huge – if unsustainable – explosion in growth. With its revenues tripling and its profits more than doubling over the course of the past year, records show, NOG has understandably won over a growing crowd of fans. 

NOG’s highflying stock recently hit a record of almost $34 a share, up 1,500% from its 2009 lows, before finally giving up some of its breathless gains earlier this month. Even at its current price of $28.25, however, NOG still boasts a $1.72 billion market value that reminds skeptics of Cinderella on that wondrous night just before midnight struck.

To be sure, as recent headlines clearly indicate, NOG comes with a powerful bull story. In a nutshell, the bull case – which magically addresses the key issues raised by company bears in the past – goes something like this. NOG employs a well-connected CEO who has used his family’s deep roots in Montana and nearby North Dakota to negotiate valuable leases in the oil-rich Bakken shale. Moreover, NOG has secured that land at cheap prices – spending a fraction of the amount paid by larger Bakken players – by focusing on small “non-operated” properties that have yet to be explored. The company has then kept its overhead to a minimum, employing fewer than a dozen full-time workers, by partnering with established operators that actually drill the wells in exchange for a majority share of the gains that flow from those projects.

As a result, NOG has managed to minimize risks and maximize returns – without a single report of a dry hole – while generating massive gains for the company and those who have purchased its popular stock.

NOG has posted an impressive string of record-breaking numbers throughout that breathless rally. This month, however, NOG quietly disclosed a special “adjustment” that jumped out at skeptics of the company. Specifically, critics note, NOG recorded a $3.5 million depletion charge – signaling a potentially material slowdown among its fast-gushing wells – that caused a big spike in its fourth-quarter depletion expense. With Bakken wells notorious for their rapid depletion rate, critics say, NOG has long faced that inevitable hit.

“Their depletion numbers have appeared low,” says John Hempton, chief investment officer of Bronte Capital Management in Australia. “I think they will be taking more depletion charges – which may be very large – in the future … When you’ve extracted the oil, but you haven’t depreciated the land and the wells necessary to obtain it, that’s basically the end game.”


CCME: Few Signs of Life at 'Healthy' Chinese Firm

* Editor's Note: This story has been republished with permission from The Financial Investigator. To access the original article, complete with links to back-up documents, click here.

In the maze of thronged and narrow streets that makes up Fujian province’s capital city of Fuzhou, a deft driver, if he’s willing–as all Chinese drivers apparently are–to nearly kill or injure vast numbers of his countrymen can take you to the foot of Dongjie street. There was little reason to be there save for its having the headquarters of a company called China MediaExpress Holdings (Nasdaq: CCME), an enterprise that seems to be able to weather allegations about its business that would have forced the share price collapse of a company five times its size. The attention of bulls and bears is not misplaced: In a mere four years as a public company, it has apparently come to dominate the ad placement market for leading multinational consumer products companies on a network of what it claims is more than 27,000 buses on Chinese airport and intercity routes.

Also, and this cannot be understated, hanging out on a sidewalk in Fujian–the sidewalks double as parking spots when the streets, which appeared to have been designed in the Han Dynasty, fill up–was not a viable option. There was also the matter of the world-class headache the Financial Investigator was developing from Fuzhou’s diabolical smell, an epic conflation of poor sewage treatment, air pollution and the smell of cabbage that made getting the hell off Dongjie street a matter of vital importance.

The Financial Investigator and his traveling companion for the trip, an American investor with extensive experience in China, decided to head upstairs despite our interview with the CFO having been cancelled at the last minute (with no explanation given.) We thought a quick tour of the offices and meeting a few other executives might open our eyes to a few things.

It did.

Though the language barrier was a little steep with the young receptionist–when we asked for writing paper, she provided Kleenex–we were in short order shown to their conference room and told to wait. It did not escape notice that pride of place in the conference room belonged to a framed certificate of participation from the Fall 2010 Rodman & Renshaw conference, the World Cup for reverse merger companies and the pumpers and touts who peddle them.

Eventually chief operating officer James Yu came down and after spending 30 minutes trying to understand who we were, concluded that giving us a tour wouldn’t hurt. Soon enough, his colleague, Vinne Ye–the chairman’s assistant–came out and took us around.

It was most eye-opening.


IBIO: Time for a Painful Shot of Reality

For investors betting on iBio (AMEX: IBIO), a bleeding vaccine developer formerly owned by a penny-stock company with a history of self-dealing, the future could soon deliver a powerful dose of pain.

Originally spawned by Integrated Biopharma (OTC: INBP.OB), an obscure vitamin seller that currently trades for less than 20 cents a share, IBIO has seen its own stock rocket from 55 cents to a high of $6 during its past 12 months as a stand-alone company. To critics who have followed both companies for years, however, IBIO looks a lot less healthy than its current share price.

First and perhaps foremost, they say, IBIO faces a looming secondary offering that will allow holders of low-priced stock – including a tainted brokerage house with a buy rating on the name – to cash in huge gains on millions of cheap shares. By increasing IBIO’s share count by 45%, they note, that offering alone could slash the company’s stock price by almost half. But even without the threat of massive dilution, they say, IBIO looks like a grossly overvalued company that resembles its former parent far more than it does a promising biotech play.

To be sure, corporate filings show, IBIO and INBP share plenty of common traits. For starters, both companies employ CEOs from the same family. Robert B. Kay runs IBIO, while his brother E. Gerald Kay runs INBP and founded the original corporation (Chem International) that launched those intertwined firms. IBIO also counts Gerald Kay and his two daughters, INBP Executive Vice Presidents Christina Kay and Riva Sheppard, among the company’s largest shareholders. In fact, regulatory filings show, those INBP insiders boast larger stakes in IBIO than the company’s own CEO does. 

All told, IBIO’s latest proxy statement shows, INBP insiders presently control more than half of IBIO’s outstanding shares.


Cougar Oil & Gas: Ready for a Bloodbath?

Despite the bullish claims -- and the wild price targets – showcased in paid promotions for Cougar Oil & Gas Canada (OTC: COUGF.OB), the company cannot overcome the powerful forces of reality. In short, the hype looks a whole lot prettier than the following ugly facts.

COUGF has recorded no significant changes in its oil production over the course of the past year, while the company’s stock has inexplicably tripled in price during that same period. Nevertheless, COUGF promoters – hired as part of a massive six-figure publicity campaign -- have issued price targets that call for the stock to rocket even higher, soaring as much as 1,000% or more, despite the speculative gains it has already enjoyed. 

Without those promotions, COUGF looks like an odd candidate for such a breathless rally. For starters, COUGF is actually owned by another company that has been operating at a deficit for years and needs emergency financing in order to survive. Moreover, COUGF itself is a cash-starved company that plans to use dilutive equity-based financing to cover its own business expenses going forward.

Given that troubling set of facts, TheStreetSweeper offers these words of caution: If you have purchased COUGF shares (or considered doing so), you should first determine just how much that investment is really worth. It just may be a little less than the $7.25 -- or the even higher $62 -- price target you saw on the promotional tout sheet that landed in your mailbox. 


L&L Energy: Could This Hot Stock Go up in Smoke?

L&L Energy (Nasdaq: LLEN), a relatively new Chinese coal miner accused of misleading investors in the past, has managed to become a stock-market winner by posting some of the most incredible numbers recorded in the entire industry.

Just a few years after reinventing itself as a Chinese coal-mining company, L&L currently boasts higher margins than virtually any player – including Chinese giant Yanzhou Coal Mining (NYSE: YZC) and U.S. veteran Peabody Energy(NYSE: BTU) – in the red-hot sector. L&L also touts a remarkable growth rate, filings show, with revenue soaring from $23.4 million to $109 million -- and profits skyrocketing from less than $1 million to $32.9 million -- over the course of two short years.

In other words, those numbers suggest, L&L has managed to pull off an outright miracle. 

Under the leadership of founder and current CEO Dickson Lee, an accountant and tainted ex-broker with no obvious coal-mining experience, L&L has spent the past few years buying cheap Chinese coal mines and then somehow transforming them into lucrative money-making machines. L&L paid just $4 million last year for the newest of its three coal mines, for example, and then released pro forma numbers suggesting that the mine – which posted a meager $362,545 profit the year before its sale – would have delivered more than $8 million in 2010 profits if the company had overseen its operations for all (rather than just half) of that fiscal year. If so, L&L struck quite a bargain by paying less than 0.5 times future earnings – in a sizzling industry with generous price-to-earnings ratios – for that valuable coal mine.

The company, based in Seattle despite its Chinese focus, worked similar wonders with its first two coal mines as well. In public statements, however, the company has offered a rather simple – and incredibly vague -- reason for that success. 


HHWW: Another Hyped-Up Stock That's Dressed to Kill?

The corporate headquarters for Horiyoshi Worldwide (OTC: HHWW.OB), located within blocks of several Los Angeles homeless shelters servicing Skid Row, looks rather modest for a high-end fashion company that recently sported a market value approaching $200 million.

Earlier this month, TheStreetSweeper sent some locals to HHWW’s home office after watching the company’s stock rocket from $1 to $3 a share on a blizzard of paid promotions. They found a tiny operation, manned by a single staffer (focused on investor relations), that housed little more than two clothing racks containing about 20 T-shirts apiece.

Based on prices supplied in HHWW’s regulatory filings, those T-shirts represent an estimated $6,000 worth of inventory for the company. While meager, that figure nevertheless eclipses the $912 in total sales reported by HHWWfor the second quarter of this year.

To be fair, HHWW has yet to release third-quarter results that might reflect an uptick in sales following the company’s adoption of an aggressive growth strategy. Still, corporate filings show, HHWW actually saw its quarterly revenue plummet – sinking from $152,175 to less than $1,000 – in the months leading up to that grand plan. 

Even so, stock promoters – paid huge sums to tout HHWW – have painted an incredibly rosy picture of the company. Last month, for example, Eric Dickson of Breakaway Stocks predicted that HHWW could soar more than 4,500% by the end of this year. The stock, currently trading at $1.63, must somehow find a way to reach $45.38 a share over the next few days for that wild forecast to come true.


Regulators Turn up the Heat on Alternate Energy

Two months after TheStreetSweeper began sounding alarms about Alternate Energy (OTC: AEHI.PK), federal regulators have officially filed charges against the company and two of its officers for allegedly fleecing investors through a long-running pump-and-dump scheme.

In a formal complaint this week, issued just days after halting AEHI’s stock, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission flatly accused the company and two senior executives – CEO Donald Gillispie and his girlfriend Vice President Jennifer Ransom – of scamming investors while secretly enriching themselves. Since it went public four years ago, the SEC says, AEHI has raised millions of dollars by promising to build a nuclear power plant even though the company has “no realistic possibility” of ever achieving that goal. Meanwhile, the SEC says, AEHI insiders have quietly dumped big chunks of stock while publicly expressing strong confidence in the company.

“The company has made multiple misrepresentations, including claims that its executives had such confidence in AEHI that they had not sold a single share of company stock,” the SEC stated on Thursday. However, “records obtained by the SEC show that Gillispie and Ransom have instead secretly unloaded extensive stock holdings and funneled the money back to Gillispie.”

According to the SEC, both Gillispie and Ransom have sold at least 1 million shares of AEHI stock through secret accounts and then used the money for “lavish personal expenses.” With Gillispie paying stock promoters to manipulate AEHI, the SEC claims, the defendants managed to cash in their shares at artificially high prices.


Regulators Pull the Plug on Alternate Energy

Four years after Alternate Energy (OTC: AEHI.PK) went public, courting investors with grand plans to build a multibillion-dollar nuclear power plant, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has finally suspended trading in the controversial penny stock.

This week, the SEC halted AEHI due to questions about “the accuracy and adequacy of publicly disseminated information” about the company. When cracking down on AEHI, the SEC cited concerns about several issues – including company finances, executive compensation and insider sales – examined by TheStreetSweeper in its recent coverage of the company. (Click on these three links to access those stories and the backup documents used to prepare them.)

AEHI critics, who have been sounding alarms about the company for years, expressed clear relief at the long-awaited news.

“It was a scam from the beginning,” declared Joe Weatherby, a former planning and zoning commissioner in AEHI’s home base of Idaho. “This has been a long time in coming.

“I didn’t think it was ever going to happen,” he added. “So it was a great Christmas present.” 


Can CyberDefender Protect Itself from a Crash?

CyberDefender (Nasdaq: CYDE), the company behind such controversial computer-security programs as and, has created quite a mess.

Last month, CyberDefender disclosed plans to reverse a suspect accounting practice that – for a brief, but crucial, period – allowed the company to look like a profitable operation. Thanks to that accounting change, which improperly slashed CyberDefender’s advertising expenses, the company managed to report its first-ever pretax profit just months before securing a coveted listing on the Nasdaq exchange.

The stock remained strong, always commanding at least the $4 minimum bid required by Nasdaq, ahead of its mid-2010 move from the OTC Bulletin Board to the larger exchange. It fell below that $4 threshold less than three weeks later, however, and has largely traded below that price ever since. Down 2 cents on Wednesday, following a delisting threat from Nasdaq, the thinly traded stock currently fetches $3.29 a share. 

The only analyst who covers CyberDefender, James Ragan of Crowell Weedon, still has a buy rating and an $8 price target on the company’s stock. His forecasts have so far proven wildly optimistic, however, and continue to bank on future profits – subject to massive dilution and dependant upon drastic improvements in the company’s shrinking margins and dismal renewal rates – that now seem hopelessly elusive to some. Far from objective, he also stands to benefit from his bullish call since he owns stock in the company himself.

In contrast, skeptics view CyberDefender as a dubious company that should have never escaped from the penny-stock arena at all. They portray CyberDefender’s computer-protection service as an outright scam, unable to compete with popular software sold by giant rivals McAfee (NYSE: MFE) and Symantec (Nasdaq: SYMC), and attribute the company’s eye-popping growth to sensational advertising – costing more than the revenue that it ultimately generates – rather than legitimate demand for its products.  


Suntech Power Burns Investors Once Again

Last week, Suntech Power (NYSE: STP) burned investors with disappointing quarterly results that – while bad enough – look even worse under the glare of a powerful spotlight.

The giant solar company needed major help from a notorious related-party deal, first scrutinized in detail byTheStreetSweeper six months ago, just to post third-quarter profits that even approached Wall Street expectations. Technically, the company reported a profit of 18 cents a share that fell a full nickel short of the consensus estimate. However, critics note, without the generous new value assigned to solar projects recently completed by the Global Solar Fund (GSR) – a firm 97% owned by Suntech and its CEO – the company would have generated a much tinier profit of just 6 cents a share instead.

Axiom Capital analyst Gordon Johnson, a longtime Suntech bear, refused to include that handy benefit in the company’s results when reiterating his latest call for investors to sell the volatile stock. Johnson presented a compelling argument, as summarized below, while stating his case against the company.


Alternate Energy: Another Radioactive Stock Pick?

Alternate Energy (OTC: AEHI.PK) investors might want to take a closer look at some of the outfits that have embraced the company’s stock.

Just last month, two different firms – both known for risky microcap picks -- rushed to defend AEHI with bullish recommendations after TheStreetSweeper raised legitimate concerns about the company. The first one, Pinnacle Digest, owns AEHI’s stock and admitted in a disclaimer that it plans to “sell every share” for its own profit without advance notice to its followers. The second one,, regularly collects cash and/or stock from the companies it endorses and has directed investors into some notorious losers along the way.

Years ago, for example, WallStreetCorner’s Larry Oakley touted a company known as Accident Prevention Plus that served as the vehicle for an illegal pump-and-dump scheme. The so-called “mastermind” behind that scam wound up sentenced to 10 years in prison last month – just three days before Oakley issued his ringing endorsement of AEHI – as punishment for his crimes.

Oakley has embraced other ill-fated stocks, such as eMax Holdings (OTC: EMXC.PK) and Hathaway Corporation, as well. In certain ways, AEHI now resembles both of those doomed companies.


AEHI: The Story, the Holes and the Secrets They Hide

Alternate Energy (OTC: AEHI.PK) has spent the past four years selling investors an incredible – if incomplete – story.

The basic plotline goes something like this: AEHI will somehow secure the funding and approval necessary to build a multibillion-dollar nuclear power plant in Idaho that’s virtually guaranteed to deliver eye-popping profits for investors. That version of the story contains some gaping holes, however, filled with pesky secrets that threaten to ruin this fairy-tale ending.

Take the first chapter in this ongoing saga, just for starters. Initially, AEHI CEO Donald Gillispie said the company would build its nuclear power plant in Owyhee County – touting a deal inked with “prominent Idaho landowner and businessman” James Hilliard -- and spent the next year portraying that site as a suitable location for such a project. In the spring of 2008, however, AEHI suddenly announced that it had abandoned that site due to troubling fault lines and shifted the project to nearby Elmore County instead.

In a sworn deposition that surfaced last month, however, Gillispie offered far different reasons for that abrupt change of plans.

“There were two things going on,” he states in that document. “First of all, we had not received funding because we lost our silent partner there … The other thing going on was that Hilliard would not – he had been extending the contract whenever it came up, like a six-month contract – and in early ’08, he didn’t extend it.”

more... CFO Pulls a Vanishing Act

Last week, (Nasdaq: LOCM) CFO Brenda Agius suddenly vacated her post just after the company pre-announced another blockbuster quarter that would soon require her to certify the accuracy of those financial results.

The news came as a surprise to many, since Local seemed to magically flourish with Agius in charge of its numbers. The company reported a string of record quarters, pushing its stock from $1.60 to almost $9 a share, during her first 14 months on the job. The stock began to lose steam after that time, however, and ultimately suffered a massive hit whenTheStreetSweeper raised questions about Local in general – and Agius in particular – a couple of months ago.

For its part, Local has chosen to downplay the abrupt departure of its top finance executive. In a press release issued after the market closed last Tuesday, the California-based Internet company stated that Agius had left for “personal reasons” so that she could be near her new husband on the East Coast. Moreover, Local stated in its official corporate filings that her “separation from the company is not as a result of any disagreement with the company, its management or its auditors.”

But Local actually terminated Agius – while at least suggesting that she left willingly – just six months after renewing her annual contract, those records show, and promised her a generous severance package if she signed a confidentiality agreement that would prevent her from sharing information about the company.


Rare Element Resources: Formula for Disaster?

* Editor's Note: This column has been republished with permission from the "Shareholder Watchdog." To access the original article, complete with graphics and links to backup documents, click here.

We have witnessed a fair share of bubbles over the past 15 years: Internet stocks, housing, crude oil, and Chinese stocks. We have had some success in identifying "bubbles" in individual stocks and warning the investment community about specific issues (including HUSA at $20.35 and PCBC at $5.11). Possibly the most voracious bubble in recent memory is occurring with Rare Earth element ("RE" or "RE element") stocks. We have done some work framing the opportunities and risks within the RE element space. After sifting through the hype, we believe there is tremendous risk in RE stocks and highlight Rare Element Resources (AMEX: REE) as a potential short opportunity, or at least as a stock investors should avoid.

Rare Element is a Canada-based company that owns the Bear Lodge mine located in the northeastern corner of Wyoming. The stock price is up more than 500% since early July and more than 65% in the past three days. With the euphoria of the strong move in RE element stocks, speculators have bought first and asked questions later. We believe Rare Element investors will wish they had conducted more diligence before piling into a company with a potentially worthless plot of land. We believe Rare Element is a heavily promoted stock with questionable management and massive risks to a business plan that, under the rosiest scenario, will not be at full production until 2015 or 2016. By that time, we expect the world could suffer from a glut of RE supplies. As a result, we believe current investors face at least 70% downside from current levels.


SMED: The Band-Aid That Looked Like a Miracle Cure

Sharps Compliance (Nasdaq: SMED) investors have paid a high price for the stock they purchased from company insiders – who scored millions from their well-timed transactions – less than a year ago.

Until early 2009, when the company secured an incredibly generous contract from the federal government, Sharps toiled in relative obscurity as a tiny outfit specializing in the disposal of used syringes and other medical waste. The company, long overshadowed by much larger players such as Waste Management (NYSE: WM) and Stericycle (Nasdaq: SRCL), was reporting meager profits – after years of posting steady losses – and trading on the lowly OTC Bulletin Board before scoring its lucrative government deal. Once it landed that $40 million contract, however, Sharps soon became ahighly profitable company with massive operating margins that dwarfed those generated by its giant rivals in the fiercely competitive industry.

Sharps inked that mysterious deal, awarded outside the traditional competitive bidding process, with apparent help from some well-placed government veterans. Steven Bice spent years as a high-ranking official at the Centers for Disease Control, the source of that high-margin contract, before joining Sharps (where another powerful CDC alum already served as a consultant) as the company’s vice president of government relations.

“We were working on that contract for a long time,” Sharps spokesperson Deborah Pawlowski told TheStreetSweeperthis week. But “we didn’t have it signed when (Bice) started with us … He was with us a year or so before that.”

Sharps never revealed that Bice had joined its executive team, even though he boasts the sort of impressive credentials – including a national Homeland Security Award – that most small companies love to tout. Bice carries a permanent stain on his record, however, due to a felony conviction that resulted from his involvement in a high-profile government corruption case almost two decades ago.


RMCP: The Tiny Syringe Maker Stings Investors Again

* Editor’s Note: TheStreetSweeper first began uncovering risks at RMCP when the stock hit its peak last week. Because RMCP crashed before TheStreetSweeper could write and fact-check this investigative report – with the stock plunging another 25% after the company was emailed questions for this story – TheStreetSweeper will begin sending out early alerts about risky penny stocks that it plans to cover in the future. 

Less than four years after changing its name in an effort to put its checkered past behind it, Revolutions Medical (OTC:RMCP.OB) is suspected of engaging in the same sort of stock-boosting activities that led regulators to crack down on the company in the first place.

Ever since RMCP filed the paperwork last month to clear the way for massive sales of its stock, the company has been issuing a flurry of press releases containing increasingly upbeat news. RMCP kicked things off with a couple of announcements about its MRI technology in mid-August, which proved effective enough to push the company’s stockfrom 28 cents to 40 cents a share. When RMCP shifted its attention to the company’s new “safety syringes,” however, the stock really started to fly. By Sept. 13 – less than a month after RMCP began churning out its steady stream of good news – the briskly trading stock had soared to an all-time high of $1.74 a share.

Three announcements, issued over a one-week span this month, fueled most of that surge.

The first two celebrated a manufacturing deal, calling for the production of 5 million safety syringes, inked with an obscure firm led by an apparent insider of the company itself. (As noted in more detail below, that firm does not seem to exist.) The third, even more powerful, announcement hinted at a looming syringe order from none other than the federal government.

With RMCP plummeting back below $1 last week, however, some investors clearly wonder – perhaps with good reason -- if those deals will turn out to be real. After all, Internet records show, RMCP announced a similar manufacturing deal for its syringes years ago but has never generated 1 cent of revenue since that time. Moreover, despite its recent announcement, RMCP has apparently yet to land a formal order from the federal government. 


The Complicated Math Lesson Taught by InterOil

* Editor’s Note: This story has been republished with permission from To access the original article, complete with links to numerous backup documents, click here.

In the world of finance theory, a company’s credible suggestion that it is being forced to raise cash at exorbitant rates – or that it is valuing its assets sharply below where the market has valued them – traditionally means a death sentence for the company’s stock price. The reasons for this are straightforward enough: Investors hate desperation, but not as much as they hate making an asset play and being wrong on the value of the assets.

Then there is InterOil (NYSE: IOC).

An international oil and gas producer that has been touting a potentially epic find in the wilds of Papua New Guinea for more than a decade, InterOil recently raised cash at exorbitant rates and appears to be internally valuing its assets well below what the market appears to think they are worth. Yet all is well in the share-price department.



Internet Brands: Deal-Maker or Deal-Breaker?

These days, Internet Brands (Nasdaq: INET) may have reason to worry about its own brand name.

In recent years, company filings show, INET has spent huge sums of money acquiring websites in an effort to bolster its growth. But the former owners of two of those websites – including one that accounts for a major chunk of INET’s traffic – have accused the company of refusing to fully pay off those strategic deals. Meanwhile, longtime fans of other INET-purchased websites have threatened to leave over rate hikes and reported failures in customer service.

With INET under fire from both its past acquisition targets and its inherited customers, the company could face challenges pursuing its ambitious growth strategy going forward. Moreover, regulatory filings indicate, INET has so far failed to capitalize on the websites it has already bought.


China Sky One Medical Caught in the Eye of a Storm

Hurt by mounting government scrutiny, China Sky One Medical (Nasdaq: CSKI) – once a Wall Street darling – has found itself in a world of incredible pain.

In a press release issued late Friday, when many investors had already left work for the long holiday weekend, CSKI dropped a devastating bombshell. The Chinese pharmaceutical supplier, already a prime target of bears suspicious of its regulatory filings, suddenly slashed its full-year guidance as its own distributors attempt to distance themselves from the controversial company. Specifically, CSKI revealed that it will fall well short of revenue and profit targets for 2010 because “several major distributors” had severed ties with the company – the subject of a formal investigation by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission – due to unwanted government scrutiny of their own business practices.


Clicker 'Body-Slammed' after Tout by Pro Wrestler

Shawn Ambrosino may have retired from professional wrestling, but as a penny stock promoter – touting the likes of Clicker (OTC: CLKZ.OB), Clenergen (OTC: CRGE.OB) and Enhance Skin Products (OTC: EHSK.OB) – he can still inflict an awful lot of pain.

This month, Ambrosino delivered his latest knockout blow with a powerful recommendation of CLKZ that has since left investors reeling. With CLKZ sitting at $1 a share, Ambrosino urged investors to buy the stock before it surged past $20 as the company – a cash-poor outfit with just a handful of employees – conquered Craigslist to become the new heavyweight leader of the online classified advertising world. CLKZ did march higher on that paid tout, ultimately reaching $1.37 a share on Wednesday, but never approached even Ambrosino’s $5 short-term target before staging a remarkable collapse.

The stock, hammered by a sudden selling spree that began the same day it peaked, now fetches just 53 cents a share. Even at that lower price, however, CLKZ still boasts a market value of $31.2 million that looks rather lofty for a company that – just six weeks ago – cautioned that it lacked the funds necessary to finance its operations for more than 30 days.


Tradeshow, Skymark Kicked off the Stage

Canadian regulators aren’t buying the story that Tradeshow Marketing (OTC: TSHO.PK) and Skymark Research – a paid promoter led by the son of TSHO’s founder – tried so hard to sell.

The Alberta Securities Commission has issued a cease-trading order for TSHO’s stock, while banning Skymark from trading or recommending any securities, after uncovering tell-tale signs of a classic pump-and-dump scheme. When explaining its move on Monday, the ASC cited concerns originally raised by TheStreetSweeper in a detailed investigative report almost six months ago. (Click here for the original story, complete with links to backup documents.)

Specifically, the ASC claimed that TSHO had soared on bullish Skymark forecasts secretly generated by relatives connected to the company. The ASC also noted that John Kirk, the sole director of Skymark and the son of TSHO’s founder, “held a significant number of shares” in the company – as did TSHO founder Bruce Kirk himself – at the time of the stock-boosting promotions. It pointed out that Ben Kirk, another son of the founder, worked for Skymark during the publicity campaign as well.


Liqiudmetal: Keeping Mum about Apple and Far More

This year, Liquidmetal Technologies (OTC: LQMT.PK) has kept some telling – and arguably material – secrets from its investors.

Take LQMT’s recent deal with Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL) as an obvious example. In a cryptic 8-K filing on Aug. 9, LQMT suddenly announced a contract with Apple that – on the surface – seemed to warrant a full-blown press release. Specifically, LQMT revealed that it had signed a “master transaction agreement” that would allow Apple to commercialize its technology for future use in its consumer electronics products.

LQMT never disclosed the terms of that licensing contract, however, allowing hopeful speculation to fuel the company’s shares instead. LQMT’s stock, which fetched just 13 cents a share a month ago, rocketed to a multiyear highof $1.76 last week before swiftly crashing on the lack of details associated with that high-profile deal. The stock, down another 10.6% on Wednesday, has now lost most of its Apple-related gains and currently trades for just 76 cents a share.

This spring, in the months leading up to that dramatic deal, LQMT kept quiet about another important development as well. In an even shorter 8-K filing on March 8, LQMT quietly disclosed that longtime Chairman John Kang had left the company without giving any reason for his departure. One week earlier, Kang was convicted at trial on fraud charges – carrying a potential five-year prison sentence – for inflating the financial results of another company he had previously led.

more... Rolls the Dice on Another Troubling Deal (Nasdaq: LOCM) better hope that investors don’t start using Google (Nasdaq: GOOG), its far more powerful rival, to search for information about the last company it acquired.

Last month, Local agreed to pay $5 million -- plus another $5.9 million in potential earn-out bonuses -- for a startup technology company that provides “domain-based local advertising solutions” to small business customers. When announcing that transaction, which looks rather extravagant for a company that’s recorded net losses for the past five years, Local identified its buyout target as Octane360 and the firm’s leader as Adam Rioux. Local only later revealed in an official 8-K filing that it had actually purchased Simply Static, doing business as Octane360, a company co-founded by Rioux and a second man by the name of Mark Roah.

Local may have buried this information for a reason. In 2003, Roah agreed to plead guilty to criminal charges for artificially inflating the revenue at L90 – an Internet firm where he served as senior vice president of business development – and another web-based company called According to Internet records, Roah received a one-year prison sentence, followed by three years of supervised release, as punishment for those crimes. A man with the same name and age as Roah served time in federal prison, an official database shows, regaining his freedom less than three years ago.


Has Moved into a Bad Neighborhood? (Nasdaq: LOCM) investors might want to take a closer look at corporate insiders and the recent deals they’ve inked in order to boost the company’s growth.

CEO Heath Clarke has issued bullish projections, lifted by aggressive acquisitions of website customers, and thendumped almost half of his stock in the company. CFO Brenda Agius has been placed in charge of finances even though her past experience at that post, racked up at former Internet highflier, ended in disaster for investors. Moreover, one of the company’s directors has worked as an investment banker at several firms – including two with connections to a shady penny-stock outfit known as SpongeTech (SPNG.PK) – that have left stains on his record as well.

Meanwhile, in an effort to expand beyond its core Internet search-engine business, Local has been acquiring customers from companies with some black marks of their own. Local purchased most of those subscribers from LaRoss Partners, a firm that appears to be led by a past target of securities regulators with links to two Internet businesses accused of billing customers for website hosting services they never ordered. It has acquired the rest of its subscribers from LiveDeal (Nasdaq: LIVE), a company with an “F” rating by the Better Business Bureau due to massive customer complaints.


TheStreetSweeper Helps Investors Escape Massive Losses

As a former investigative reporter for, a popular financial news site founded by Jim Cramer of “Mad Money” fame, I am keenly aware of the risks involved with keeping score when it comes to stock-related calls.

Cramer raked in millions during his past life as a hedge fund manager, but he has still made mistakes – and suffered withering criticism – as a celebrity stock picker willing to make his calls in public. He cannot avoid offering at least some bad tips, given the unpredictable nature of the stock market, and he cannot avoid taking some real heat when that inevitably happens.

With this in mind, I was initially hesitant to track the performance of stocks we cover here at TheStreetSweeper. We focus on exposing risky stocks that look poised for massive losses, after all, in a broader market that typically delivers consistent gains instead. To me, it seemed, we would be working without gravity – or even luck – on our side.

That was nine months ago. Remarkably, as the official "Stock Report" to the right shows, we have gone on to achieve a near-perfect track record since that time. (At the end of last week, Suntech -- which rebounded this month from a steep decline – stood out as the sole gainer in the pack.) Even better, we have helped our readers escape more than $2 billion worth of stock-related losses along the way.


AIG and Goldman Sachs: The Deceptive Blame Game

* Editor's Note: This story has been republished with permission from To access the original article, complete with links to backup documents, click here

The Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission’s document release last week offered no answer to a question that has received little play since AIG’s (NYSE: AIG) collapse almost two years ago. 

The question is this: “How did AIG really collapse?” It is not: “How did the company get in trouble?” Nor is it this: “Who is to blame?”

Rather, the curious still want to know: What led a firm with a AA rating, around $160 billion in market value and $14 billion in profits – with real cash-generation capacity to boot – in fiscal 2006 to effectively go out of business two years later? The answer is not Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS).


Ecosphere: A Clean Energy Company with a Dirty CEO?

Either Ecosphere Technology (OTC: ESPH.OBCEO Dennis E. McGuire simply shares a lot in common with a twice-convicted drug felon – a coincidence of remarkable proportions – or he is the former jailbird himself.

Based on public records and news stories gathered by TheStreetSweeper, supplemented with a 63-page personal background report, the CEO and the ex-con look very much the same.  The names and birth dates match. The names of multiple relatives come up as matches, too. Other key identifying traits – including addresses, business ties and even partial social security numbers – correspond as well.

McGuire’s original corporate bio, published in regulatory filings, hints at further parallels. That bio begins when McGuire graduated from community college in 1974 and, following a long and unexplained hole, picks up in detail when he invented his first cleaning technology (armed with a mere associate’s degree) more than 15 years later. The mysterious gap in between corresponds with the very period when the convicted McGuire operated a drug business, news reports show, and twice served time in jail.


DLR: Reading between the Lines for Signs of Risk

* Editor's Note: This article has been republished with permission from To access the original story, complete with links to numerous backup documents, click here.

After the high tides of the dot-com era receded, revealing that many companies – from a corporate governance standpoint – had been “swimming naked,” the mantra among corporate general counsels has been “full disclosure.” 

As corporate bromides go, this is a palatable one. Among other things, it provides that investors be given all available information on the relationships between a corporation’s officers and directors and the companies they do business with. But that is not to say it’s perfect.

For example, an investor reading Fannie Mae’s 2003 proxy statement would, around page 30, discover this: Ken Duberstein, a board member and Republican political arm twister, had spent the previous 11 years providing “consulting services” to the company, with his most recent fees totaling $375,000. Yet, when the deluge came in 2004, investors seemed totally caught off guard.

This brings to mind Digital Realty Trust (NYSE: DLR), a San Francisco company that has been a darling of Wall Street for some time now.


PennyStockChaser Fails to Outrun the SEC

PennyStockChaser, a promotional website that caught the attention of TheStreetSweeper seven months ago with its breathless recommendations of dubious microcap companies, cannot run away from government authorities any more.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission cracked down on PennyStockChaser this week, filing charges against the website, its two owners – Carol McKeown and Dan Ryan – and two investment firms under their control. In its formal complaint, the SEC accused the defendants of “clandestinely selling millions of shares” in the same stocks that it was urging investors to buy. All told, the SEC estimates, the defendants pocketed at least $2.4 million from their so-called stock-scalping scheme.


Houston American: How Slick Can This Oil Company Be?

* Editor's Note: This story has been partially republished with permission from To access the full article, complete with links to backup documents, click here.

Both of the oil companies that John F. Terwilliger ran before he became founder, chairman and chief executive of Houston American Energy Corp. (Nasdaq: HUSA) wound up in bankruptcy.

An oilfield services company headed by one of Houston American's directors, John P. Boylan, also went under, in part because he took hundreds of thousands of dollars in loans from the business without the knowledge or consent of his partners.

A third member of Houston American's five-person board, Edwin C. Broun III, was described in court documents last year as suffering from alcohol-related brain damage that could affect his ability to "process information and make sound decisions." The filing, submitted in his defense, characterized him as a recluse who slept all day, drank all night and hadn't opened his mail in two years.


Why Can't Ecosphere Score a Deal with BP?

Maybe Ecosphere Technologies (OTC: ESPH.OB) should have added Kevin Costner, the celebrity backer of a competing water-treatment device, to its star-studded team.

Despite ringing endorsements from its own superstars – including a big-name environmentalist and two retired professional athletes – ESPH has so far failed to secure an order from BP (NYSE: BP) for machines that, it says, can effectively address the company’s massive oil spill. Costner’s company, Ocean Therapy Solutions, fielded an order from BP for 32 of its machines almost two full weeks ago. ESPH is still waiting on an order, however, even though the company claims that it offers a superior device.


CGA and CSKI: Lost in Translation?

* Editor's Note: This article has been republished with permission from To access the original article, complete with links to numerous backup documents, click here.

In ancient tales, a royal court’s scientific elite could conjure “The Elixir of Life,” a potion made from white gold, a few drops of which could restore youth eternally. You could be forgiven for thinking that society’s command of inorganic chemistry has progressed somewhat, consigning such stories to the dusty realms of explanatory myth.

Not so fast.

The continued prominence of a pair of Chinese reverse-merger companies, China Green Agriculture (NYSE: CGA) and China Sky One Medical (Nasdaq: CSKI), is evidence that investment returns can be had from thin air.

Dick Fuld: From Wall Street Highs to Penny Stock Lows

* Editor's Note: This article has been republished with permission from To access the original article, complete with links to numerous backup documents, click here.

When he was CEO of Lehman Brothers, Dick Fuld oversaw a host of capital markets staff that underwrote stock and bond sales for the likes of Wal-Mart and General Electric. Bankers advised municipalities on interest-rate exposure, corporations on mergers and foreign governments on divestment. Entire divisions serviced the business and capital-raising needs of hedge-fund and private-equity clients. Legions of sales and trading staff talked hourly to every major investor in the world from the firm’s cavernous trading floors at 745 Seventh Ave.

There were benefits to this beyond the likely $500 million in compensation Fuld booked between 2000-2007 (although that did help in acquiring some trophies). All agree that he wore his reputation like a glove.


Suntech Power Still Seeking Shelter from the Storm

Last week, Suntech Power (NYSE: STP) tried – but failed – to please the market by presenting its latest results in the best possible light.

Yes, Suntech beat revenue expectations for the first quarter and even raised its production outlook for the rest of the year. But the company also encountered multiple headwinds that left investors in a rather dark mood.

As expected, Suntech suffered a big hit from the falling Euro that triggered a rare earnings miss. Even worse, the company reported glitches with the breakthrough technology that’s supposed to fuel its future sales. Meanwhile, the company still hasn’t collected the cash for deals inked by the Global Solar Fund (GSF) – a mysterious firm that it largely controls – more than a year ago. 


SpongeTech: The Dirty Mess It Left Behind

* Editor's Note: This article has been republished with permission from To access the original story, complete with links to numerous backup documents, click here.

As a reporter who investigated the archipelago of lies, deceptions and frauds that was the world of a preposterous little venture called SpongeTech Delivery Systems, I felt it reasonable to conclude that after May 5, when the Department of Justice and the Securities and Exchange Commission filed criminal and civil charges against the company’s management, there wouldn’t be much more to report on what was by all lights a classic penny-stock fraud.

That conclusion really needs to be revisited.

SpongeTech was no ordinary pump-and-dump penny-stock scheme; it was, to play off Churchill’s famous definition of Russia, a fraud wrapped in a stock-market rig inside a money-laundering conspiracy.


Junior Mining Companies and the 'Temple of Doom'

Ever since AmeriLithium (OTC: AMEL.OB) purchased some mining assets from GeoXplor -- a Vancouver outfit led by the so-called “Indiana Jones” of the lithium trade -- the company has taken investors on a wild and, at times, thrilling ride. If history repeats itself, however, AMEL investors better not count on a happy ending to their journey.

After all, GeoXplor has sold mineral claims to several other microcap companies that met with rather ugly fates. Even worse, government records show, GeoXplor founder Clive Ashworth has been previously banned from the securities industry for an alleged scam – which resulted in criminal convictions for two stock promoters – involving yet another resource company.

Nevertheless, Ashworth continues to win over junior mining companies and those who promote their risky stocks alike.


Suntech Deals Cast Dark Cloud over Company

For a giant solar company, Suntech (NYSE: STP) sure seems to be keeping its own investors in the dark about some shady-looking deals.

Take Suntech’s massive sales to its majority-owned Global Solar Fund (GSF), for example, which have hung over the company like a dark cloud for almost a year. Thanks to those transactions, which accounted for almost one-third of Suntech’s quarterly revenue at the time, the Chinese company managed to satisfy Wall Street growth expectations and follow up with a secondary stock offering that prevented a potential liquidity crisis. Based on extensive research byTheStreetSweeper, however, Suntech apparently sold those solar products to itself and is still awaiting payment on 95% of the resulting revenue that it booked to this day.


Untangling the Intricate Web Woven by InterOil's CEO

* Editor’s Note: This article has been republished with the permission of iBusiness Reporting. Click here for access to the original story, complete with graphics of back-up documents, and similar investigative reports.

Since Interoil Corp.’s (NYSE: IOC) inception in 1997, CEO Phil Mulacek has made a habit out of doing business with family members and leaving many of the relationships undisclosed.

For instance, during a three-year period ending in 2005, InterOil paid Direct Employment Services Corp. (DESC) nearly $1.8 million for unspecified "services" provided by "executive officers and senior management." InterOil disclosed that 50% of DESC was owned by Christian Vinson, who was serving at the time as InterOil’s COO and a director of the company. 

But InterOil didn't reveal other related-party facts. For starters, Vinson is Mulacek's brother-in-law. Vinson, who has been with InterOil from the beginning, now serves as InterOil’s executive vice president of corporate development and government affairs, a role that places him in charge of dealing with Papua New Guinea's corrupt government.


Putting Together the Puzzle at Big Bear Mining

If Big Bear Mining (OTC: BGBR.OB) would risk hiring a bankrupt CEO with a checkered past to serve as the “public face” of the company – and essentially give him $30 million worth of stock for the favor – then investors might want to search for even darker secrets that the junior gold miner is still trying to keep.

They could start by examining BGBR’s original address. That address, listed in past BGBR regulatory filings as 1728 Yew St. in Vancouver, shows up in filings for several other penny stock outfits as well. Those companies share at least one glaring trait: They count Shane Whittle, a busy Vancouver stock promoter, among their top executives.


Fearing Risks, Big Bear Promoter Tells Investors to Flee

Big Bear Mining (OTC: BGBR.OB) has scared off one of its most powerful fans.

James DiGeorgia, editor of the Gold and Energy Advisor newsletter, this week suddenly reversed his “strong buy” recommendation on BGBR and started urging his followers to sell the stock instead. His abrupt about-face came just one day after The Street Sweeper raised serious questions about BGBR’s true value and the paid promoters – including DiGeorgia himself – who have been touting the heavily traded stock.

“Based on new information I received in the last 24 hours that I was not presented with when I initially reviewed and recommended the stock, I believe it would be in the best interest of any investors holding shares in this company to sell them,” DiGeorgia stated in an official press release on Tuesday. “It doesn’t matter if you’ve made money or lost money holding BGBR.OB. Everyone who has based their purchase of shares on my recommendation should sell their shares.”


Could Big Bear Mining Investors Get Caught in a Trap?

Four years ago, regulatory filings show, Aaron Hall – the founder and largest stockholder of Big Bear Mining (OTC:BGBR.OB) – worked as a security guard at a Vancouver nightclub while dabbling in mineral claims on the side. When BGBR’s stock soared this month on paid promotions, however, the young Canadian suddenly found himself worth $175 million before the company found a single ounce of gold.

If Hall sold his 72-percent stake in BGBR, still valued at $121 million despite a hit to the stock last week, the 33-year-old Canadian could afford to retire right now as a very rich man whether the company ever strikes gold or not. According to BGBR, however, Hall has agreed to walk away from that fortune instead. (BGBR refused to provide Hall’s phone number, so The Street Sweeper could not call him about his decision.)


Are Medifast and Pre-Paid Legal up to the Same Tricks?

Editor's Note: This report was originally published by the Fraud Discovery Institute, which can be accessed at

With Pre-Paid Legal Services (NYSE: PPD) receiving yet another subpoena from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission last week, the Fraud Discovery Institute (FDI) reveals the points of similarity existing in the compensation plans of both Pre-Paid Legal and Medifast (NYSE: MED). 

How long until Medifast receives similar law enforcement scrutiny for a business model built upon a pyramid scheme? 

"Sixty-one percent of Medifast’s total revenue is derived from Take Shape for Life, the company’s multi-level marketing division,” says Barry Minkow, co-founder of FDI. “Since both Pre-Paid Legal and Medifast must rely heavily on their multilevel marketing pie-in-the-sky compensation structure in order to lure in new recruits, it is critical for Wall Street investors and analysts to factor in what legal issues Medifast might be facing. And these similarities are striking." 

MSEH: The Secrets behind Pataki's Favorite Penny Stock

* Editor's Note: This article has been republished, in part, with the permission of Click here to access the entire story and similar investigative reports on other publicly traded companies.

Mesa Energy Inc. was already a publicly traded company when it did a reverse merger with a second one, a shell that began life as Mesquite Mining Inc. 

The unusual deal last August moved Dallas-based Mesa from the Pink Sheets to the Over-the-Counter market and brought it the financing it needed to buy a promising natural gas prospect in western New York, CEO Randy M. Griffin said. 

It also put 14 million cheap -- and free trading -- shares of the combined company, Mesa Energy Holdings Inc.(OTCBB: MSEH.OB), into the hands of four stockholders from the Mesquite Mining side of the transaction. ASharesleuth investigation found that one of them was a limited partnership linked to a convicted felon -- an ex-stockbroker barred from the securities industry for his role in a fraud and manipulation scheme that cost investors more than $100 million. 

Does the NanoLogix Rally Make Any Sense?

The NanoLogix (OTC: NNLX.PK) stock chart featured on a YouTube video – set to the catchy “Money Song” tune from Monty Python – looks rather outdated following this spring’s incredible, if inexplicable, spike in the company’s share price.

When that video first surfaced in the fall of 2007, NNLX was still focused on increasing hydrogen production with the help of grape juice while allowing Nutra Pharma (OTC: NPHC.OB) – the company’s former partner – to pursuebreakthroughs in its current business of diagnostic technology. (NPHC’s own volatile rally, staged late last year, has already come to an end.) Back then, NNLX’s stock had almost doubled in a month but still fetched only 15 cents a share. Since moving into the medical arena and converting a barn-like structure into a “clean room” for producing diagnostic testing kits (with the construction project captured in yet another YouTube video), however, NNLX has seen its stock rocket more than 200% in recent weeks to pass $1 a share.

Even Bret Barnhizer – NanoLogix’s own CEO – cannot explain that move.


With China Tel, Has Tobin Smith Been 'Outfoxed' Again?

Tobin Smith, co-star of Fox News Channel’s popular “Bulls & Bears” investment show, recently declared a challenging new “mission in life.” In an upbeat message to his 2,700-plus followers on Twitter last week, Smith promised to helpChina Tel Group (OTC: CHTL.OB) – a penny stock company he has been touting for months – secure the financing it needs in order to survive.

To be sure, CHTL could use some assistance. More than a year ago, CHTL agreed to pay $195 million for a 49% stake in Chinacomm – an Asian broadband wireless company that ranks as its primary asset – but it still lacks the money required to actually pay for that deal. Although CHTL has inked plenty of financing agreements in the meantime, most recently with two mysterious firms known as Excel Era and the Isaac Organization, the company never seems to collect promised cash from those backers in the end.


Storm of Controversy Continues to Brew over InterOil

* Editor's Note: This article has been republished with the permission of iBusiness Reporting. Click here for access to the original story and similar investigative reports.

The controversy over what the future holds for InterOil (NYSE: IOC) has heated up in recent days, with news surfacingof the bad-faith bankruptcy filed by a company controlled by InterOil CEO Phil Mulacek; wild allegations revealed in a massive fraud lawsuit against Mulacek, InterOil and other companies he controls; published claims that InterOil may be one giant fraud; and a story Monday alleging an InterOil geologist had told his peers the prospects for an InterOil gas discovery in Papua New Guinea were much dimmer than what the company had boasted to Wall Street.


One fact that InterOil fans and skeptics can agree on is this: Mulacek's integrity and business history are critical factors in assessing the company's future success.  more...

InterOil Case Packed with Explosive Bombshells

* Editor's Note: This article has been republished with the permission of iBusiness Reporting. Click here for the original story, complete with excerpts from backup documents, and similar investigative reports.

CONROE, TEXAS -- In the Montgomery County courthouse here, the five-year-old civil fraud case against InterOil Corp. (NYSE: IOC) CEO Phil Mulacek and the companies he controls has generated thousands of pages of legal documents that have been stuffed into three large cardboard boxes.

And sifting through the papers in the Todd Peters et al. v. Phil Mulacek et al. lawsuit, one gets a better sense of why Mulacek attempted a legal Hail Mary three months ago and had one of the companies he controls file for bankruptcy protection, a move Mulacek's attorneys said was calculated to get the Peters' litigation swept into federal bankruptcy court and derail a potentially massive judgment. (See iBusiness Reporting’s original story here.)


Has Atlantic Wind and Solar Been Fueled by Hot Air?

Atlantic Wind and Solar (OTC: AWSL.PK) is suspected of blowing a lot of hot air in an effort to inflate the company’s stock price.

A year ago, AWSL supposedly acquired a 47.5% stake in Hybridyne Power Systems – later touting Hybridyne’s “best-in-class” technology and its access to an expansive research team – for $2 million worth of its own stock. After publicizing a string of stock-boosting projects secured by Hybridyne, however, AWSL suddenly announced this month that it had canceled its acquisition of the company due to an “unfortunate default by the vendor” that rendered the transaction “null and void.”  

Notably, Hybridyne itself now claims that the acquisition never took place at all.


InterOil CEO Slapped for 'Bad Faith' Bankruptcy Filing

* Editor's Note: This article has been republished with permission from iBusiness Reporting. For the original story (including easy access to backup documents) and similar investigative reports, simply click on this link

A company controlled by Phil Mulacek, chief executive officer of InterOil Corp. (NYSE: IOC), filed a "bad-faith" federal bankruptcy in December in an attempt to derail a potentially massive civil judgment in a fraud case against him and companies he controls, according to court documents filed in Houston. 

Less than a month after the filing, federal Judge Marvin Isgur in Houston ruled that Nikiski Partners -- a corporation whose $2 million investment in a used oil refinery gave birth to InterOil -- had filed the bankruptcy in "bad faith." (Read transcript here.) 

Can the Batteries Last on Overcharged Lithium Stocks?

Lithium Corporation (OTC: LTUM.OB) sure looks a whole lot prettier in paid tout sheets than it does in its regulatory filings.

In recent months, stock promoters have treated LTUM – a company with no revenue and just $855 in the bank – like a surefire winner that’s poised to supply giant automakers with the lithium they will need to power tomorrow’s battery-operated cars. The promoters offer similar reasons for their incredible confidence, led by soaring demand for lithium and LTUM’s ready access to lithium mines, while carefully excluding their compensation for touting the stock from its list of key attractions.


Look Again: CSKI Appears to Be Deteriorating Fast

Following a swift decline in sales, China Sky One Medical (Nasdaq: CSKI) is no longer the picture of health that it once seemed to be. 

If CSKI's fourth-quarter results looked weak based on traditional year-over-year comparisons, those numbers look downright painful when examined on a sequential basis. During the last three months of 2009 -- a period when Chinese officials reportedly identified eight CSKI treatments as "counterfeit" drugs and began prohibiting their sale -- the company saw revenue decline, often precipitously, in every one of its product categories.

With a Rare Earnings Miss, CSKI Is Looking Rather Sick

China Sky One Medical (Nasdaq: CSKI) looks like it could use a miracle cure. 

The Chinese pharmaceutical company -- long known for its blowout quarters -- fell well short of Wall Street targets for the latest period and issued disappointing guidance for the upcoming year. The big earnings miss represents the latest in a series of a recent challenges for the company, which has been accused of selling "counterfeit" drugs in China and filing inaccurate financial statements here in the U.S. 

Toreador: The Story behind the Stock's Wild Bull Run

* Click here to start/join a discussion of this article or send tips for future news stories.

Shortly before New York Times reporter Zachery Kouwe resigned for plagiarizing the work of others, he wrote a speculative column about Toreador Resources (Nasdaq: TRGL) that – in an ironic twist -- spawned copycat reports by competing journalists. Those stories, suggesting an imminent buyout of Toreador that failed to materialize, raised some eyebrows even before Kouwe’s public fall from grace.

At the time that Kouwe penned his Jan. 20 “DealBook” column, Toreador desperately needed to raise money for looming debt obligations that could trigger massive payments later on this year. As a small resource company with ambitious plans, Toreador also needed cash to finance an expensive drilling program in Paris – home to its controversial new vice chairman – in order to reinvent itself as a major energy player on the international stage. more...

With Yuhe Losing its Auditor, Could CSKI Be Next?

* Editor's Note: This report has been republished with the permission of its author, Manuel Asensio, an accomplished investor with a track record for spotting possible fraud long before the market itself. Click here to read more of Asensio's research on CSKI and other companies.

Last week, Yuhe International (NASDAQ: YUII) announced in a special 8-K filing that Grant Thornton was "resigning as the company's independent registered public accounting firm effective immediately." Yuhe's stock suffered a one-day plunge of 18% on the news. 

Yuhe is the product of a reverse merger between a private Chinese company and a U.S. shell company completed in March 2008. Yuhe has been listed on the Nasdaq since October, regulatory filings show, with company leaders tapped to ring Nasdaq's opening bell late last year. 

Research published by has focused on two other Chinese reverse mergers: China Sky One Medical(Nasdaq: CSKI) and American Oriental Bioengineering (NYSE: AOB). Moreover, has also published reports on regulatory deficiencies surrounding U.S. listings of questionable Chinese companies -- particularly those that trade on the Nasdaq exchange

CSKI Auditor Accused of Blessing Fuzzy Math

* Editor's Note: This report has been republished with the permission of its author, Manuel Asensio, an accomplished investor with a track record for spotting possible fraud long before the market itself. Click here to read more of Asensio's research on CSKI and other companies.

A private investor has filed a lawsuit against the auditor of China Sky One Medical (NASDAQ: CSKI), alleging "fraudulent misconduct" and violation of securities laws for failing to correct CSKI's "materially false" financial statements.

The complaint states: "MSPC became aware of the fact that the CSKI financial statements were materially false and misleading and its unqualified opinion with respect to them was baseless. Despite becoming aware of these problems, and despite having a duty to correct the information that it knew to be false which had been disseminated into the market via the 10-K, MSPC failed to issue corrected statements or withdraw its support from the CSKI financial statements." more...

Is IMGG's CEO Pulling the Plug on His Company?

* Click here to start/join a discussion of this article or send tips for future news stories.

To some, Imaging3 (OTC: IMGG.OB) CEO Dean Janes appears to be giving up on his own company.

On Feb. 11, exactly one month after IMGG announced the latest in a series of regulatory setbacks, Janes reportedly began pitching a new investment opportunity to his 1,000-plus “friends” on Facebook. In his biggest insider transaction on record, Janes then sold 2.6 million shares of IMGG stock the very next day. more...

Tradeshow Marketing Knows How to Sell Its Stock

Give Tradeshow Marketing (OTC: TSHO.PK) some credit. For a company riddled with so many ugly conflicts, TSHO sure knows how to put on a pretty face for investors.

TSHO can thank SkyMark Research – a promotional firm operated by the apparent son of TSHO’s own founder – for reshaping its public image. For years, TSHO looked like a failed business with limited appeal to even speculative investors willing to place bets on high-risk penny stocks. After SkyMark launched favorable coverage of TSHO late last year, however, the company saw interest in its long-overlooked stock suddenly skyrocket. more...

CSKI Linked to 'Counterfeit' Drugs in China

* Editor's Note: This report has been republished with the permission of its author, Manuel Asensio, an accomplished investor with a track record for spotting possible fraud long before the market itself. Click here to read more of Ansensio's research on CSKI and other companies.

Eight products manufactured by China Sky One Medical (NASDAQ: CSKI) appear in a Chinese government notice of "counterfeit drug products," which states that pharmacies should "immediately stop the sale" of these products.

The government document is titled "Notice of the Ministry of Health of the People's Republic of China," dated November 5, 2009, and is available on the China State Food and Drug Administration website. Click here for the full notice, and click here for a translation. more...

If Genoptix Is So Healthy, Why Are Insiders Selling?

* Click here to start/join a discussion of this article or send tips for future news stories.

Genoptix (Nasdaq: GXDX) CEO Tina Nova keeps sending mixed – and potentially troubling – signals about the value of her company’s stock.

Take Nova’s latest insider sale, for example. On Feb. 3, Nova pocketed more than $500,000 by exercising cheap stock options years before they were formally set to expire. She sold that stock for $31.13 a share – near a four-month low – even though analysts were forecasting a $10 rise in the company’s share price. more...

AENY: Look What's Hiding beneath that Former Shell

* Click here to start/join a discussion of this article or send tips for future news stories.

Americas Energy Company (AENY.OB) exposed some ugly flaws when it emerged from its corporate shell.

Following its heavily hyped reverse merger, AENY now counts CEO Christopher Headrick – a longtime dealmaker with a history of failure – as its sole officer, director and member of its staff. Although AENY has announced plans to expand its senior management team, the company aims to do so by hiring leaders who have benefited handsomely from a series of generous related-party deals. One of those potential executives, already identified as a company vice president in the past, has agreed to plead guilty to felony tax evasion charges and could face up to five years in prison for his crime. more...

AENY: The Plot, the Players and the Shadowy Past

* Click here to start/join a discussion of this article of send tips for future news stories.

Americas Energy Company (AENY.OB) has managed to reinvent itself with backing from a network of long-connected players in the murky world of penny stocks and offshore financing.

Last week, AENY suddenly announced that it had completed a merger that would transform the company into a legitimate coal-mining operation. The move came as a surprise to many, since AENY had delayed the merger – pending an additional $8 million in financing – just a few weeks earlier. With skeptics portraying AENY as an overvalued corporate shell, however, the company abruptly finalized the deal after raising less than half of the $8 million called for under its new financing arrangement. more...

Jayhawk, No Longer a Highflier, Crashes to Earth

* Click here to start/join a discussion of this article or send tips for future news stories.

Following a swift plunge that cut its stock price by almost half, Jayhawk Energy (JYHW.OB) stepped forward this week to blame the recent volatility on outside promotions followed by aggressive profit-taking – a classic, if softened, description of a “pump-and-dump” scheme – with no connection to the company’s actual operations. JYHW insisted that the company itself played no role in the stock’s short-lived rally, even though its top officer profited from the stock’s big run-up before its subsequent crash. more...

AENY: The Dirty Truth behind the Pretty Coal Stock

Click here to start/join a discussion of this article or send tips for future news stories.

Last fall, around the same time that British Columbian regulators issued a cease-trading order for Americas Energy Company (AENY.OB) stock, U.S. investors began fielding bullish emails urging them to buy the company’s shares.

The Intelligent Investor Report, a promotional newsletter published by Jarret Wollstein, highlighted AENY (then trading under the ticker symbol TRET) as his top coal pick of 2009 and predicted that the company would be producing more than $100 million worth of coal annually by the end of next year. He portrayed AENY – a shell company with limited operations -- as a likely “10-bagger” for fast-acting investors willing to buy the shares early and then hold onto them for the long term. more...

IMGG Fails to Paint a Pretty Picture for Investors

* Click here to start/join a discussion of this article or send tips for future news stories.

The picture at Imaging3 (IMGG.OB) just got a whole lot uglier.

IMGG dropped a bombshell on investors this week, when it revealed a major setback in its lengthy battle to secure regulatory approval of its Dominion 3-D scanning device. For months, IMGG has indicated that the company simply needed to resolve one minor issue – involving the Dominion’s label – in order to satisfy reviewers at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. During a conference call with shareholders on Tuesday, however, IMGG reported that it has now fielded more than a dozen questions from FDA staffers who are evaluating the company’s device. more...

IMGG Investors Grow Tired of Holding Their Breath

* Click here to start/join a discussion of this article or send tips for future news stories.

Imaging3 (IMGG.OB) suffered another major setback this week, triggering a massive selloff in its stock, as the company fielded additional questions from federal regulators about its Dominion scanning device.

By now, IMGG investors have waited years for the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to clear the company’s Dominion scanner for sale under a 510(k) process that normally takes just a few short months to complete. More than 900 days after IMGG first submitted its 3-D scanner for review, however, the company is still waiting for the FDA to bless its breakthrough device. more...

For NXTH Investors, 2010 Could Be Hard to Swallow

* Click here to start/join a discussion of this article or send tips for future news stories.

NXT Nutritionals (NXTH.OB) shareholders who trust the company’s sweet outlook for 2010 could wind up with a bitter taste in their mouths.

The company’s rosy forecast included plenty of hype about its SUSTA-brand sweetener but none of the actual financial projections that normally dominate official guidance. It also failed to mention a looming threat – massive dilution – that could soon hammer its generous share price. more...

NXTH and The Shaq: A Sweet-and-Sour Deal?

* Click here to start/join a discussion of this article or send tips for future news stories.

When NXT Nutritionals (NXTH.OB) recently announced that basketball legend Shaquille “Shaq” O’Neal had agreed to endorse the company’s sweetener, investors rushed to celebrate their good fortune. That blessing could turn into a curse, however, if history serves as any guide. more...

Talk Is Getting Cheap at Imaging3

* Click here to start/join a discussion of this article or send tips for future news stories.

Imaging3 (IMGG.OB) is learning an important, if painful, lesson: A picture really is worth a thousand words.

IMGG has been trying for years to secure regulatory clearance for a new device that, it says, can produce real-time 3D images that will revolutionize the practice of medicine. Now that yet another projected date for approval of the device has passed without results, however, investors are starting to ask a very basic question. Specifically, they want to know why IMGG has failed to share the remarkable images that its device is supposed to be capable of delivering. more...

AWSL Chairman Has Some Skeletons in His Closet

* Click here to start/join a discussion of this article or send tips for future news stories.

Gilles Trahan, the chairman of both Atlantic Wind & Solar (AWSL.PK) and MSE Enviro-Tech (MEVT.PK), better hope that investors don’t start judging him by the company he keeps.

After all, Trahan has ties to Basil Meecham – a past target of securities regulators – that date back at least eight years. The two men remained connected as Facebook friends as recently as last month, although they have since taken steps to block visitor access to their personal information. The Street Sweeper captured evidence of that Facebook friendship weeks ago, however, in anticipation of such changes. more...

The Picture Gets Even Fuzzier at Imaging3

* Click here to start/join a discussion on this article or send tips for future news stories.

Imaging3 (IMGG) is now fielding questions from two regulatory agencies.

More than two years after submitting its Dominion 3-D scanner for clearance by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, IMGG is still trying to address concerns raised by the agency about its breakthrough medical device. Meanwhile, the company is now attempting to overcome issues raised by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission – which derailed its annual shareholder meeting -- as well. more...

NXTH & CLRH: Connected Like Siamese Twins

* Click here to start/join a discussion on this story or send tips for future news articles.

Investors blinded by the pretty stock prices for NXT Nutritionals (OTC.BB:NXTH) and Clear-Lite Holdings (OTC.BB:CLRH) might want to take a closer look at other – less attractive – traits shared by these two companies.

After going public through reverse mergers with shell companies earlier this year, both NXTH and CLRH promptly hired the same part-time CFO to keep their books in order. They also retained the same auditing firm in Boca Raton – a region viewed by regulators as a hotbed for securities-related fraud – to bless their financial statements. They even chose the same tainted public relations firm to attract potential investors. (That firm failed to answer questions about the companies for this story.) more...

IMGG Investors Still Waiting for Judgment Day

* Click here to start/join a discussion on this article or send tips for future news stories.

The story at Imaging3 (OTC.BB:IMGG) is following the same familiar plotline made famous by the popular movie “Groundhog Day.”

Every morning, IMGG investors wake up with high hopes that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration will finally clear the company’s Dominion 3-D scanning device for sale. Every night, they return to bed with a sense of disappointment lightened only by the chance that tomorrow will somehow be different and bring the good news they so crave. more...

Are Those Dark Spots on That X-Ray of Imaging3?

* Click here to start/join a discussion on this article or send tips for future news stories.

Based on comments made in a spring episode of “Health This Week with Don Baillargeon” – a program hosted by a repeat target of securities regulators – Imaging3 CEO Dean Janes has been waiting six months for an urgent phone call from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration that he will probably never receive.

Janes appeared on the show in May with high hopes that the FDA was finally nearing approval of IMGG’s Dominion 3-D imaging device. Although two years had passed since IMGG first submitted the Dominion for FDA review, using a speedy 510(k) process that often takes just months to complete, Janes acted as though the agency’s long-awaited blessing might come at any moment. more...

The Truth Behind the New 'Salt-Free' Diet at AWSL

* Click here to start/join a discussion on this article or send tips for future news stories.

When Atlantic Wind & Solar (AWSL) issued its latest investor update, the company buried a potential bombshell – disclosing plans to abandon a celebrated project with Morton Salt – beneath announcements about a revised business strategy and a new corporate headquarters.

Just two months ago, AWSL claimed that it had landed a contract with Morton to carry out a feasibility study for the generation of renewable power at the company’s big salt-producing facility in the Bahamas. Back then, at least, AWSL seemed excited by the deal and the opportunities it might bring. more...

Surgeon Seeks to Cut Influence of Device Industry

Charles Rosen is a soft-spoken spine surgeon who has earned the kind of reputation that’s normally assigned to a hard-nosed cop.

He first blew the whistle on a giant healthcare company a decade ago, when a hospital owned by Tenet – the second-largest publicly traded hospital chain in the country – failed to inform him that its operating-room sterilizer had not been working properly for months. As the hospital’s chief of surgery, Rosen was asked to minimize the problem during an upcoming inspection by the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. Instead, Rosen sounded an alarm during JCAHO’s annual visit and promptly resigned in protest when the agency – which counted one of the hospital’s directors among its own board members – ignored his concerns. more...

Force Protection Gives Management Royal Treatment

Last month, as Force Protection (FRPT) prepared to slash its workforce in an effort to save money, the company quietly adopted a new policy that could expand the bonus awarded to its well-paid CEO.

Michael Moody, who earned seven figures as Force Protection’s brand-new CEO in 2008, could score even more this year despite plummeting orders for the company’s military vehicles. Originally, Force Protection guaranteed Moody a salary of at least $540,000 – and a bonus that could equal up to 75% of that amount – under his formal contract with the company. With a recent amendment to that agreement, however, Force Protection essentially removed any limits on Moody’s 2009 cash bonus.